Literature DB >> 29444376

Secukinumab demonstrates high sustained efficacy and a favourable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis through 5 years of treatment (SCULPTURE Extension Study).

R Bissonnette1, T Luger2, D Thaçi3, D Toth4, A Lacombe5, S Xia6, R Mazur5, M Patekar5, P Charef5, M Milutinovic5, C Leonardi7, U Mrowietz8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes IL-17A, has been shown to have significant efficacy and a favourable safety profile in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of secukinumab through 5 years of treatment in moderate-to-severe psoriasis.
METHODS: In the core SCULPTURE study, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 responders at Week 12 continued receiving subcutaneous secukinumab until Year 1. Thereafter, patients entered the extension phase and continued treatment as per the core trial. Treatment was double-blinded until the end of Year 3 and open-label from Year 4. Here, we focus on the 300 mg fixed-interval (every 4 weeks) treatment, the recommended per label dose. Efficacy data are primarily reported as observed, but multiple imputation (MI) and last observation carried forward (LOCF) techniques were also undertaken as supportive analyses.
RESULTS: At Year 1, 168 patients entered the extension study and at the end of Year 5, 126 patients completed 300 mg (every 4 weeks) treatment. PASI 75/90/100 responses at Year 1 (88.9%, 68.5% and 43.8%, respectively) were sustained to Year 5 (88.5%, 66.4% and 41%). PASI responses were consistent regardless of the analysis undertaken (as observed, MI, or LOCF). The average improvement in mean PASI was approximately 90% through 5 years compared with core study baseline. DLQI (dermatology life quality index) 0/1 response also sustained through 5 years (72.7% at Year 1 and 65.5% at Year 5). The safety profile of secukinumab remained favourable, with no cumulative or unexpected safety concerns identified.
CONCLUSION: Secukinumab 300 mg treatment delivered high and sustained levels of skin clearance and improved quality of life through 5 years in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Favourable safety established in the secukinumab phase 2/3 programme was maintained through 5 years.
© 2018 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29444376      PMCID: PMC6175198          DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   6.166


Introduction

Psoriasis is a chronic immune‐mediated skin disease characterized by scaly erythematous plaques that potentially requires lifelong disease management. Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes IL‐17A, has been shown to have significant efficacy in the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, demonstrating high levels of efficacy with a favourable safety profile.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 The recommended (per label) dose of secukinumab is 300 mg subcutaneous. As psoriasis is a condition requiring long‐term treatment, longitudinal data establishing the efficacy and safety of approved therapies are important for physicians and patients. Having previously demonstrated the sustained efficacy and favourable safety of secukinumab through 3 years of treatment in moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis patients;6 here, we present data through 5 years.

Materials and methods

Study design

In the core SCULPTURE study, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 responders (≥75% improvement from baseline PASI score) at Week 12 were randomized to fixed‐interval (FI; 150 mg or 300 mg), or retreatment‐as‐needed (RAN; 150 mg or 300 mg) regimens, as described previously in Mrowietz et al.7 The 300 mg FI cohort received subcutaneous secukinumab every 4 weeks. Patients who completed 52 weeks of treatment continued into the extension study (CAIN457A2304E1) and received the same blinded maintenance treatment regimen and dose up to the end of Year 3. The study was open‐label from Year 4 with treatment mainly self‐injected at home; patients attended site visits every 12–16 weeks. No additional active therapies (topicals or systemic) were permitted in the extension study with the exception of topical treatments applied to the face, scalp and/or genitoanal area for up to 14 consecutive days. Here, we report long‐term results for the secukinumab 300 mg FI arm only, which is the recommended labelled dose regimen.

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

Eligibility criteria for the SCULPTURE core study have been described in detail previously.7 Briefly, subjects were age ≥18 years and had a diagnosis (≥6 months prior to randomization) of chronic moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis [absolute PASI score ≥12; Investigator's Global Assessment 2011 modified version (IGA mod 2011) score of ≥3; body surface area (BSA) involvement ≥10%]. Additionally, subjects were required to have a history of inadequate psoriasis control with topical treatments, phototherapy, systemic therapy or a combination of these.7 Subjects were excluded from the study if they had any form of psoriasis other than chronic plaque‐type psoriasis, if they had current drug‐induced psoriasis or if they had previously used secukinumab or any drug that targets IL‐17 or the IL‐17 receptor.

Study objectives

The objectives of this study were to assess the long‐term efficacy and safety of secukinumab through 5 years of treatment. Efficacy assessments included PASI responses, absolute PASI and BSA score, dermatology life quality index (DLQI) 0/1 response (no effect of skin disease on quality of life), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ‐DI) response (an improvement of at least 0.3 score points compared to baseline; undertaken for patients with concomitant psoriatic arthritis only). Safety assessments consisted of adverse event (AE) assessment, physical examination, electrocardiograms and monitoring of vital signs and laboratory values.

Statistical methods

Primary analyses for all efficacy measures (PASI 75/90/100 responses, mean absolute and % change from baseline for PASI and BSA, absolute PASI ≤1/≤2/≤3/≤5 responses, BSA ≤1/≤2/≤3/≤5 responses, DLQI 0/1 responses and HAQ‐DI responses) were undertaken using observed values without imputation of missing values. Additionally, multiple imputation (MI) and last observation carried forward (LOCF) were used as a sensitivity analyses for PASI and BSA measures. The as‐observed analysis assessed treatment efficacy for patients who completed an assessment at each visit only. The MI analysis evaluated treatment efficacy for all randomized patients by imputing the missing values based on the missing‐at‐random assumption, while the LOCF analysis imputed the missing values by the last available measurement for each patient. Safety events were analysed per year using exposure‐adjusted incidence rates (patient incidence rates per 100 patient‐years). A patient with multiple occurrences of the same AE in a year interval was counted once, while a patient with multiple occurrences of the same AE in different year intervals was counted for each year.

Study oversight

The extension study protocol was approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee at each participating site, and the study was conducted in accordance with the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. US sites maintained compliance with HIPAA regulations. All eligible patients provided written consent. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01640951).

Results

Baseline characteristics and subject disposition

Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics of extension study patients (n = 168) are presented in Table 1. The mean PASI of 23.5, BSA involvement of 33.1%, mean DLQI of 13.1, and a mean time since first psoriasis diagnosis of 19.1 years, indicated a high disease severity at baseline. Additionally, 19.6% of patients had a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis.
Table 1

Characteristics of extension study subjects at core study baseline

CharacteristicsSecukinumab 300 mg FI (n = 168)
Age, years (Mean ± SD)48.5 ± 12.5
Gender‐Male, n (%)118 (70.2)
Race‐Caucasian, n (%)132 (78.6)
Bodyweight, kg (Mean ± SD)85.5 ± 21.3
BMI, kg/m2 (Mean ± SD)28.7 ± 6.2
Time since first psoriasis diagnosis, years (Mean ± SD)19.1 ± 13.4
PASI (Mean ± SD)23.5 ± 8.8
BSA affected, % (Mean ± SD)33.1 ± 18.9
DLQI (Mean ± SD)13.1 ± 7.4
Psoriatic arthritis present, n (%)33 (19.6)
Previous systemic treatment, n (%)
Any120 (71.4)
Biologic56 (33.3)

BMI, body mass index; BSA, body surface area; DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; FI, fixed‐interval; n, number of evaluable subjects; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; SD, standard deviation.

Characteristics of extension study subjects at core study baseline BMI, body mass index; BSA, body surface area; DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; FI, fixed‐interval; n, number of evaluable subjects; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; SD, standard deviation. On completion of the 1‐year core study, 168 subjects in the 300 mg FI cohort entered the extension study; at the end of Year 5, 126 subjects had completed the treatment phase of the study (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Subject disposition in the secukinumab 300 mg fixed‐interval treatment arm.

Subject disposition in the secukinumab 300 mg fixed‐interval treatment arm.

Efficacy and patient reported outcomes

Efficacy outcomes – relative to baseline

Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75, 90 and 100 response rates sustained from Year 1 (88.9%, 68.5% and 43.8%, respectively) to Year 5 (88.5%, 66.4% and 41%; Fig. 2 and Table S1). PASI responses were consistent across the different analyses undertaken: PASI 75, 90 and 100 response rates were sustained to Year 5 in the MI (80.1%, 58.6% and 35.6%) and LOCF (79.2%, 59.5% and 37.5%) analyses (Fig. 2 and Table S1).
Figure 2

Percentage of patients with PASI 75/90/100 response from Year 1 to Year 5.

Percentage of patients with PASI 75/90/100 response from Year 1 to Year 5. Secukinumab improved psoriasis on average by 90% through 5 years; the mean improvement in mean absolute PASI from baseline to Year 1 was 91.1%, and from baseline to Year 5 was 90.1% (Fig. 3). Similarly, there were sustained improvements in mean absolute BSA from baseline to Year 1 (92.2%) and Year 5 (91.8%) (Fig. 4).
Figure 3

Mean percentage change (improvement) from baseline in mean absolute PASI.

Figure 4

Mean percentage change (improvement) from baseline in mean BSA.

Mean percentage change (improvement) from baseline in mean absolute PASI. Mean percentage change (improvement) from baseline in mean BSA.

Efficacy outcomes – absolute values

Absolute PASI ≤5/≤3/≤2/≤1 responses sustained from Year 1 (87.7%, 74.1%, 67.9% and 58.6%, respectively) through to Year 5 (84.4%, 75.4%, 66.4% and 53.3%; Fig. 5 and Table S2). Similarly, PASI ≤5/≤3/≤2/≤1 responses sustained to Year 5 in the MI (76.4%, 66.9%, 58.4% and 47%) and LOCF (76.2%, 69%, 60.1% and 48.2%) analyses (Fig. 5 and Table S2).
Figure 5

Percentage of patients with mean absolute PASI responses by category from Year 1 to Year 5.

Percentage of patients with mean absolute PASI responses by category from Year 1 to Year 5. Mean absolute PASI at Year 1 and Year 5 was 2.1 and 2.4, respectively, indicating long‐term maintenance of efficacy (Fig. 6). The maintenance of individual patients' absolute PASI through 5 years of treatment can be observed in a time‐lapse video provided as Video S1.
Figure 6

Mean absolute PASI from Year 1 to Year 5.

Mean absolute PASI from Year 1 to Year 5. Body surface area ≤5/≤3/≤2/≤1 response rates sustained from Year 1 (85.2%, 77.2%, 73.5% and 60.5%, respectively) through to Year 5 (85.2%, 78.7%, 71.3% and 62.3%; Fig. 7 and Table S3). Similarly, these response rates sustained to Year 5 in the MI (76.9%, 69.8%, 62.8% and 54.5%) and LOCF (78%, 71.4%, 63.7% and 56.5%) analyses (Fig. 7 and Table S3).
Figure 7

Proportion of patients with BSA affected by category from Year 1 to Year 5.

Proportion of patients with BSA affected by category from Year 1 to Year 5. Mean absolute BSA was consistently low through 5 years of treatment (2.5% at Year 1 and 2.8% at Year 5; Fig. 8).
Figure 8

Mean absolute BSA from Year 1 to Year 5.

Mean absolute BSA from Year 1 to Year 5.

Patient‐reported outcomes (DLQI and HAQ‐DI)

Secukinumab lead to high and sustained improvement in patients' quality of life affected by their skin and/or concomitant psoriatic arthritis (Figs 9 and 10, respectively). DLQI 0/1 response (indicating no impact of skin problems on patients' lives) at Year 1 was 72.7%, which was well maintained to 65.5% at Year 5. The maintenance of individual patients' DLQI through 5 years of treatment can be observed in a time‐lapse video provided as Video S2. In patients with psoriatic arthritis at baseline (n = 33), 32.0% were considered HAQ‐DI responders at Year 1 (improvement of at least 0.3 points from baseline, which represents minimal clinically important difference), and this sustained to 36.4% at Year 5 (Fig. 10).
Figure 9

Percentage of patients with DLQI 0/1 response from Year 1 to Year 5.

Figure 10

Percentage of patients with HAQ‐DI response from Year 1 to Year 5.

Percentage of patients with DLQI 0/1 response from Year 1 to Year 5. Percentage of patients with HAQ‐DI response from Year 1 to Year 5.

Treatment compliance

In years 4 and 5, when patients mainly self‐administered therapy at home, treatment compliance (as measured by the percentage of non‐missed self‐administrations) was 99.5%.

Safety

The safety profile of secukinumab 300 mg remained favourable to Year 5 with no increase in yearly AE rates from Year 1 (Table 2). The most common AEs in the overall study population, which included nasopharyngitis, back pain and headache, were consistent with those reported in the core study7 and previous phase III studies.8 There was one death in Year 5 due to a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) in a patient that had ≥2 pre‐existing MACE risk factors and was not considered by the investigators to be related to study drug.
Table 2

Treatment‐emergent AEs by year

Treatment‐emergent AEsa Year 1 N = 168 168 PY n (IR)Year 2 N = 168 162.8 PY n (IR)Year 3 N = 157 148.8 PY n (IR)Year 4 N = 142 136.5 PY n (IR)Year 5 N = 134 142 PY n (IR)
Any AE(s)131 (204.6)126 (166.3)109 (139.2)91 (118.5)77 (87.2)
Death0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (0.7)b
Non‐fatal SAEs14 (8.8)11 (6.9)13 (9.1)13 (10.1)11 (8.0)
Most frequent AEs
Nasopharyngitis30 (20.1)27 (18.1)25 (18.8)17 (13.5)15 (11.1)
Hypertension11 (6.8)8 (5.1)3 (2.0)7 (5.3)5 (3.6)
Back pain7 (4.3)9 (5.7)9 (6.2)3 (2.2)3 (2.1)
URTI12 (7.5)11 (7.1)5 (3.5)5 (3.8)5 (3.6)
Headache10 (6.2)7 (4.4)4 (2.7)3 (2.2)1 (0.7)
Selected AEs
Opportunistic infections (other than TB and candidiasis)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0)
Tuberculosis0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0)
Candida infections
Vulvovaginal candidiasis3 (1.8)3 (1.9)1 (0.7)0 (0.0)0 (0)
Oral candidiasis0 (0.0)1 (0.6)0 (0.0)1 (0.7)0 (0.0)
Neutropenia0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
MACE0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (0.7)1 (0.7)b
Inflammatory bowel disease
Crohn's disease0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Ulcerative colitis0 (0.0)2 (1.2)c 1 (0.7)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Malignant or unspecified tumours (excl. NMSC)0 (0.0)2 (1.2)d 0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (0.7)e

Patient exposure is calculated as a sum of individual subject durations in days divided by 365 for each interval.

Death was due to MACE, which was not considered by the investigators to be related to study drug; patient had ≥2 pre‐existing MACE risk factors.

Of the two cases of ulcerative colitis in Year 2, one case was an exacerbation of previously existing ulcerative colitis; the exposure‐adjusted incidence rate for new‐onset ulcerative colitis cases for the entire study duration (5 years) was 0.27.

One case of cholangiocarcinoma, one case of invasive ductal breast carcinoma.

One case of breast cancer.

Only subjects who completed the SCULPTURE core study and continued into the extension are included in this analysis. A subject with multiple occurrences of the same AE in a one‐year interval was counted only once, while a subject with multiple occurrences of the same AE in different year intervals was counted for each year.

AE, adverse event; IR, incidence rate per 100 subject‐years; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; NMSC, non‐melanoma skin cancer; PY, patient‐years of exposure; SAE, serious adverse event; TB, tuberculosis; URTI, upper respiratory tract infection.

Treatment‐emergent AEs by year Patient exposure is calculated as a sum of individual subject durations in days divided by 365 for each interval. Death was due to MACE, which was not considered by the investigators to be related to study drug; patient had ≥2 pre‐existing MACE risk factors. Of the two cases of ulcerative colitis in Year 2, one case was an exacerbation of previously existing ulcerative colitis; the exposure‐adjusted incidence rate for new‐onset ulcerative colitis cases for the entire study duration (5 years) was 0.27. One case of cholangiocarcinoma, one case of invasive ductal breast carcinoma. One case of breast cancer. Only subjects who completed the SCULPTURE core study and continued into the extension are included in this analysis. A subject with multiple occurrences of the same AE in a one‐year interval was counted only once, while a subject with multiple occurrences of the same AE in different year intervals was counted for each year. AE, adverse event; IR, incidence rate per 100 subject‐years; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; NMSC, non‐melanoma skin cancer; PY, patient‐years of exposure; SAE, serious adverse event; TB, tuberculosis; URTI, upper respiratory tract infection. Regarding selected AEs, nine candida infections were reported through 5 years of treatment (seven vulvovaginal and two oral), but these occurred in five patients. All candidiasis occurrences were mild or moderate, and none led to study treatment discontinuation. Three cases of ulcerative colitis were reported over 5 years; one of these was an exacerbation of previously existing ulcerative colitis. The following malignancies or unspecified tumours were reported: two cases in Year 2 (one case of cholangiocarcinoma, one case of invasive ductal breast carcinoma), none in Year 3 or 4, and one case in Year 5 (one case of breast cancer). There were no reported opportunistic or tuberculosis infections (new or reactivations of latent tuberculosis) through 5 years of treatment.

Discussion

Most moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis patients will require long‐term treatment with biological agents to control their disease. While the short‐term effects of biologics in moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis are well documented, studies examining long‐term efficacy and safety are more limited. Apart from secukinumab, only ustekinumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety up to 5 years of treatment for moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis in phase III clinical trials.9, 10 However, dose and/or dose‐interval adjustments not included in the label were permitted for the overall population in these ustekinumab investigations,9, 10 and the blinded study phase extended to 52 weeks only.9 Moreover, low and mid‐potency topical corticosteroids were permitted in the long‐term extension phase (from week 76).10 In real‐world evidence studies, sustained response has also been reported for ustekinumab,11, 12 but again dose and/or dose‐interval adjustments were undertaken. For TNFα blockers, efficacy and safety from clinical trials have been presented over shorter time periods (3 years for adalimumab13 and 2 years for etanercept14), with real‐world evidence studies only, beyond this.12, 15, 16, 17 In these real‐world evidence analyses, dropout rates were high, and concomitant treatments were permitted,12, 15, 16, 17 and in some instances, dose adjustments were undertaken.12, 17 For other IL‐17A inhibitors, to our knowledge no phase 3 results have been published beyond 108 weeks,18 so further long‐term data are required before any sustainability conclusions can be drawn. The present secukinumab study provides the first phase III results of an IL‐17A agent demonstrating sustained efficacy and safety up to 5 years of treatment at the approved dose regimen. Apart from the secukinumab 300 mg every 4 weeks regimen (that could not be altered during the study), no use of additional therapies was permitted (except short‐term use of topicals in limited body areas for up to 14 days). We can conclude, therefore, that the secukinumab efficacy results reported here are robust and without the effect of any meaningful confounders. The double‐blind design was maintained for the first 3 years of treatment. Dropout rates in this long‐term secukinumab study were low (comparable to previous phase 3 long‐term studies),10 only 4% (seven patients) discontinued due to a lack of efficacy (Fig. 1), and almost 100% of response rates were sustained. Before commencing secukinumab treatment, patients had on average one‐third of their body covered with psoriasis, an average PASI of 23.5 and their skin disease had a very large effect on their quality of life (mean DLQI of 13.1). Despite such severe disease, psoriasis was effectively and consistently controlled through 5 years, regardless of the efficacy response criteria and type of analysis undertaken (with or without imputation). On average, the extent and severity of psoriasis were improved by approximately 90% through 5 years. Up to three‐quarters of patients also achieved high levels of response as per recently suggested treatment goals in psoriasis proposed by the National Psoriasis Foundation (BSA ≤1),19 and a Canadian expert task‐force (PASI ≤3).20 Efficacy reported by physicians was translated into improvements of quality of life reported by patients, including high and sustained DLQI 0/1 responses (representing no effect of skin disease on their lives) and HAQ‐DI responses (representing functional improvements in patients with concomitant psoriatic arthritis) through 5 years. The safety profile of secukinumab remained favourable through 5 years of treatment with no increase in yearly AE rates from Year 1. No new safety signals were identified, and the safety profile was consistent with that established in the secukinumab phase 2/3 clinical programme.2, 8, 21, 22 High patient retention and almost 100% treatment compliance (seen during the last 2 years of treatment when patients mainly self‐administered therapy at home) highlight the favourable long‐term tolerability and patient satisfaction with secukinumab treatment. A potential limitation of this study is that patients were selected by a number of inclusion and exclusion criteria when entering the SCULPTURE trial and therefore may not be representative of a real‐world patient population as compared to data from registries.23 The safety profile over a period of 5 years was favourable, but the conclusions of safety are limited by the sample size examined in this extension study (n = 168). Over 140 000 patients have been treated with secukinumab for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis to date since first becoming available in the clinic (Novartis 2018, data on file). This extension study demonstrates that secukinumab 300 mg delivers strong and long‐lasting sustained efficacy in treating patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis through 5 years. Improvements in health‐related quality of life also maintained through 5 years. These data are particularly relevant to treatment selection in psoriasis, given the potential requirement for long‐term disease management. Table S1. Percentage of patients with PASI 75/90/100 response at Year 1 and Year 5. Table S2. Percentage of patients with mean absolute PASI responses by category at Year 1 and Year 5. Table S3. Proportion of patients with BSA affected by category at Year 1 and Year 5. Click here for additional data file. Video S1. Time‐lapse of individual patients' absolute PASI through 5 years of secukinumab treatment Click here for additional data file. Video S2. Time‐lapse of individual patients' DLQI through 5 years of secukinumab treatment Click here for additional data file.
  23 in total

1.  Effects of AIN457, a fully human antibody to interleukin-17A, on psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and uveitis.

Authors:  Wolfgang Hueber; Dhavalkumar D Patel; Thaddeus Dryja; Andrew M Wright; Irina Koroleva; Gerard Bruin; Christian Antoni; Zoe Draelos; Michael H Gold; Patrick Durez; Paul P Tak; Juan J Gomez-Reino; C Stephen Foster; Rosa Y Kim; C Michael Samson; Naomi S Falk; David S Chu; David Callanan; Quan Dong Nguyen; Kristine Rose; Asifa Haider; Franco Di Padova
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Inclusion and exclusion criteria in phase III trials with systemic agents in psoriasis: the external validity of drug development.

Authors:  N Kirsten; C Bulai Livideanu; M A Richard; M P Konstantinou; A Khemis; C Balluteaud; C Goujon; M Beylot-Barry; C Paul
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 9.302

3.  Secukinumab Inhibition of Interleukin-17A in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.

Authors:  Philip J Mease; Iain B McInnes; Bruce Kirkham; Arthur Kavanaugh; Proton Rahman; Désirée van der Heijde; Robert Landewé; Peter Nash; Luminita Pricop; Jiacheng Yuan; Hanno B Richards; Shephard Mpofu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation: Treatment targets for plaque psoriasis.

Authors:  April W Armstrong; Michael P Siegel; Jerry Bagel; Erin E Boh; Megan Buell; Kevin D Cooper; Kristina Callis Duffin; Lawrence F Eichenfield; Amit Garg; Joel M Gelfand; Alice B Gottlieb; John Y M Koo; Neil J Korman; Gerald G Krueger; Mark G Lebwohl; Craig L Leonardi; Arthur M Mandelin; M Alan Menter; Joseph F Merola; David M Pariser; Ronald B Prussick; Caitriona Ryan; Kara N Shah; Jeffrey M Weinberg; MaryJane O U Williams; Jashin J Wu; Paul S Yamauchi; Abby S Van Voorhees
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Secukinumab sustains good efficacy and favourable safety in moderate-to-severe psoriasis after up to 3 years of treatment: results from a double-blind extension study.

Authors:  R Bissonnette; T Luger; D Thaçi; D Toth; I Messina; R You; A Guana; T Fox; C Papavassilis; I Gilloteau; U Mrowietz
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 9.302

6.  Assessment of the long-term safety and effectiveness of etanercept for the treatment of psoriasis in an adult population.

Authors:  Kim A Papp; Yves Poulin; Robert Bissonnette; Marc Bourcier; Darryl Toth; Leslie Rosoph; Melanie Poulin-Costello; Mike Setterfield; Jerry Syrotuik
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 11.527

7.  Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: CLEAR, a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Diamant Thaçi; Andrew Blauvelt; Kristian Reich; Tsen-Fang Tsai; Francisco Vanaclocha; Külli Kingo; Michael Ziv; Andreas Pinter; Sophie Hugot; Ruquan You; Marina Milutinovic
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 11.527

8.  Secukinumab retreatment-as-needed versus fixed-interval maintenance regimen for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: A randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial (SCULPTURE).

Authors:  Ulrich Mrowietz; Craig L Leonardi; Giampiero Girolomoni; Darryl Toth; Akimichi Morita; Shyamal A Balki; Jacek C Szepietowski; Pascaline Regnault; Helen Thurston; Charis Papavassilis
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 11.527

9.  Comparison of the 1- and 5-year effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab in patients with psoriasis in daily clinical practice: results from the prospective BioCAPTURE registry.

Authors:  J Zweegers; J M M Groenewoud; J M P A van den Reek; M E Otero; P C M van de Kerkhof; R J B Driessen; P P M van Lümig; M D Njoo; P M Ossenkoppele; J M Mommers; M I A Koetsier; W P Arnold; M P M Andriessen; A L A Kuijpers; M A M Berends; W Kievit; E M G J de Jong
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 9.302

10.  Secukinumab in plaque psoriasis--results of two phase 3 trials.

Authors:  Richard G Langley; Boni E Elewski; Mark Lebwohl; Kristian Reich; Christopher E M Griffiths; Kim Papp; Lluís Puig; Hidemi Nakagawa; Lynda Spelman; Bárður Sigurgeirsson; Enrique Rivas; Tsen-Fang Tsai; Norman Wasel; Stephen Tyring; Thomas Salko; Isabelle Hampele; Marianne Notter; Alexander Karpov; Silvia Helou; Charis Papavassilis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  Infectious Complications of Biological and Small Molecule Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapies.

Authors:  Joshua S Davis; David Ferreira; Emma Paige; Craig Gedye; Michael Boyle
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  The Psoriasis Decision Tree.

Authors:  George Monks; Ryan Rivera-Oyola; Mark Lebwohl
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 3.  Biologics and Small Molecule Agents in Allergic and Immunologic Skin Diseases.

Authors:  Bridget P Kaufman; Andrew F Alexis
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.806

4.  Available Alternative Biologics and Disease Groups Influence Biologic Drug Survival in Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis.

Authors:  Sohee Oh; Sungjun Choi; Hyun-Sun Yoon
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 0.722

Review 5.  Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emilie Sbidian; Anna Chaimani; Ignacio Garcia-Doval; Liz Doney; Corinna Dressler; Camille Hua; Carolyn Hughes; Luigi Naldi; Sivem Afach; Laurence Le Cleach
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-23

6.  Tacrolimus Inhibits TNF-α/IL-17A-Produced pro-Inflammatory Effect on Human Keratinocytes by Regulating IκBζ.

Authors:  YingYing Hu; Jing Guo; Li Yin; Jie Tu; ZhiQiang Yin
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.092

7.  Appraisal of Candidate Instruments for Assessment of the Physical Function Domain in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.

Authors:  Ying Ying Leung; Ana-Maria Orbai; Alexis Ogdie; Pil Hojgaard; Richard Holland; Niti Goel; Jeffrey Chau; Laura C Coates; Vibeke Strand; Dafna D Gladman; Philip J Mease; Robin Christensen; William Tillett
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 5.346

8.  Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emilie Sbidian; Anna Chaimani; Ignacio Garcia-Doval; Liz Doney; Corinna Dressler; Camille Hua; Carolyn Hughes; Luigi Naldi; Sivem Afach; Laurence Le Cleach
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-19

9.  Secukinumab Exhibits Sustained and Stable Response in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Results from the SUPREME Study.

Authors:  Antonio Costanzo; Filomena Russo; Marco Galluzzo; Luca Stingeni; Roberta Scuderi; Leonardo Zichichi; Manuela Papini; Luisa Di Costanzo; Andrea Conti; Martina Burlando; Andrea Chiricozzi; Francesca Maria Gaiani; Cristina Mugheddu; Maria Letizia Musumeci; Paolo Gisondi; Stefano Piaserico; Paolo Dapavo; Marina Venturini; Gianluca Pagnanelli; Paolo Amerio; Concetta Potenza; Ketty Peris; Franca Cantoresi; Sara Trevisini; Francesco Loconsole; Annamaria Offidani; Santo Raffaele Mercuri; Viviana Lora; Francesca Prignano; Marta Bartezaghi; Giovanni Oliva; Elisabetta Aloisi; Roberto Orsenigo
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 3.875

10.  Long-term efficacy and safety of risankizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: interim analysis of the LIMMitless open-label extension trial beyond 3 years of follow-up.

Authors:  K A Papp; M G Lebwohl; L Puig; M Ohtsuki; S Beissert; J Zeng; S Rubant; R Sinvhal; Y Zhao; A M Soliman; G Alperovich; C Leonardi
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 11.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.