Mijin Kim1, Min Ji Jeon1, Hye-Seon Oh1, Suyeon Park1, Tae Yong Kim1, Young Kee Shong1, Won Bae Kim1, Kyunggon Kim2, Won Gu Kim1, Dong Eun Song3. 1. 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea. 2. 2 Department of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea. 3. 3 Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) is an indolent thyroid tumor previously known as noninvasive subtype of encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (EFVPTC). The absence of BRAFV600E mutations has been considered characteristic of NIFTPs. However, a recent study from Korea found that 28.6% of NIFTPs harbored a BRAF mutation. This study evaluated BRAF and RAS mutations in NIFTPs and invasive subtype of EFVPTCs. METHODS: This study enrolled 32 patients with NIFTP and 48 with invasive EFVPTC. BRAF, NRAS, HRAS, and KRAS mutations were evaluated by direct sequencing using DNA from fresh-frozen tissues and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. RESULTS: The primary tumor size of NIFTP was smaller than that of invasive EFVPTC (median 2.8 cm vs. 3.2 cm; p = 0.03). Cervical lymph node metastases were found in only four (8%) patients with invasive EFVPTC. There was no BRAF mutation in NIFTPs, whereas invasive EFVPTCs had three (6%) BRAFV600E mutations and one (2%) BRAFK601E mutation. RAS mutations were detected in 15 (47%) NIFTPs and 22 (46%) invasive EFVPTCs. NRAS mutations in codon 61 were the most common mutations in NIFTPs (34%) and invasive EFVPTCs (27%). There was no significant difference in the frequency of RAS mutations between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no BRAF mutation in any of the NIFTPs. RAS mutations, particularly mutations in codon 61 of NRAS, were the most common mutations in both NIFTPs and invasive EFVPTCs. The presence of a RAS mutation is not helpful for preoperative differentiation between NIFTPs and invasive EFVPTCs.
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) is an indolent thyroid tumor previously known as noninvasive subtype of encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (EFVPTC). The absence of BRAFV600E mutations has been considered characteristic of NIFTPs. However, a recent study from Korea found that 28.6% of NIFTPs harbored a BRAF mutation. This study evaluated BRAF and RAS mutations in NIFTPs and invasive subtype of EFVPTCs. METHODS: This study enrolled 32 patients with NIFTP and 48 with invasive EFVPTC. BRAF, NRAS, HRAS, and KRAS mutations were evaluated by direct sequencing using DNA from fresh-frozen tissues and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. RESULTS: The primary tumor size of NIFTP was smaller than that of invasive EFVPTC (median 2.8 cm vs. 3.2 cm; p = 0.03). Cervical lymph node metastases were found in only four (8%) patients with invasive EFVPTC. There was no BRAF mutation in NIFTPs, whereas invasive EFVPTCs had three (6%) BRAFV600E mutations and one (2%) BRAFK601E mutation. RAS mutations were detected in 15 (47%) NIFTPs and 22 (46%) invasive EFVPTCs. NRAS mutations in codon 61 were the most common mutations in NIFTPs (34%) and invasive EFVPTCs (27%). There was no significant difference in the frequency of RAS mutations between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no BRAF mutation in any of the NIFTPs. RAS mutations, particularly mutations in codon 61 of NRAS, were the most common mutations in both NIFTPs and invasive EFVPTCs. The presence of a RAS mutation is not helpful for preoperative differentiation between NIFTPs and invasive EFVPTCs.
Authors: Rajai O Zurikat; Majd Khader; Muayad I Azzam; Zaid M Zahid; Samer F Daoud; Salam F Nusirat; Nader Albsoul; Motaz A Al-Natsheh; Mousa A Al-Abbadi Journal: Endocrine Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Melina Sabán; Norma Tolaba; Ana María Orlandi; Susana Deutsch; Fabián Pitoia; Alicia Lowenstein; María Cristina Calabrese; Andrea Cavallo; Alejandro Iotti; Marcelo Monteros Alvi; Marcelo Nallar; Ana Jaén; Silvina Figurelli; Fernando Carrizo; Antonio Colobraro; Gabriela García Tascón; María Saccoliti; Andrea Paes de Lima; Melisa Lencioni; Inés Califano; Carmen Cabezón Journal: Endocrine Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 3.925
Authors: Ja Yeong Seo; Ji Hyun Park; Ju Yeon Pyo; Yoon Jin Cha; Chan Kwon Jung; Dong Eun Song; Jeong Ja Kwak; So Yeon Park; Hee Young Na; Jang-Hee Kim; Jae Yeon Seok; Hee Sung Kim; Soon Won Hong Journal: J Pathol Transl Med Date: 2019-10-21
Authors: Hee Young Na; Mira Park; Young A Kim; Jae Kyung Won; Young Joo Park; Sun Ah Shin; Sejoon Lee; Sohee Oh; Ji Eun Kim Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Ana Carolina de Jesus Paniza; Thais Biude Mendes; Matheus Duarte Borges Viana; Débora Mota Dias Thomaz; Paula B O Chiappini; Gabriel A Colozza-Gama; Susan Chow Lindsey; Marcos Brasilino de Carvalho; Venâncio Avancini Ferreira Alves; Otavio Curioni; André Uchimura Bastos; Janete Maria Cerutti Journal: Endocr Connect Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 3.335