| Literature DB >> 29445077 |
Koroush Khalighi1,2, Amirsina Talebian2, Rubinder Singh Toor2,3, Seyed Abbas Mirabbasi4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. It increases the risk of stroke by at least five-fold and is associated with higher risk for mortality and morbidity. Therefore, prompt diagnosis and treatment is crucial. In addition to anti-coagulation therapy, electrical and pharmacological cardioversion to restore sinus rhythm remains the standard of care. The most common and effective method for electrical cardioversion is achieved with placement of electrodes in the anteroposterior position. CASE REPORT We present three cases of patients with initial unsuccessful cardioversion attempts for persistent atrial fibrillation. These patients had elevated body mass indices and large trans-thoracic diameters. Their initial external cardioversion via the conventional method was not successful for restoration of sinus rhythm. This failure may have been attributed to their body habitus. To ensure that the current would traverse through the atrial tissue, the electrode pads were applied using fluoroscopic guidance for adequate myocardial depolarization. CONCLUSIONS Optimal fluoroscopic placement of the electrode pads during external cardioversion procedure increases the odds of successful restoration of sinus rhythm when compared to the conventional method.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29445077 PMCID: PMC5822935 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.907143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Case Rep ISSN: 1941-5923
Figure 1.LAO view. The left photograph depicts the electrodes placed in anteroposterior position. The larger circle is the anterior electrode and the smaller circle is the posterior electrode. This conventional positioning of electrodes failed to convert the patient to normal sinus rhythm. The right photograph depicts the electrodes placed by fluoroscopic guidance. The larger circle is the anterior electrode and the smaller circle is the posterior electrode. This position of the electrodes allowed the current to transverse between the electrodes through the atria and converted the patient to sinus rhythm.
Figure 2.RAO view. The left photograph depicts the electrodes placed in anteroposterior position. The larger circle is the anterior electrode and the smaller circle is the posterior electrode. This conventional positioning of electrodes failed to convert the patient to normal sinus rhythm. The right photograph depicts the electrodes placed by fluoroscopic guidance. The larger circle is the anterior electrode and the smaller circle is the posterior electrode. This position of the electrodes allowed the current to transverse between the electrodes through the atria and converted the patient to sinus rhythm.
Figure 3.The left photograph is the RAO view; the middle photograph is the AP view; the right photograph is the LAO view. The electrodes were placed under fluoroscopic guidance to ensure that the current between the electrodes traversed the atria efficiently. This positioning converted the patient to sinus rhythm.