Literature DB >> 29446570

Gratitude, protective buffering, and cognitive dissonance: How families respond to pediatric whole exome sequencing in the absence of actionable results.

Allison Werner-Lin1, Lori Zaspel1, Mae Carlson1, Rebecca Mueller2, Sarah A Walser3, Ria Desai4, Barbara A Bernhardt3.   

Abstract

Clinical genome and exome sequencing (CGES) may identify variants leading to targeted management of existing conditions. Yet, CGES often fails to identify pathogenic diagnostic variants and introduces uncertainties by detecting variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and secondary findings. This study investigated how families understand findings and adjust their perspectives on CGES. As part of NIH's Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium, children were recruited from clinics at the Children's Hospital of Pennsylvania (CHOP) and offered exome sequencing. Primary pathogenic and possibly pathogenic, and some secondary findings were returned. Investigators digitally recorded results disclosure sessions and conducted 3-month follow up interviews with 10 adolescents and a parent. An interdisciplinary team coded all transcripts. Participants were initially disappointed with findings, yet reactions evolved within disclosure sessions and at 3-month interviews toward acceptance and satisfaction. Families erroneously expected, and prepared extensively, to learn about risk for common conditions. During disclosure sessions, parents and adolescents varied in how they monitored and responded to each others reactions. Several misinterpreted, or overestimated, the utility of findings to attribute meaning and achieve closure for the CGES experience. Participants perceived testing as an opportunity to improve disease management despite results that did not introduce new treatments or diagnoses. Future research may examine whether families experience cognitive dissonance regarding discrepancies between expectations and findings, and how protective buffering minimizes the burden of disappointment on loved ones. As CGES is increasingly integrated into clinical care providers must contend with tempering family expectations and interpretations of findings while managing complex medical care.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescents; exome sequencing; family communication; genetic counseling; parents; qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29446570     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  7 in total

1.  Legacies and Relationships: Diverse Social Networks and BRCA1/2 Risk Management Decisions and Actions.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Allison Werner-Lin; Lindsey Hoskins; Jennifer Young; Jennifer T Loud; June Peters; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Fam Nurs       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.818

Review 2.  Patients' views on variants of uncertain significance across indications.

Authors:  Kristin Clift; Sarah Macklin; Colin Halverson; Jennifer B McCormick; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; Stephanie Hines
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-08-20

3.  Perceived utility and disutility of genomic sequencing for pediatric patients: Perspectives from parents with diverse sociodemographic characteristics.

Authors:  Meghan C Halley; Jennifer L Young; Liliana Fernandez; Jennefer N Kohler; Jonathan A Bernstein; Matthew T Wheeler; Holly K Tabor
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Mixed-methods evaluation of the NHS Genomic Medicine Service for paediatric rare diseases: study protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations].

Authors:  Celine Lewis; James Buchannan; Angus Clarke; Emma Clement; Bettina Friedrich; Jillian Hastings-Ward; Melissa Hill; Ruth Horn; Anneke M Lucassen; Chris Patch; Alexandra Pickard; Lauren Roberts; Saskia C Sanderson; Sarah L Lewell; Cecilia Vindrola-Padros; Monica Lakhanpaul
Journal:  NIHR Open Res       Date:  2021-11-22

5.  Cancer patients' understandings of genetic variants of uncertain significance in clinical care.

Authors:  Yael Amano; Aviad Raz; Stefan Timmermans; Shiri Shkedi-Rafid
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-05-26

6.  Development of a measure of genome sequencing knowledge for young people: The kids-KOGS.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Bao S Loe; Chris Sidey-Gibbons; Christine Patch; Lyn S Chitty; Saskia C Sanderson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Views of Israeli healthcare professionals regarding communication of genetic variants of uncertain significance to patients.

Authors:  Alma Levin Fridman; Aviad Raz; Stefan Timmermans; Shiri Shkedi-Rafid
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.