| Literature DB >> 29439535 |
J G S Pavan Kumar1, Ajitha Gomathi2, K M Gothandam3, Vitor Vasconcelos4,5.
Abstract
Actinobacteria is found to have a potent metabolic activity against pathogens. The present study reveals the assessment of potent antifungal secondary metabolites from actinobacteria isolated from Indian marine mangrove sediments. The samples were collected from the coastal regions of Muthupet, Andaman and the Nicobar Islands. Identification was carried out using 16S rRNA analysis and biosynthetic genes (Polyketide synthase type I/II and Non-ribosomal peptide synthase) were screened. Actinobacteria were assayed for their antifungal activity against 16 clinical Candida albicans and the compound analysis was performed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry GC-MS. The 31 actinobacterial strains were isolated and 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed that this ecosystem is rich on actinobacteria, with Streptomyces as the predominant genus. The PCR based screening of biosynthetic genes revealed the presence of PKS-I in six strains, PKS-II in four strains and NRPS in 11 strains. The isolated actinobacteria VITGAP240 and VITGAP241 (two isolates) were found to have a potential antifungal activity against all the tested C. albicans. GC-MS results revealed that the actinobacterial compounds were belonging to heterocyclic, polyketides and peptides. Overall, the strains possess a wide spectrum of antifungal properties which affords the production of significant bioactive metabolites as potential antibiotics.Entities:
Keywords: Candida albicans; actinobacteria; antifungal; non ribosomal peptide synthase; polyketide synthase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29439535 PMCID: PMC5852488 DOI: 10.3390/md16020060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1(a) Sampling of mangrove sediments; (b) Pure culture of Actinobacteria: l. VITGAP080, 2. VITGAP240, 3. VITGAP241, 4. VITGAP258; (c) Gram staining of Streptomyces albidoflavus (VITGAP241).
Isolates obtained in this study and their accession ID.
| Sequence-ID | Genbank Accession Numbers | Organism | Sampling Location | Latitude and Longitude |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VITGAP080 | KY608546 | Muthupet, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu | 10.39 N, 79.49 E | |
| VITGAP095 | KY608547 | Muthupet, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu | 10.39 N, 79.49 E | |
| VITGAP103 | KY608548 | Muthupet, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu | 10.39 N, 79.49 E | |
| VITGAP104 | KY608549 | Muthupet, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu | 10.39 N, 79.49 E | |
| VITGAP105 | KY608550 | Muthupet, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu | 10.39 N, 79.49 E | |
| VITGAP229 | KY608585 | Port Mout, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.40 N, 92.41 E | |
| VITGAP231 | KY608586 | Port Mout, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.40 N, 92.41 E | |
| VITGAP232 | KY608587 | Port Mout, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.40 N, 92.41 E | |
| VITGAP233 | KY608588 | Port Mout, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.40 N, 92.41 E | |
| VITGAP235 | KY608589 | Port Mout, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.40 N, 92.41 E | |
| VITGAP238 | KY608590 | Port Mout, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.40 N, 92.41 E | |
| VITGAP240 | KY608591 | Corbyn, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.38 N, 92.44 E | |
| VITGAP241 | KY608592 | Corbyn, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.38 N, 92.44 E | |
| VITGAP242 | KY608593 | Corbyn, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.38 N, 92.44 E | |
| VITGAP244 | KY608594 | Corbyn, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.38 N, 92.44 E | |
| VITGAP245 | KY608595 | Corbyn, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.38 N, 92.44 E | |
| VITGAP246 | KY608596 | Corbyn, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.38 N, 92.44 E | |
| VITGAP247 | KY608597 | Sippighat, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.36 N, 92.41 E | |
| VITGAP248 | KY608598 | Sippighat, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.36 N, 92.41 E | |
| VITGAP250 | KY608599 | Sippighat, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.36 N, 92.41 E | |
| VITGAP253 | KY608600 | Wandoor Jetty, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.35 N, 92.37 E | |
| VITGAP255 | KY608601 | Burmanalla, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.33 N, 92.43 E | |
| VITGAP256 | KY608602 | Burmanalla, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.33 N, 92.43 E | |
| VITGAP257 | KY608603 | Burmanalla, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.33 N, 92.43 E | |
| VITGAP258 | KY608604 | Burmanalla, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.33 N, 92.43 E | |
| VITGAP259 | KY608605 | Burmanalla, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.33 N, 92.43 E | |
| VITGAP261 | KY608606 | Burmanalla, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.33 N, 92.43 E | |
| VITGAP263 | KY608607 | Burmanalla, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.33 N, 92.43 E | |
| VITGAP270 | KY608608 | MundaPahad, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.29 N, 92.42 E | |
| VITGAP271 | KY608609 | Kalapahad, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 11.36 N, 92.40 E |
Novel actinobacterial strains obtained in this study; 16S rDNAgene sequence similarities.
| Isolate No. | Genbank Accession No. of the Isolates | Sampling Location of the Isolates | Closest Organism | Genebank No. | Similarity Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VITGAP080 | KY608546 | Muthupet, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu | KP823705 | 96% | |
| VITGAP095 | KY608547 | Muthupet, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu | KU981101 | 95% | |
| VITGAP 103 | KY608548 | Muthupet, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu | CP013142 | 95% | |
| VITGAP 105 | KY608550 | Muthupet, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu | JQ009379 | 96% | |
| VITGAP 235 | KY608589 | Port Mout, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | KX279534 | 83% | |
| VITGAP 240 | KY608591 | Corbyn, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | KU973980 | 91% | |
| VITGAP 253 | KY608600 | Wandoor Jetty, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | KU884356 | 94% | |
| VITGAP 255 | KY608601 | Burmanalla, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | EU368818 | 88% | |
| VITGAP 257 | KY608603 | Burmanalla, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | JF736620 | 97% | |
| VITGAP 258 | KY608604 | Burmanalla, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | KR817750 | 87% | |
| VITGAP 261 | KY608606 | Burmanalla, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | KX928494 | 92% | |
| VITGAP 263 | KY608607 | Burmanalla, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | NR_126175 | 94% | |
| VITGAP 271 | KY608609 | Kalapahad, Andaman and Nicobar Islands | KT588654 | 92% |
Biosynthetic potential of the actinobacterial isolates.
| Strains | PKS (Type I) | PKS (Type II) | NRPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| VITGAP080 | + | + | + |
| VITGAP095 | + | ||
| VITGAP105 | + | ||
| VITGAP240 | + | + | |
| VITGAP241 | + | + | + |
| VITGAP242 | + | + | + |
| VITGAP244 | + | ||
| VITGAP248 | + | ||
| VITGAP250 | + | ||
| VITGAP253 | + | ||
| VITGAP255 | + | ||
| VITGAP257 | + | ||
| VITGAP258 | + | + |
‘+’ indicates the presence of biosynthetic gene.
Figure 2Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of the strains.
Query coverage and percentage of identity of the sequences.
| Sequence | Query Coverage | % of Identity | No of Hits |
|---|---|---|---|
| NRPS_VITGAP241 | 99% | >83% | 15 |
| Type I PKS VITGAP-240 | 99% | >89% | 15 |
| Type I PKS VITGAP-241 | 80% | >79% | 13 |
| Type II PKS VITGAP-240 | 56% | >70% | 10 |
| Type II PKS VITGAP-241 | 68% | >67% | 6 |
Figure 3Dendrogram of NRPS (VITGAP241).
Figure 4Dendrogram of Type I PKS (VITGAP240).
Figure 5Dendrogram of Type I PKS (VITGAP241).
Figure 6Dendrogram of Type II PKS (VITGAP240).
Figure 7Dendrogram of Type II PKS (VITGAP241).
Figure 8VITGAP240 & VITGAP241 showing significant activity against: (a) Clinical isolate 1 of Candida albicans (b) Clinical isolate 2 of Candida albicans.
Antibiogram profile of the strains (R-resistant, S-sensitive).
| Antibiotics | Strains with the Biosynthetic Genes | Strains without the Biosynthetic Genes | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | 95 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 105 | 248 | 250 | 253 | 255 | 258 | 103 | 105 | 261 | 263 | |
| Piperacillin | R | R | R | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Co-Trimoxazole | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R | S | R | R | R | R |
| Ofloxacin | S | S | S | R | S | R | S | R | R | S | R | R | S | S | R |
| Amikacin | S | S | R | S | S | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | S | R |
| Erthyromicin | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Cefuroxime | S | S | R | R | R | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Tobramycin | R | S | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Ampicillin | R | S | R | R | R | S | S | R | R | R | S | R | R | R | R |
| Tetracycline | R | S | S | S | S | R | R | S | R | R | S | R | R | S | R |
| Ceftriazone | S | S | S | R | S | R | S | R | R | R | S | R | R | R | S |
| Polmycin | S | S | R | R | R | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Nitrofurantin | R | R | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Rifampicin | S | S | R | S | S | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | S | R |
| Clindamycin | R | R | R | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Netillin | S | S | S | S | S | R | S | R | R | R | S | R | S | S | R |
| Ceftrazidime | R | S | R | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Novobiocin | S | S | S | S | S | R | S | R | R | S | S | R | S | R | R |
| Aztreonam | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Cephotaxine | S | S | S | S | S | R | S | S | R | R | S | R | R | S | R |
| Chloramphenicol | R | R | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Streptomycin | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Penicillin | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Methicillin | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Jancomycin | R | R | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Gentamycin | S | S | R | S | R | R | S | R | R | R | S | R | S | S | R |
| Vancomycin | R | R | S | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
Figure 9GCMS result of Actinobacteria secondary metabolite from marine mangrove sediment.
Figure 10Heterocyclic compounds.
Figure 11Peptide compounds.
Figure 12Polyketide compounds.
Figure 13Bioactivity prediction results of isolated compounds from Actinobacteria: (a) Overall bioactivity of the compounds (b) Individual bioactivity of the compound.