| Literature DB >> 29447206 |
Janina Gergen1,2,3, Flora Coulon1,2, Alison Creneguy1,2, Nathan Elain-Duret1,2,3, Alejandra Gutierrez4, Olaf Pinkenburg5, Els Verhoeyen4,6, Ignacio Anegon1,2,3, Tuan Huy Nguyen1,2, Franck Albert Halary1,2, Fabienne Haspot1,2,3.
Abstract
Anti-HCMV treatments used in immunosuppressed patients reduce viral replication, but resistant viral strains can emerge. Moreover, these drugs do not target latently infected cells. We designed two anti-viral CRISPR/Cas9 strategies to target the UL122/123 gene, a key regulator of lytic replication and reactivation from latency. The singleplex strategy contains one gRNA to target the start codon. The multiplex strategy contains three gRNAs to excise the complete UL122/123 gene. Primary fibroblasts and U-251 MG cells were transduced with lentiviral vectors encoding Cas9 and one or three gRNAs. Both strategies induced mutations in the target gene and a concomitant reduction of immediate early (IE) protein expression in primary fibroblasts. Further detailed analysis in U-251 MG cells showed that the singleplex strategy induced 50% of indels in the viral genome, leading to a reduction in IE protein expression. The multiplex strategy excised the IE gene in 90% of all viral genomes and thus led to the inhibition of IE protein expression. Consequently, viral genome replication and late protein expression were reduced by 90%. Finally, the production of new viral particles was nearly abrogated. In conclusion, the multiplex anti-UL122/123 CRISPR/Cas9 system can target the viral genome efficiently enough to significantly prevent viral replication.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29447206 PMCID: PMC5813945 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Design of the HCMV-targeting gRNAs.
Scheme for the targeted UL122/123 gene and its major splice variants for IE1 and IE2 with the position of the three designed gRNAs anti-HCMV and their corresponding sequences (Scissors: gRNA/Cas9 complex).
Fig 2The anti-HCMV CRISPR/Cas9 system induces mutations resulting in a decrease in IE protein expression in primary fibroblasts.
MRC5 cells were transduced with one of the three type 1 LVs and selected by puromycin treatment (2 μg/mL) for 2 days. Control (untransduced) and puromycin-resistant MRC5 cells were subcultured prior to infection with Toledo (MOI of 0.1). Two days pi, proteins and DNA were extracted from the infected cells via TriPrep Kit. a) Viral DNA extracts were PCR-amplified at the target region. Amplicons were subsequently subjected to T7 endonuclease to detect the indels induced by the singleplex strategy. b) PCR amplicons of the whole IE gene were analyzed to detect larger deletions induced by the multiplex strategy. The arrows highlight the indels (singleplex) and larger deletions (multiplex) induced by the anti-HCMV CRISPR/Cas9 strategies (one out of three independent experiments is shown). c) Western blot analysis of IE and Cas9 expression 2 days pi (one representative western blot out of 3 independent experiments is shown). d) At each passage, the proteins were extracted with the TriPrep Kit and the Cas9 expression was assessed by Western blot. e) Relative quantification of Cas9 expression based on the Western blot (d) normalized to the housekeeping protein actin. Pt, post-transduction.
Relative quantification of CRISPR-induced mutations in UL122/123 gene in MRC5 cells.
| singleplex | multiplex | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 ±0 | 0 ±0 | 29.02 ±2.31 | 5.36 ±0.86 | |
Mean percentage of indels are presented.
a The percentage of mutations for the singleplex strategy is analyzed based on the T7 assay and quantification of the PCR products and cleavage products using a Caliper microfluidics bioanalyzer.
b Larger deletions induced by the multiplex strategy was analyzed by PCR and quantified by a Caliper microfluidics bioanalyzer (n = 2 or 3 independent experiments for the transduced MRC5 cells).
Fig 3Mutations in the UL122/123 gene induced by the CRISPR/Cas9 anti-HCMV in U-251 MG cell line.
Control and transduced U-251 MG cells were infected with HCMV (Toledo, MOI of 1) and cultured for eight days. Viral DNA was extracted and PCR amplified. a) A T7-assay was performed on the exon 2 PCR amplicon to detect indels induced by the singleplex strategy. b) Electrogram for the T7 assay from the Caliper LabChip analysis for the unsp. gRNA and singleplex strategies. c) Large deletions induced by the multiplex strategy were highlighted by analyzing the whole UL122/123 gene amplicon. d) Electrogram for the PCR products from the Caliper LabChip analysis identify a major 500 bp amplicon and a smear above with the multiplex strategy. Arrows highlight the indels (singleplex) and larger deletions (multiplex) induced by the anti-HCMV CRISPR/Cas9 strategies. One representative experiment out of three is shown for Toledo, and similar data were found with TB40GFP and VR1814 (n = 3 independent experiments per virus strain). LM, lower marker; UL, upper marker. e) Sequence analysis of the mutations induced by the singleplex strategy in the viral genome four days pi. Black: protospacer + PAM; bold: start codon; gray: insertions; gray-white: substitution.
Relative quantification of CRISPR-induced mutations in UL122/123 gene in U-251 MG cells.
| singleplex | multiplex | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 50.63 ±9.25 | 95.18 ±5.47 | |
| 0.28 ±0.69 | 0.09 ±0.22 | 31.18 ±5.18 | 92.14 ±4.69 | |
| 0.86 ±1.62 | 1.83 ±3.09 | 46.46 ±11.78 | 80.00 ±8.58 | |
Mean percentages of indels are presented.
a The efficiency of the singleplex strategy to induce mutations is analyzed based on the T7 assay and quantified by a Caliper microfluidics bioanalyzer.
b Detection of deletions induced by the multiplex strategy is analyzed by PCR and quantified by a Caliper microfluidics bioanalyzer (n = 3 independent experiments per virus strain).
Fig 4Decrease in IE expression by HCMV-targeting CRISPR/Cas9 systems.
Control and transduced U-251 MG cells were infected with HCMV and harvested at two or eight days pi. a) Representative FACS histograms of intranuclear IE expression eight days pi are shown for all U-251 MG cell lines and three different viral strains. The gray histogram represents uninfected U-251 MG cells. b) IE expression in the different U-251 MG cell lines normalized to the HCMV-infected control U-251 MG cells (dashed line) (n = 4 to 5 independent experiments). One-way ANOVA and multiple comparison tests were performed to compare the results within the different cell lines and are presented in the table under each graph. Mann-Whitney tests were performed to analyze each cell line over time (day 2 pi vs. day 8 pi). The only significant difference is noted in the graph. c) Western blot analysis of protein extraction obtained using the TriPrep kit eight days pi (one representative western blot out of 3 independent blots is shown for each virus strain as well as for the uninfected control U-251 MG cells).
Fig 5Reduced progression of the viral replication cycle by the multiplex strategy.
Transduced and control U-251 MG cells infected with HCMV were harvested eight days pi. a) Relative viral genome quantification normalized to HCMV-infected control U-251 MG cells (dash line) (n = 3 independent experiments, +/- SD). One-way ANOVA and the multiple comparison test were performed and significant differences in the comparison to the control are mentioned. b) Cells were FACS-stained for total gB expression. Representative dot plots of total gB expression after infection with Toledo. c) gB expression normalized to HCMV-infected control U-251 MG cells (dashed line) (triangles: unsp. gRNA; dots: singleplex; diamonds: multiplex) (n = 4 independent experiments). One-way ANOVA and the multiple comparison test were performed.
Fig 6Inhibition of virion release by the CRISPR/Cas9 anti-HCMV.
A trans-infection plaque assay was performed on infected U-251 MG cells over MRC5 cells incubated in solid media. Plaque formation was observed (a) 14 days post trans-infection with TB40GFP-infected U-251 MG cell lines or (b) seven days post trans-infection with Toledo-infected U-251 MG cell lines. Each symbol represents the median of duplicates obtained in independent experiments. One-way ANOVA and the multiple comparison test were performed and only significant differences are mentioned in the Figure.