Literature DB >> 29446062

Predicted MHC peptide binding promiscuity explains MHC class I 'hotspots' of antigen presentation defined by mass spectrometry eluted ligand data.

Emma Christine Jappe1,2, Jens Kringelum1, Thomas Trolle1, Morten Nielsen2,3.   

Abstract

Peptides that bind to and are presented by MHC class I and class II molecules collectively make up the immunopeptidome. In the context of vaccine development, an understanding of the immunopeptidome is essential, and much effort has been dedicated to its accurate and cost-effective identification. Current state-of-the-art methods mainly comprise in silico tools for predicting MHC binding, which is strongly correlated with peptide immunogenicity. However, only a small proportion of the peptides that bind to MHC molecules are, in fact, immunogenic, and substantial work has been dedicated to uncovering additional determinants of peptide immunogenicity. In this context, and in light of recent advancements in mass spectrometry (MS), the existence of immunological hotspots has been given new life, inciting the hypothesis that hotspots are associated with MHC class I peptide immunogenicity. We here introduce a precise terminology for defining these hotspots and carry out a systematic analysis of MS and in silico predicted hotspots. We find that hotspots defined from MS data are largely captured by peptide binding predictions, enabling their replication in silico. This leads us to conclude that hotspots, to a great degree, are simply a result of promiscuous HLA binding, which disproves the hypothesis that the identification of hotspots provides novel information in the context of immunogenic peptide prediction. Furthermore, our analyses demonstrate that the signal of ligand processing, although present in the MS data, has very low predictive power to discriminate between MS and in silico defined hotspots.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MHC class I binding; hotspots; mass spectrometry; predicting peptide immunogenicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29446062      PMCID: PMC6002231          DOI: 10.1111/imm.12905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunology        ISSN: 0019-2805            Impact factor:   7.397


  17 in total

1.  Improved prediction of MHC class I and class II epitopes using a novel Gibbs sampling approach.

Authors:  Morten Nielsen; Claus Lundegaard; Peder Worning; Christina Sylvester Hvid; Kasper Lamberth; Søren Buus; Søren Brunak; Ole Lund
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Three regions of HIV-1 gp160 contain clusters of immunodominant CTL epitopes.

Authors:  P Shankar; J A Fabry; D M Fong; J Lieberman
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.685

3.  Mass Spectrometry Profiling of HLA-Associated Peptidomes in Mono-allelic Cells Enables More Accurate Epitope Prediction.

Authors:  Jennifer G Abelin; Derin B Keskin; Siranush Sarkizova; Christina R Hartigan; Wandi Zhang; John Sidney; Jonathan Stevens; William Lane; Guang Lan Zhang; Thomas M Eisenhaure; Karl R Clauser; Nir Hacohen; Michael S Rooney; Steven A Carr; Catherine J Wu
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 4.  Identification of Immunogenic Epitopes by MS/MS.

Authors:  Moreno Di Marco; Janet Kerstin Peper; Hans-Georg Rammensee
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.360

5.  Clustering patterns of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) proteins reveal imprints of immune evasion on HIV-1 global variation.

Authors:  Karina Yusim; Can Kesmir; Brian Gaschen; Marylyn M Addo; Marcus Altfeld; Søren Brunak; Alexandre Chigaev; Vincent Detours; Bette T Korber
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  MULTIPRED2: a computational system for large-scale identification of peptides predicted to bind to HLA supertypes and alleles.

Authors:  Guang Lan Zhang; David S DeLuca; Derin B Keskin; Lou Chitkushev; Tanya Zlateva; Ole Lund; Ellis L Reinherz; Vladimir Brusic
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  A quantitative analysis of the variables affecting the repertoire of T cell specificities recognized after vaccinia virus infection.

Authors:  Erika Assarsson; John Sidney; Carla Oseroff; Valerie Pasquetto; Huynh-Hoa Bui; Nicole Frahm; Christian Brander; Bjoern Peters; Howard Grey; Alessandro Sette
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Direct identification of clinically relevant neoepitopes presented on native human melanoma tissue by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Michal Bassani-Sternberg; Eva Bräunlein; Richard Klar; Thomas Engleitner; Pavel Sinitcyn; Stefan Audehm; Melanie Straub; Julia Weber; Julia Slotta-Huspenina; Katja Specht; Marc E Martignoni; Angelika Werner; Rüdiger Hein; Dirk H Busch; Christian Peschel; Roland Rad; Jürgen Cox; Matthias Mann; Angela M Krackhardt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Analysis of Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Immunopeptidomes Using Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Etienne Caron; Daniel J Kowalewski; Ching Chiek Koh; Theo Sturm; Heiko Schuster; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Genomic and bioinformatic profiling of mutational neoepitopes reveals new rules to predict anticancer immunogenicity.

Authors:  Fei Duan; Jorge Duitama; Sahar Al Seesi; Cory M Ayres; Steven A Corcelli; Arpita P Pawashe; Tatiana Blanchard; David McMahon; John Sidney; Alessandro Sette; Brian M Baker; Ion I Mandoiu; Pramod K Srivastava
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Mapping the tumour human leukocyte antigen (HLA) ligandome by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Lena Katharina Freudenmann; Ana Marcu; Stefan Stevanović
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 7.397

2.  New tools for MHC research from machine learning and predictive algorithms to the tumour immunopeptidome.

Authors:  Daniel M Altmann
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 3.  Predicting Antigen Presentation-What Could We Learn From a Million Peptides?

Authors:  David Gfeller; Michal Bassani-Sternberg
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  A Proteome-Wide Immunoinformatics Tool to Accelerate T-Cell Epitope Discovery and Vaccine Design in the Context of Emerging Infectious Diseases: An Ethnicity-Oriented Approach.

Authors:  Patricio Oyarzun; Manju Kashyap; Victor Fica; Alexis Salas-Burgos; Faviel F Gonzalez-Galarza; Antony McCabe; Andrew R Jones; Derek Middleton; Bostjan Kobe
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Challenges targeting cancer neoantigens in 2021: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Ina Chen; Michael Y Chen; S Peter Goedegebuure; William E Gillanders
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.683

Review 6.  Know thy immune self and non-self: Proteomics informs on the expanse of self and non-self, and how and where they arise.

Authors:  Sebastian Joyce; Nicola Ternette
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.