Cheolmin Lee1, Hua-Hie Yong2, Ron Borland3, Ann McNeill4, Sara C Hitchman4. 1. Department of Family Medicine, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. 2. Nigel Gray Fellowship Group, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia. 3. Nigel Gray Fellowship Group, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: Ron.Borland@cancervic.org.au. 4. Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom; UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies (UKCTAS), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study examined the prevalence and correlates of (1) perceived social acceptability of personal vaporizer (PV)/e-cigarette use, and (2) reported vaping in public and private places, in the UK and Australia with different regulatory environments for PVs. METHODS: Data analyzed come from 2849 smokers and recent ex-smokers in the UK and Australia who participated in the 2014 wave of the International Tobacco Control Survey. RESULTS: UK respondents were more likely to think vaping is socially acceptable than Australians (56.4% vs. 27.9%; p < 0.001). Having quit smoking, observing vaping in smoke-free (SF) public places, and believing vaping is less harmful than smoking was all significantly associated with greater perceived social acceptability of vaping in both countries. However, vaping status and that of friends and family were more influential in Australia than in the UK. Vaping was reported as much more common in private, than public, settings in both countries. UK vapers were more likely to report vaping in SF public places (OR = 2.66; 95% CI = 1.5-4.7; p < 0.01) and at home (OR = 2.44; 95% CI = 1.5-3.9; p < 0.001), but not in their car when controlling for demographic factors and vaping and smoking status. CONCLUSION: The acceptability of vaping was greater among those who were more exposed to vaping and not just among those with some personal experience of vaping, suggesting no strong social barriers to increased use. Vaping in SF public places was less common than in homes, and both were more common in the UK than in Australia, suggesting some social constraints on use, particularly in Australia.
BACKGROUND: This study examined the prevalence and correlates of (1) perceived social acceptability of personal vaporizer (PV)/e-cigarette use, and (2) reported vaping in public and private places, in the UK and Australia with different regulatory environments for PVs. METHODS: Data analyzed come from 2849 smokers and recent ex-smokers in the UK and Australia who participated in the 2014 wave of the International Tobacco Control Survey. RESULTS: UK respondents were more likely to think vaping is socially acceptable than Australians (56.4% vs. 27.9%; p < 0.001). Having quit smoking, observing vaping in smoke-free (SF) public places, and believing vaping is less harmful than smoking was all significantly associated with greater perceived social acceptability of vaping in both countries. However, vaping status and that of friends and family were more influential in Australia than in the UK. Vaping was reported as much more common in private, than public, settings in both countries. UK vapers were more likely to report vaping in SF public places (OR = 2.66; 95% CI = 1.5-4.7; p < 0.01) and at home (OR = 2.44; 95% CI = 1.5-3.9; p < 0.001), but not in their car when controlling for demographic factors and vaping and smoking status. CONCLUSION: The acceptability of vaping was greater among those who were more exposed to vaping and not just among those with some personal experience of vaping, suggesting no strong social barriers to increased use. Vaping in SF public places was less common than in homes, and both were more common in the UK than in Australia, suggesting some social constraints on use, particularly in Australia.
Authors: G T Fong; K M Cummings; R Borland; G Hastings; A Hyland; G A Giovino; D Hammond; M E Thompson Journal: Tob Control Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Andrew Hyland; Cheryl Higbee; Ron Borland; Mark Travers; Gerard Hastings; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Sarah E Adkison; Richard J O'Connor; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Andrew Hyland; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; K Michael Cummings; Ann McNeill; James F Thrasher; David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Shannon Gravely; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; Mi Yan; Anne C K Quah; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; Sara C Hitchman; Ann McNeill; David Hammond; James F Thrasher; Marc C Willemsen; Hong Gwan Seo; Yuan Jiang; Tania Cavalcante; Cristina Perez; Maizurah Omar; Karin Hummel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Hua-Hie Yong; Ron Borland; James Balmford; Sara C Hitchman; K Michael Cummings; Pete Driezen; Mary E Thompson Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Sarah Aleyan; Katherine East; Ann McNeill; K Michael Cummings; Geoffrey T Fong; Hua-Hie Yong; James F Thrasher; Ron Borland; Sara C Hitchman Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Máirtín S McDermott; Katherine A East; Sara C Hitchman; Ann McNeill; Yannis Tountas; Tibor Demjén; Esteve Fernández; Ute Mons; Antigona C Trofor; Aleksandra Herbeć; Kinga Janik-Koncewicz; Geoffrey T Fong; Constantine I Vardavas Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Máirtín S McDermott; Grace Li; Ann McNeill; David Hammond; James F Thrasher; Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Ron Borland; Geoffrey T Fong; Sara C Hitchman Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Hua-Hie Yong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Shannon Gravely; James F Thrasher; Ann McNeill; Sara Hitchman; Elizabeth Greenhalgh; Mary E Thompson; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Karen O Brandon; Vani N Simmons; Lauren R Meltzer; David J Drobes; Úrsula Martínez; Steven K Sutton; Amanda M Palmer; Christopher R Bullen; Paul T Harrell; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Úrsula Martínez; Víctor Martínez-Loredo; Vani N Simmons; Lauren R Meltzer; David J Drobes; Karen O Brandon; Amanda M Palmer; Thomas Eissenberg; Christopher R Bullen; Paul T Harrell; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 4.244