Thomas Danne1, Anke Schwandt2,3, Torben Biester1, Bettina Heidtmann4, Birgit Rami-Merhar5, Holger Haberland6, Silvia Müther7, Semik Khodaverdi8, Thomas Haak9, Reinhard W Holl2,3. 1. Diabetes Center for Children and Adolescents, Kinder- und Jugendkrankenhaus AUF DER BULT, Hannover, Germany. 2. Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, ZIBMT, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. 3. German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Munich, Germany. 4. Catholic Children's Hospital Wilhelmstift, Hamburg, Germany. 5. Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 6. Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany. 7. DRK-Kinderklinik Westend, Berlin, Germany. 8. Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Klinikum Hanau, Hanau, Germany. 9. Diabetes Zentrum Mergentheim, Bad Mergentheim, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who switched from multiple daily injections (MDI) to a tubeless insulin pump (Omnipod Insulin Management System, Insulet Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts) compared to patients who continued MDI therapy over a 3-year time period. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the German/Austrian Diabetes Patienten Verlaufsdokumentation registry included data from 263 centers and 2529 patients <20 years (n = 660 tubeless insulin pump; n = 1869 MDI) who initiated treatment on a tubeless insulin pump as of January 1, 2013 and had 1 year of data preswitch from MDI and 3 years of data postswitch to a tubeless pump. Outcomes included the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin dose, and body mass index (BMI) SD score (SDS). RESULTS: Youth with T1D who switched from MDI therapy to a tubeless insulin pump showed better glycemic control at 1 year compared to patients who continued MDI treatment, adjusted mean ± SE: 7.5% ± 0.03% (58 mmol/mol) vs 7.7% ± 0.02% (61 mmol/mol); P < .001, with no between-group difference at 2 and 3 years. Total daily insulin dose was lower (P < .001) in the tubeless insulin pump group, 0.80 ± 0.01, 0.81 ± 0.01, and 0.85 ± 0.01 U/kg, vs the MDI group, 0.89 ± 0.01, 0.94 ± 0.01, and 0.97 ± 0.01 U/kg, at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively (all P < .001). BMI SDS increased in both groups and was not different over time. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a tubeless insulin pump in youth with T1D was associated with improvements in glycemic control compared to MDI after 1 year and appears to be an effective alternative to MDI.
OBJECTIVE: To examine glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who switched from multiple daily injections (MDI) to a tubeless insulin pump (Omnipod Insulin Management System, Insulet Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts) compared to patients who continued MDI therapy over a 3-year time period. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the German/Austrian Diabetes Patienten Verlaufsdokumentation registry included data from 263 centers and 2529 patients <20 years (n = 660 tubeless insulin pump; n = 1869 MDI) who initiated treatment on a tubeless insulin pump as of January 1, 2013 and had 1 year of data preswitch from MDI and 3 years of data postswitch to a tubeless pump. Outcomes included the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin dose, and body mass index (BMI) SD score (SDS). RESULTS: Youth with T1D who switched from MDI therapy to a tubeless insulin pump showed better glycemic control at 1 year compared to patients who continued MDI treatment, adjusted mean ± SE: 7.5% ± 0.03% (58 mmol/mol) vs 7.7% ± 0.02% (61 mmol/mol); P < .001, with no between-group difference at 2 and 3 years. Total daily insulin dose was lower (P < .001) in the tubeless insulin pump group, 0.80 ± 0.01, 0.81 ± 0.01, and 0.85 ± 0.01 U/kg, vs the MDI group, 0.89 ± 0.01, 0.94 ± 0.01, and 0.97 ± 0.01 U/kg, at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively (all P < .001). BMI SDS increased in both groups and was not different over time. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a tubeless insulin pump in youth with T1D was associated with improvements in glycemic control compared to MDI after 1 year and appears to be an effective alternative to MDI.
Authors: Sanjeev N Mehta; Liane J Tinsley; Davida Kruger; Bruce Bode; Jennifer E Layne; Lauren M Huyett; Kate Dryga; Bonnie Dumais; Trang T Ly; Lori M Laffel Journal: Clin Diabetes Date: 2021-01