Literature DB >> 29446711

Neurophysiological adaptations in the untrained side in conjunction with cross-education of muscle strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Andrea Manca1, Tibor Hortobágyi2, John Rothwell3, Franca Deriu1.   

Abstract

We reviewed the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on the neurophysiological adaptations in the untrained side associated with cross-education of strength (CE) and pooled data into definite effect estimates for neurophysiological variables assessed in chronic CE studies. Furthermore, scoping directions for future research were provided to enhance the homogeneity and comparability of studies investigating the neural responses to CE. The magnitude of CE was 21.1 ± 18.2% (mean ± SD; P < 0.0001) in 22 RCTs ( n = 467 subjects) that measured at least 1 neurophysiological variable in the untrained side, including the following: electromyography (EMG; 14 studies); motor evoked potential (MEP; 8 studies); short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), recruitment curve, and M wave (6 studies); cortical silent period (cSP; 5 studies); interhemispheric inhibition, intracortical facilitation (ICF), and H reflex (2 studies); and V wave, short-interval ICF, short-latency afferent inhibition, and long-latency afferent inhibition (1 study). Only EMG, MEP, ICF, cSP, and SICI could be included in the meta-analysis (18 studies, n = 387). EMG ( P = 0.26, n = 235) and MEP amplitude ( P = 0.11, n = 145) did not change in the untrained limb after CE. cSP duration ( P = 0.02, n = 114) and SICI ( P = 0.001, n = 95) decreased in the untrained hemisphere according to body region and type and intensity of training. The magnitude of CE did not correlate with changes in these transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures. The design of this meta-analytical study and the lack of correlations prevented the ability to link mechanistically the observed neurophysiological changes to CE. Notwithstanding the limited amount of data available for pooling, the use of TMS to assess the ipsilateral neurophysiological responses to unilateral training still confirms the central neural origin hypothesis of chronic CE induced by strength training. However, how these neural adaptations contribute to CE remains unclear.

Keywords:  contralateral training; electromyography; motor evoked potential; strength; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29446711     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01016.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  6 in total

1.  The time course of cross-education during short-term isometric strength training.

Authors:  Joshua C Carr; Xin Ye; Matt S Stock; Michael G Bemben; Jason M DeFreitas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Functional relevance of stroke-related losses in GABAB -mediated interhemispheric inhibition for alternative modes of stroke recovery.

Authors:  Justin W Andrushko; Dakota T Zirk
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Training-Induced Neural Plasticity and Strength Are Amplified After Stroke.

Authors:  Yao Sun; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.230

4.  Contralateral Effects of Unilateral Strength and Skill Training: Modified Delphi Consensus to Establish Key Aspects of Cross-Education.

Authors:  A Manca; T Hortobágyi; T J Carroll; R M Enoka; J P Farthing; S C Gandevia; D J Kidgell; J L Taylor; F Deriu
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training.

Authors:  Jakob Škarabot; Callum G Brownstein; Andrea Casolo; Alessandro Del Vecchio; Paul Ansdell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Ipsilateral Lower-to-Upper Limb Cross-Transfer Effect on Muscle Strength, Mechanical Power, and Lean Tissue Mass after Accentuated Eccentric Loading.

Authors:  Hashish R Magdi; Sergio Maroto-Izquierdo; José Antonio de Paz
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.