Literature DB >> 29439922

Increased precision of coronal plane outcomes in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ashim Mannan1, James Vun2, Christopher Lodge3, Alistair Eyre-Brook4, Simon Jones5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inaccuracy of component alignment in total knee arthroplasty adversely impacts outcomes. Robotic systems improve translation of pre-operative planning to intra-operative steps, theoretically resulting in greater accuracy and precision. In this study we systematically review literature data of alignment outcomes and apply meta-analysis methods to assess whether robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty provides superior outcomes when compared to conventional knee prostheses.
METHODS: A PRISMA compliant search comparing alignment outcomes in robotic vs conventional knee arthroplasty was performed. Primary outcome measures were; number of three degree outliers and mean deviation from a neutral post-operative mechanical axis.
RESULTS: In total, from five studies reporting upon 402 knees, a post-operative mechanical axis malalignment of >3° occurred in 1/181 (0.006%) of robotic knees, and 42/159 (26.4%) of conventional knees with a meta-analysis odds ratio of 0.04 (95% CI 0.01-0.14), p < 0.00001 favouring robotic-assisted instrumentation. Meta-analysis also demonstrated weighted mean differences of post-operative mechanical axis alignment to be significantly more accurate in the robotic knee group: mean difference -0.63 (95% CI: -1.18,-0.08), z = 2.25, p = 0.02. Sensitivity analysis with inclusion of only Level 1 studies showed similar findings.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates clear evidence of increased accuracy of alignment in robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty with specific regard to reconstituting a neutral mechanical axis and minimising number of outliers in the coronal plane. Further studies and long term data is required in order to conclude on survivorship and functional outcomes.
Copyright © 2018 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Alignment; Knee arthroplasty; Robotic knee

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29439922     DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2017.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgeon        ISSN: 1479-666X            Impact factor:   2.392


  15 in total

Review 1.  Moving beyond radiographic alignment: applying the Wald Principles in the adoption of robotic total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner; Graham S Goh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Research progress of anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Jincheng Zhang; Shuo Feng; Leshu Zhang; Hang Zhou; Xiangyang Chen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-11-15

3.  Decreased patient comorbidities and post-operative complications in technology-assisted compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryan J O'Rourke; Anthony J Milto; Brian P Kurcz; Steven L Scaife; D Gordon Allan; Youssef El Bitar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  A new robotically assisted technique can improve outcomes of total knee arthroplasty comparing to an imageless navigation system.

Authors:  Fabio Mancino; Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi; Rudy Sangaletti; Ludovico Lucenti; Flavio Terragnoli; Francesco Benazzo
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.928

5.  Robotic-assisted surgery and kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty (RASKAL study): a protocol of a national registry-nested, multicentre, 2×2 factorial randomised trial assessing clinical, intraoperative, functional, radiographic and survivorship outcomes.

Authors:  Samuel J MacDessi; Gregory C Wernecke; Durga Bastiras; Tamara Hooper; Emma Heath; Michelle Lorimer; Ian Harris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Making the transition from traditional to robotic-arm assisted TKA: What to expect? A single-surgeon comparative-analysis of the first-40 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Qais Naziri; Barry C Cusson; Moiuz Chaudhri; Neil V Shah; Akhilesh Sastry
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-03-22

7.  Report on a novel bone registration method: A rapid, accurate, and radiation-free technique for computer- and robotic-assisted orthopedic surgeries.

Authors:  Guangyu He; Vamiq M Mustahsan; Michael R Bielski; Imin Kao; Fazel A Khan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-30

8.  Computer-assisted surgery and patient-specific instrumentation improve the accuracy of tibial baseplate rotation in total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Reha N Tandogan; Nanne P Kort; Ersin Ercin; Floris van Rooij; Luca Nover; Mo Saffarini; Michael T Hirschmann; Roland Becker; David Dejour
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.114

9.  Intact, pie-crusting and repairing the posterior cruciate ligament in posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty: A 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  De-Si Ma; Liang Wen; Zhi-Wei Wang; Bo Zhang; Shi-Xiang Ren; Yuan Lin
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 1.337

10.  Improving Tibial Component Coronal Alignment During Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Use of a Double-Check Technique.

Authors:  De-Si Ma; Zhi-Wei Wang; Liang Wen; Shi-Xiang Ren; Yuan Lin; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.