| Literature DB >> 29449755 |
Wenjia Wang1, Lei Yang1, Zhaosen Yin1, Shengyan Kong1, Wei Han1, Jinglai Zhang1.
Abstract
In this study, human feces were hydrothermal liquefied andEntities:
Keywords: Biocrude; Catalyst; Excrement treatment; Human feces; Hydrothermal liquefaction
Year: 2018 PMID: 29449755 PMCID: PMC5806599 DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.11.081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Energy Convers Manag ISSN: 0196-8904 Impact factor: 9.709
Proximate and ultimate analysis of feedstock.
| Parameters | Human feces | Sludge | Nannochloropsis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| This study | ||||
| Proximate analysis (%) | ||||
| TS (Total solid) | 15.13 ± 1.93 | 19.6 ± 3.8 | 15.48 | – |
| Ash | 9.28 ± 0.42 | 17.0 ± 1.3 | 23.01 | 6.8 |
| Biochemical analysis (%) | ||||
| Protein | 45.28 ± 1.94 | – | 37.84 | 66.5 |
| Lipid | 13.50 ± 1.10 | – | 8.01 | 23.2 |
| Carbohydrate | 31.94 ± 0.89 | – | 31.14 | 10.3 |
| Organic element analysis (%) | ||||
| C | 50.51 ± 1.06 | 42.4 ± 1.3 | 46.68 | 47.08 |
| H | 6.75 ± 0.31 | 6.9 ± 0.9 | 6.85 | 8.77 |
| O | 35.76 ± 0.90 | 43.1 ± 3.1 | 37.60 | 34.54 |
| N | 6.05 ± 0.49 | 5.9 ± 1.0 | 8.05 | 8.07 |
| S | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 0.81 | 1.54 |
Based on dry biomass.
Calculated by difference.
Fig. 1Products distribution and liquefaction conversion of human feces at different catalytic conditions. AP: aqueous product; GP: gaseous product; SR: solid residue; B: biocrude.
Elemental composition of biocrude samples from different catalysts. (300 °C, 30 min, 10 wt% catalyst loading).
| Catalyst | Element composition (wt.%) | H/C | HHV (MJ/kg) | ER (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | H | O | N | S | ||||
| Blank | 71.10 | 9.79 | 11.31 | 7.49 | 0.31 | 1.65 | 35.78 | 66.77 |
| TiO2 | 66.13 | 8.05 | 16.62 | 8.67 | 0.53 | 1.46 | 31.52 | 58.69 |
| Ni/TiO2 | 68.39 | 8.76 | 14.44 | 7.96 | 0.45 | 1.54 | 33.33 | 63.50 |
| Tm/TiO2 | 67.14 | 9.02 | 15.46 | 8.13 | 0.25 | 1.61 | 33.10 | 61.41 |
| Ni-Tm/TiO2 | 71.79 | 9.24 | 10.45 | 8.28 | 0.24 | 1.54 | 35.45 | 73.34 |
ER: energy recovery.
Triplicate was conducted for element analysis, the relative standard deviation value was less than 1%, and only average value was presented.
Calculated by difference.
Fig. 2Products distribution and liquefaction conversion of human feces at various operating conditions (a) different reaction temperature (b) different holding time. AP: aqueous product; GP: gaseous product; SR: solid residue; B: biocrude.
Analysis of biocrude samples from various HTL operating conditions with Ni-Tm/TiO2 catalyst.
| Temperature (°C) | Holding time (min) | Element content (wt.%) | H/C | HHV (MJ/kg) | ER (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | H | O | N | S | |||||
| Blank | |||||||||
| 300 | 30 | 71.10 | 9.79 | 11.31 | 7.49 | 0.31 | 1.65 | 35.78 | 66.76 |
| 330 | 30 | 72.83 | 9.84 | 10.60 | 6.44 | 0.29 | 1.62 | 36.43 | 64.48 |
| With 10% catalyst | |||||||||
| 250 | 30 | 68.69 | 8.69 | 13.45 | 8.64 | 0.53 | 1.52 | 33.50 | 64.08 |
| 270 | 30 | 70.13 | 8.73 | 13.35 | 7.34 | 0.45 | 1.49 | 33.95 | 66.72 |
| 290 | 30 | 70.58 | 8.30 | 13.81 | 6.95 | 0.36 | 1.41 | 33.48 | 67.37 |
| 300 | 30 | 71.79 | 9.24 | 10.45 | 8.28 | 0.24 | 1.54 | 35.45 | 73.34 |
| 310 | 30 | 71.56 | 9.74 | 11.66 | 6.82 | 0.22 | 1.63 | 35.78 | 77.42 |
| 330 | 30 | 72.86 | 9.83 | 9.43 | 7.42 | 0.46 | 1.62 | 36.64 | 87.42 |
| 350 | 30 | 72.89 | 9.89 | 9.23 | 7.48 | 0.51 | 1.63 | 36.76 | 74.01 |
| 330 | 0 | 64.00 | 8.67 | 17.03 | 9.44 | 0.86 | 1.63 | 31.64 | 57.48 |
| 330 | 30 | 72.86 | 9.83 | 9.43 | 7.42 | 0.46 | 1.62 | 36.64 | 87.42 |
| 330 | 120 | 73.48 | 10.02 | 8.94 | 7.13 | 0.43 | 1.64 | 37.11 | 85.88 |
| 330 | 360 | 73.47 | 10.13 | 8.15 | 7.92 | 0.33 | 1.65 | 37.35 | 80.86 |
| 330 | 720 | 73.68 | 10.37 | 8.43 | 7.05 | 0.47 | 1.69 | 37.67 | 78.19 |
ER: energy recovery.
Triplicate was conducted for element analysis, the relative standard deviation value was less than 1%, and only average value was presented.
Calculated by difference.
Tentative identities and area percentage of major peaks in GC-MS for biocrude samples from HTL of human feces at 330 °C for 30 min and with and without 10 wt% Ni-Tm/TiO2.
| Retention time (min) | Name | Molecular formula | Relative abundance (area %) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank | Ni-Tm/TiO2 | |||
| 3.49 | Methylpyrazine | C5H6N2 | 0.33 | 2.07 |
| 4.38 | 2-Methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one | C6H8O | 1.87 | – |
| 4.41 | 2,3-Dimethylpyrazine | C6H8N2 | 0 | 1.95 |
| 5.39 | 2-Ethyl-5-methylpyrazine | C7H10N2 | 0.84 | 2.24 |
| 5.69 | 2-methyl-5-ethylpyridine | C8H11N | 0 | 1.47 |
| 6.27 | 2,6-Diethylpyrazine | C8H12N2 | 0.54 | – |
| 7.10 | 2,3-Diethyl-5-methylpyrazine | C9H14N2 | 0.15 | – |
| 8.64 | (E)-1-cycloheptenylpyrrolidine | C11H19N | 0.17 | – |
| 12.12 | 2,2,2,2-(propane-1,3-diylbis(azanetriyl))tetraacetic acid | C11H18N2O8 | – | 3.03 |
| 13.04 | 7-ethylpentadecane-4,6-dione | C17H32O2 | – | 2.85 |
| 14.01 | Methyl palmitate | C17H34O2 | 7.03 | 1.66 |
| 14.04 | (3S,6S)-3,6-di-sec-butylpiperazine-2,5-dione | C12H22N2O2 | – | 2.39 |
| 14.4 | Palmitic acid | C16H32O2 | 31.1 | 4.89 |
| 14.46 | Phthalic acid, 3-methylbutyl undecyl ester | C20H30O4 | 6.35 | 1.12 |
| 14.71 | Ethyl palmitate | C18H36O2 | 3.99 | 0.82 |
| 15.08 | Phorbol | C20H28O6 | 1.45 | 1.41 |
| 16.86 | (E)-octadec-1-enyl icosanoate | C38H74O2 | – | 1.76 |
| 17.02 | Palmitamide | C16H33NO | 4.85 | 12.66 |
| 18.05 | 1-Dodecanamide, N,N-dimethyl- | C14H29NO | 5.51 | – |
| 19.48 | (Z)-9-Octadecenamide | C18H35NO | 2.82 | 10.63 |
| 22.08 | Dioctyl phthalate | C24H38O4 | 1.64 | 8.42 |
| 29.68 | Cholest-5-en-3-ol | C27H46O | – | 19.22 |
| Total relative abundance area | 68.64 | 78.59 | ||
Fig. 3Classification of main compounds identified by GC-MS in the biocrude samples obtained at 330 °C and 30 min. OH: O-containing-only hetero-atom compound; NOH: N-and-O-containing hetero-atom compound; NH: N-containing-only heterocyclic compound.
Fig. 4Gas composition from HTL of human feces over Ni-Tm/TiO2 catalyst: (a) 330 °C with different holding time; and (b) 30 min with different reaction temperature.