| Literature DB >> 29449860 |
Kai-Ming Shih1, Chung-Te Chang2, Jeng-Der Chung3, Yu-Chung Chiang4, Shih-Ying Hwang1.
Abstract
Double digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq) is a tool for delivering genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for non-model organisms useful in resolving fine-scale population structure and detecting signatures of selection. This study performs population genetic analysis, based on ddRADseq data, of a coniferous species, Keteleeria davidiana var. formosana, disjunctly distributed in northern and southern Taiwan, for investigation of population adaptive divergence in response to environmental heterogeneity. A total of 13,914 SNPs were detected and used to assess genetic diversity, FST outlier detection, population genetic structure, and individual assignments of five populations (62 individuals) of K. davidiana var. formosana. Principal component analysis (PCA), individual assignments, and the neighbor-joining tree were successful in differentiating individuals between northern and southern populations of K. davidiana var. formosana, but apparent gene flow between the southern DW30 population and northern populations was also revealed. Fifteen of 23 highly differentiated SNPs identified were found to be strongly associated with environmental variables, suggesting isolation-by-environment (IBE). However, multiple matrix regression with randomization analysis revealed strong IBE as well as significant isolation-by-distance. Environmental impacts on divergence were found between populations of the North and South regions and also between the two southern neighboring populations. BLASTN annotation of the sequences flanking outlier SNPs gave significant hits for three of 23 markers that might have biological relevance to mitochondrial homeostasis involved in the survival of locally adapted lineages. Species delimitation between K. davidiana var. formosana and its ancestor, K. davidiana, was also examined (72 individuals). This study has produced highly informative population genomic data for the understanding of population attributes, such as diversity, connectivity, and adaptive divergence associated with large- and small-scale environmental heterogeneity in K. davidiana var. formosana.Entities:
Keywords: K. davidiana var. formosana; Keteleeria davidiana; SNP; adaptive divergence; fine-scale differentiation; population genetics; species delimitation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29449860 PMCID: PMC5799944 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Population genetic parameters of the five sampled populations of Taiwan cow-tail fir based on ddRADseq.
| JGL | 376 | 10 | 24°54′52.278″N | 1.105 (0.001) | 0.109 (0.001) | 0.135 (0.002) | 0.100 (0.001) | 0.109 (0.001) | −0.270 | 20.804 (1.000) | 0.004 (1.000) |
| 121°40′36.679″E | |||||||||||
| GPL | 561 | 8 | 24°53′52.959″N | 1.104 (0.001) | 0.109 (0.001) | 0.135 (0.002) | 0.099 (0.001) | 0.109 (0.001) | −0.264 | 4.252 (0.148) | 0.001 (0.106) |
| 121°41′13.058″E | |||||||||||
| ST | 436 | 10 | 24°53′35.246″N | 1.105 (0.001) | 0.109 (0.001) | 0.133 (0.002) | 0.101 (0.001) | 0.109 (0.001) | −0.2434 | 47.340 (1.000) | 0.008 (1.000) |
| 121°41′48.236″E | |||||||||||
| DW30 | 799 | 17 | 22°36′42.394″N | 1.094 (0.001) | 0.096 (0.001) | 0.119 (0.002) | 0.092 (0.001) | 0.096 (0.001) | −0.249 | 23.811 (0.459) | 0.004 (0.380) |
| 121°0′19.435″E | |||||||||||
| DW41 | 702 | 17 | 22°25'38.369″N | 1.091 (0.001) | 0.093 (0.001) | 0.119 (0.002) | 0.089 (0.001) | 0.093 (0.001) | −0.298 | 4.931 (0.002) | 0.001 (0.002) |
| 120°51′3.006″E | |||||||||||
| Average | 1.100 | 0.103 | 0.128 | 0.096 | 0.103 |
N, Number of samples; A.
P < 0.0001.
Figure 1Geographic distribution of the five populations of Taiwan cow-tail fir and annual mean gradients of seven environmental variables. BIO1, annual mean temperature; BIO12, annual precipitation; RainD, number of rainfall days per year. Annual mean gradients were smoothed using a universal spherical model of the Kriging method in ArcGIS.
Selective outliers identified by BAYESCAN and FDIST and their correlations with environmental variables analyzed with Samβada.
| (1) 63667_37 | 0.520 | 0.573 | |||||||
| (2) 93955_78 | 3.398 | 0.778 | 1.987 | 1,000 | AA (RainD) | ||||
| (3) 109734_33 | 0.701 | 0.690 | |||||||
| (4) 109734_46 | 1,000 | 3.699 | 3.398 | 2.795 | CC (Aspect); TT (RainD) | ||||
| (5) 151653_31 | 2.467 | ||||||||
| (6) 161549_14 | 1.962 | CT (Aspect); TT (Aspect) | |||||||
| (7) 207023_57 | 3.097 | 2.191 | 1.392 | 1.570 | AA (RainD) | ||||
| (8) 227675_81 | 1.186 | ||||||||
| (9) 280158_34 | 0.625 | 0.644 | CC (Soil pH) | ||||||
| (10) 313537_25 | 1.307 | 0.517 | 1.425 | TT (RainD, Aspect) | |||||
| (11) 315865_72 | 0.556 | 0.630 | |||||||
| (12) 334591_7 | 1,000 | 1.144 | 1.055 | 1.149 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | TT (BIO1); GG (BIO1) | |
| (13) 340782_17 | 2.104 | AA (BIO12, RainD); AG (BIO12, RainD) | |||||||
| (14) 341940_10 | 1.352 | ||||||||
| (15) 341940_78 | 1.086 | ||||||||
| (16) 505960_78 | 1,000 | 1.483 | 0.807 | 1.400 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | AA (BIO1); CC(BIO1) | |
| (17) 521876_50 | 1.528 | TT (BIO1); GT (BIO1) | |||||||
| (18) 521876_51 | 1.525 | CC (BIO1); AC (BIO1) | |||||||
| (19) 522238_59 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 2.234 | 1.507 | GG (Aspect); AA (RainD) | ||||
| (20) 559821_24 | 1.553 | ||||||||
| (21) 638724_65 | 1.240 | AA (BIO1); AC (BIO1) | |||||||
| (22) 638724_71 | 1.294 | GG (BIO1); AG (BIO1) | |||||||
| (23) 734440_39 | 3.398 | 0.917 | 0.650 | AA (Aspect) | |||||
BIO1, annual mean temperature; BIO12, annual precipitation; RainD, number of rainfall days per year.
Represents outliers also detected by FDIST.
In Samβada analysis, significant association between SNP genotypes and environmental variables was determined using false discovery rate of 1% in 483 comparisons.
Summary of the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) and across population FST.
| Between species | |||
| Between populations of KDF | |||
| Between northern and southern populations of KDF | |||
| Between northern populations of KDF | |||
| Between southern populations of KDF | |||
Results represent comparison between Taiwan cow-tail fir and its ancestor, Keteleeria davidiana and comparisons between populations of Taiwan cow-tail fir under different scenarios. Values within parentheses are P-values.
Figure 2Scatter plots of the first two principal components (PCs) based on allelic frequencies of SNPs. (A) Samples of Taiwan cow-tail fir and Keteleeria davidiana (n = 72) and (B) samples of Taiwan cow-tail fir (n = 62). See Table 1 for population code abbreviations for Taiwan cow-tail fir. KD, K. davidiana.
Figure 3Barplots represent inference of individual assignments based on LEA and ADMIXTURE (ADM) for different clustering scenarios (K). (A) Samples of Taiwan cow-tail fir and Keteleeria davidiana (n = 72) and (B) samples of Taiwan cow-tail fir (n = 62). See Table 1 for population code abbreviations. KD, K. davidiana.
Figure 4Neighbor-joining tree of samples of Taiwan cow-tail fir and Keteleeria davidiana based on Nei's genetic distance. Bootstrap support values (BSVs) were coded with colored nodes with BSVs ≥ 90% (green), 90% < BSVs ≥ 70% (red), and BSVs < 70% (blue), respectively. See Table 1 for population code abbreviations. KD, K. davidiana.
Forward selection of environmental variables classified into three categories (bioclimate, ecology, and topology) explaining genetic variation within Taiwan cow-tail fir.
| Bioclimate | BIO1BIO12 | 0.029 | 0.012 | 1.762 (0.001) | 0.177 | 0.164 | 12.95 (0.001) |
| Ecology | RainD Soil pH NDVI | 0.037 | 0.021 | 2.329 (0.001) | 0.322 | 0.311 | 28.55 (0.001) |
| Topology | Aspect Slope | 0.003 | 0.017 | 2.046 (0.001) | 0.242 | 0.230 | 19.18 (0.001) |
BIO1, Annual mean temperature; BIO12, annual precipitation; RainD, number of rainfall days per year; NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index.
Results of multiple matrix regression with randomization (MMRR) analysis.
| Genetic vs. environment | 0.013 | 0.318 (0.553) | |
| Genetics vs. geography | 0.303 | 0.181 | |
| Genetic vs. environment + geography | 0.329 | 0.209 | −0.059 (0.538) |
| Genetic vs. environment | 0.822 | 0.924 (0.045) | |
| Genetics vs. geography | 0.904 | 0.904 (0.017) | |
| Genetic vs. environment + geography | 0.974 | 0.591 (0.064) | 0.430 (0.040) |
MMRR analysis inferring the effects of geographic (β.