| Literature DB >> 29444637 |
Pei Cao1,2, Dajin Yang2, Jianghui Zhu2, Zhaoping Liu2, Dingguo Jiang2, Haibin Xu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: China has the world's largest tea plantation area in the world. To sustain high yields of the tea, multiple pesticides are used on tea crops to control pests. Organophosphorus (OP) pesticides are among the most widely used types of agricultural pesticides in China. As tea is a significant potential source of exposure to pesticide residues, the public concern has increased in relation to pesticide residues found in tea in China. The aim of the study was to estimate cumulative dietary exposure to OP residues from tea infusion for Chinese tea consumers to determine whether exposure to OP residues from tea infusion is a cause of health concern for tea consumers in China.Entities:
Keywords: Cumulative dietary exposure; Organophosphorus residues; Risk assessment; Tea infusion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29444637 PMCID: PMC5813321 DOI: 10.1186/s12199-018-0696-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Prev Med ISSN: 1342-078X Impact factor: 3.674
Description and distribution of variables and models for dietary exposure assessment of OP residues in tea infusion
| Compound | Variables | Definition | Assumption/distribution/formula | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPs |
| Concentration in methamidophos equivalents of OPs in tea infusion (detected value) | Monitoring data | |
|
| Concentration in methamidophos equivalents of OPs in tea infusion (undetected value) | Monitoring data | ||
|
| Concentrationin in methamidophos equivalents of OPs in tea infusion (detected value) | Monitoring data | ||
|
| Concentration in methamidophos equivalents of OPs in tea infusion (undetected value) | Monitoring data | ||
|
| Rate of sample with detectable | 10.11%a | Calculated | |
| 13.53%b | ||||
| 6.20%c | ||||
|
| Rate of sample with undetectable | 89.89%a | Calculated | |
| 86.47%b | ||||
| 93.80%c | ||||
|
| Concentration in methamidophos equivalents of OPs in tea infusion | Discrete ( | Calculated | |
|
| Transfer rate | 87.4% | Based on the open scientific literatures to calculate | |
| 22.1% | ||||
| 2.8% | ||||
|
| The consumption of tea | China National Nutrient and Health Survey | ||
|
| Body weight for tea consumers | China National Nutrient and Health Survey |
For Conc and Conc mark with an asterisk (*), RPFs were calculated based on CED at 20% AChE inhibition in rat brain, IC for OPs is methamidophos
For Conc and Conc, RPFs were calculated based on BMDat 10% AChE inhibition in rat brain, IC for OPs is methamidophos
The 87.4, 22.1 and 2.8% were TRs of soluble OPs, moderately soluble OPs and low soluble OPs, respectively
aNon-fermented tea
bSemi-fermented tea
cFermented tea
Concentrations of OPs in tea from the 2013–2014 National Monitoring Program
| OPs | Samples analysed | Detected samples | Positive rate (%) | Concentrations of detected samples in tea (mg/kg) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | P50 | P95 | P97.5 | P99.9 | Max | ||||
| Chlorpyrifos | 1660 | 112 | 6.75 | 0.138 | 0.060 | 0.594 | 0.788 | 1.900 | 1.900 |
| Triazophos | 1619 | 42 | 2.59 | 0.152 | 0.125 | 0.427 | 0.801 | 0.830 | 0.830 |
| Disulfoton | 1623 | 12 | 0.74 | 0.265 | 0.295 | 0.706 | 0.706 | 0.706 | 0.706 |
| Dimethoate | 1642 | 11 | 0.67 | 0.261 | 0.220 | 0.980 | 0.980 | 0.980 | 0.980 |
| Monocrotophos | 1634 | 10 | 0.61 | 0.201 | 0.095 | 0.909 | 0.909 | 0.909 | 0.909 |
| Parathion-methyl | 1646 | 10 | 0.61 | 0.052 | 0.041 | 0.162 | 0.162 | 0.162 | 0.162 |
| Ethion | 1638 | 9 | 0.55 | 0.066 | 0.020 | 0.240 | 0.240 | 0.240 | 0.240 |
| Tolclofos-methyl | 386 | 2 | 0.52 | 0.080 | 0.080 | 0.080 | 0.080 | 0.080 | 0.080 |
| Acephate | 1635 | 8 | 0.49 | 0.033 | 0.031 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 |
| Methamidophos | 1640 | 8 | 0.49 | 0.057 | 0.033 | 0.120 | 0.120 | 0.120 | 0.120 |
| Dichlorvos | 1638 | 7 | 0.43 | 0.055 | 0.014 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 |
| Omethoate | 1628 | 6 | 0.37 | 0.068 | 0.070 | 0.930 | 0.930 | 0.930 | 0.930 |
| Fenitrothion | 1638 | 6 | 0.37 | 0.033 | 0.016 | 0.100 | 0.100 | 0.100 | 0.100 |
| Parathion | 1642 | 6 | 0.37 | 0.024 | 0.008 | 0.073 | 0.073 | 0.073 | 0.073 |
| Phorate | 1649 | 6 | 0.36 | 0.006 | 0.003 | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.017 |
| Chlorpyrifos-methyl | 1598 | 5 | 0.31 | 0.020 | 0.005 | 0.080 | 0.080 | 0.080 | 0.080 |
| Phosalone | 1616 | 5 | 0.31 | 0.047 | 0.025 | 0.152 | 0.152 | 0.152 | 0.152 |
| Methidathion | 1629 | 5 | 0.31 | 0.076 | 0.044 | 0.170 | 0.170 | 0.170 | 0.170 |
| Phosmet | 1575 | 3 | 0.19 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 |
| Malathion | 1645 | 3 | 0.18 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Pyridaphethione | 40 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Diazinon | 6 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Trichlorfon | 3 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Quinalphos | 3 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Phoxim | 3 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Summary of residue data of OP pesticides detected on tea samples analysed in China Monitoring Program
| Number of detected pesticides in samples | Non-fermented tea | Semi-fermented tea | Fermented tea |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of detected samples | Number of detected samples | Number of detected samples | |
| 0 | 1031 | 230 | 257 |
| 1 | 84 | 33 | 12 |
| 2 | 21 | 1 | 5 |
| 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| ≥ 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Total of detected samples | 116 | 36 | 17 |
| Total of number of samples | 1147 | 266 | 274 |
Detailed consumption data of tea consumers in China
| Tea category | Consumption of dry tea leaves (g/d) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | P50 | P90 | P95 | P97.5 | Max | |
| Non-fermented green tea | 3.92 | 1.70 | 11.09 | 16.70 | 25.00 | 41.70 |
| Partly fermented oolong tea | 4.42 | 3.40 | 9.98 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Fermented black tea | 9.83 | 10.00 | 19.80 | 25.00 | 48.80 | 61.90 |
P percentile, Max maximum
Percentiles of distribution for dietary intake of Ops residues from tea infusion for tea consumers only in China
| Percentiles of exposure | OPsa (μg/kg bw/d) | OPsb (μg/kg bw/d) |
|---|---|---|
| Tea consumer | ||
| Mean | 0.02 (0.02–0.02)c | 0.08 (0.08–0.09)c |
| P50 | 0.01 (0.01–0.01) | 0.05 (0.05–0.05) |
| P90 | 0.04 (0.04–0.06) | 0.17 (0.17–0.25) |
| P95 | 0.06 (0.05–0.06) | 0.25 (0.24–0.25) |
| P97.5 | 0.08 (0.07–0.08) | 0.33 (0.32–0.35) |
| P99 | 0.11 (0.10–0.12) | 0.46 (0.44–0.50) |
| P99.9 | 0.25 (0.20–0.30) | 1.08 (0.85–1.23) |
aRPFs calculated by BMD10, IC for OPs is methamidophos
bRPFs calculated by CED20, IC for OPs is methamidophos
cNumbers with brackets are the lower (2.5%) and upper (97.5%) bounds of the 95% confidence interval of the corresponding percentiles of exposure
Fig. 1Sensitivity analysis of cumulative dietary exposure to OP residues from tea infusion
Fig. 2Two types of RPFs calculated by BMD10 and CED20 inhibition in the female rat brain after 21 days exposure to OPs