Literature DB >> 29445042

Working dogs transfer different tasks in reciprocal cooperation.

Nastassja Gfrerer1, Michael Taborsky2.   

Abstract

Direct reciprocity can establish stable cooperation among unrelated individuals. It is a common assumption of direct reciprocity models that agents exchange like with like, but this is not necessarily true for natural interactions. It is yet unclear whether animals apply direct reciprocity rules when successive altruistic help involves different tasks. Here, we tested whether working dogs transfer help from one to another cooperative task in an iterated prisoner's dilemma paradigm. In our experiment, individual dogs received help to obtain food from a conspecific, which involved a specific task. Subsequently, the focal subject could return received favour by using a different task. Working dogs transferred the cooperative experience received through one task by applying an alternative task when they helped a previously cooperative partner. By contrast, they refrained from helping previously defecting partners. This suggests that dogs realize the cooperative act of a conspecific, which changes their propensity to provide help to that partner by different means. The ability of animals to transfer different tasks when helping a social partner by satisfying the criteria of direct reciprocity might explain the frequent occurrence of reciprocal cooperation in nature.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  altruism; domestic dog; generalization; reciprocity; task exchange

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29445042      PMCID: PMC5830657          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  8 in total

1.  The evolution of cooperation based on direct fitness benefits.

Authors:  Michael Taborsky; Joachim G Frommen; Christina Riehl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  R Axelrod; W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Attitudinal reciprocity in food sharing among brown capuchin monkeys.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 4.  Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Stevens; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Reciprocal Exchange Patterned by Market Forces Helps Explain Cooperation in a Small-Scale Society.

Authors:  Adrian V Jaeggi; Paul L Hooper; Bret A Beheim; Hillard Kaplan; Michael Gurven
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Food sharing in vampire bats: reciprocal help predicts donations more than relatedness or harassment.

Authors:  Gerald G Carter; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Working dogs cooperate among one another by generalised reciprocity.

Authors:  Nastassja Gfrerer; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Familiarity affects other-regarding preferences in pet dogs.

Authors:  Mylene Quervel-Chaumette; Rachel Dale; Sarah Marshall-Pescini; Friederike Range
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  The smell of cooperation: rats increase helpful behaviour when receiving odour cues of a conspecific performing a cooperative task.

Authors:  Nina Gerber; Manon K Schweinfurth; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Inequity aversion in dogs: a review.

Authors:  Jim McGetrick; Friederike Range
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.