| Literature DB >> 29438284 |
Nurshafira Khairudin1, Mahiran Basri2, Hamid Reza Fard Masoumi3, Shazwani Samson4, Siti Efliza Ashari5.
Abstract
Azelaic acid (AzA) and its derivatives have been known to be effective in the treatment of acne and various cutaneous hyperpigmentary disorders. The esterification of azelaic acid with lauryl alcohol (LA) to produce dilaurylazelate using immobilized lipase B from Candida antarctica (Novozym 435) is reported. Response surface methodology was selected to optimize the reaction conditions. A well-fitting quadratic polynomial regression model for the acid conversion was established with regards to several parameters, including reaction time and temperature, enzyme amount, and substrate molar ratios. The regression equation obtained by the central composite design of RSM predicted that the optimal reaction conditions included a reaction time of 360 min, 0.14 g of enzyme, a reaction temperature of 46 °C, and a molar ratio of substrates of 1:4.1. The results from the model were in good agreement with the experimental data and were within the experimental range (R² of 0.9732).The inhibition zone can be seen at dilaurylazelate ester with diameter 9.0±0.1 mm activities against Staphylococcus epidermidis S273. The normal fibroblasts cell line (3T3) was used to assess the cytotoxicity activity of AzA and AzA derivative, which is dilaurylazelate ester. The comparison of the IC50 (50% inhibition of cell viability) value for AzA and AzA derivative was demonstrated. The IC50 value for AzA was 85.28 μg/mL, whereas the IC50 value for AzA derivative was more than 100 μg/mL. The 3T3 cell was still able to survive without any sign of toxicity from the AzA derivative; thus, it was proven to be non-toxic in this MTT assay when compared with AzA.Entities:
Keywords: Novozym 435; anti-acne; azelaic acid; enzymatic reaction; response surface methodology (RSM)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29438284 PMCID: PMC6017671 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23020397
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Infrared spectrum of dilaurylazelate ester.
Variables and their levels employed in the central composite rotatable design.
| Variables | Units | Coded Level of Variables | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −2 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |||
| X1 | Enzyme amount | gram | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.35 | 0.45 |
| X2 | Reaction time | min | 90 | 180 | 270 | 360 | 450 |
| X3 | Reaction temperature | °C | 40 | 46 | 52 | 58 | 64 |
| X4 | Molar ratio of substrates | AA:LA (mole:mole) | 1:3 | 1:4.5 | 1:6 | 1:7.5 | 1:9 |
Central composite rotatable design matrix and result for the model of dilaurylazelate ester synthesis.
| Run No. | Enzyme Amount (g) | Reaction Time (min) | Reaction Temperature (°C) | Molar Ratio of Substrates, AzA:LA (mole) | Degree of Conversion % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Value | Predicted Value | |||||
| 1 | 0.15 | 180 | 58 | 1:4.5 | 87.83 | 87.82 |
| 2 | 0.15 | 360 | 58 | 1:4.5 | 93.51 | 92.40 |
| 3 | 0.25 | 270 | 52 | 1:6 | 86.61 | 86.24 |
| 4 | 0.35 | 180 | 58 | 1:7.5 | 87.89 | 87.60 |
| 5 | 0.25 | 90 | 52 | 1:6 | 80.80 | 81.19 |
| 6 | 0.35 | 180 | 46 | 1:4.5 | 80.62 | 80.59 |
| 7 | 0.35 | 360 | 58 | 1:4.5 | 95.22 | 96.21 |
| 8 | 0.25 | 270 | 52 | 1:9 | 79.69 | 79.28 |
| 9 | 0.25 | 270 | 52 | 1:6 | 87.95 | 86.24 |
| 10 | 0.35 | 360 | 46 | 1:4.5 | 95.40 | 94.88 |
| 11 | 0.35 | 360 | 46 | 1:7.5 | 90.83 | 89.84 |
| 12 | 0.25 | 450 | 52 | 1:6 | 96.74 | 96.49 |
| 13 | 0.15 | 360 | 58 | 1:7.5 | 86.73 | 87.36 |
| 14 | 0.25 | 270 | 40 | 1:6 | 85.71 | 86.60 |
| 15 | 0.35 | 360 | 58 | 1:7.5 | 90.69 | 91.16 |
| 16 | 0.25 | 270 | 52 | 1:6 | 85.27 | 86.24 |
| 17 | 0.15 | 180 | 46 | 1:7.5 | 83.91 | 82.50 |
| 18 | 0.25 | 270 | 52 | 1:3 | 85.24 | 85.79 |
| 19 | 0.35 | 180 | 46 | 1:7.5 | 78.76 | 79.12 |
| 20 | 0.25 | 270 | 52 | 1:6 | 84.38 | 86.24 |
| 21 | 0.15 | 360 | 46 | 1:4.5 | 95.38 | 95.71 |
| 22 | 0.05 | 270 | 52 | 1:6 | 93.20 | 93.04 |
| 23 | 0.15 | 180 | 58 | 1:7.5 | 84.98 | 86.35 |
| 24 | 0.25 | 270 | 52 | 1:6 | 86.61 | 86.24 |
| 25 | 0.15 | 360 | 46 | 1:7.5 | 90.13 | 90.67 |
| 26 | 0.25 | 270 | 64 | 1:6 | 92.52 | 91.77 |
| 27 | 0.35 | 180 | 58 | 1:4.5 | 89.78 | 89.07 |
| 28 | 0.15 | 180 | 46 | 1:4.5 | 84.14 | 83.96 |
| 29 | 0.25 | 270 | 52 | 1:6 | 86.61 | 86.24 |
| 30 | 0.45 | 270 | 52 | 1:6 | 93.17 | 93.47 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the quadratic model developed for synthesis of dilaurylazelate ester.
| Source | Sum of Squares | DF * | Mean Square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 688.58 | 12 | 57.38 | 51.37 | <0.0001 |
| A-Novozym 435 amount | 0.27 | 1 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.6308 |
| B-Reaction time | 351.47 | 1 | 351.47 | 314.67 | <0.0001 |
| C-Reaction temperature | 40.23 | 1 | 40.23 | 36.02 | <0.0001 |
| D-Molar ratio of substrates | 63.52 | 1 | 63.52 | 56.87 | <0.0001 |
| AB | 6.52 | 1 | 6.52 | 5.84 | 0.0272 |
| AC | 21.40 | 1 | 21.40 | 19.16 | 0.0004 |
| BC | 51.28 | 1 | 51.28 | 45.92 | <0.0001 |
| BD | 12.77 | 1 | 12.77 | 11.43 | 0.0035 |
| A2 | 84.45 | 1 | 84.45 | 75.60 | <0.0001 |
| B2 | 11.62 | 1 | 11.62 | 10.40 | 0.0050 |
| C2 | 14.91 | 1 | 14.91 | 13.35 | 0.0020 |
| D2 | 23.47 | 1 | 23.47 | 21.01 | 0.0003 |
| Residual | 18.99 | 17 | 1.12 | - | - |
| Lack of fit | 11.25 | 12 | 0.94 | 0.61 | 0.7794 |
| Pure error | 7.74 | 5 | 1.55 | - | - |
| Standard deviation | 1.06 | ||||
| PRESS | 54.47 | ||||
| R2 | 0.9732 | ||||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.9542 | ||||
| Predicted R2 | 0.9230 | ||||
| Coefficient of variation | 1.20 | ||||
| Adequate Precision | 24.973 |
* DF: Degree of Freedom.
Figure 2(a) The residual plot of runs from central composite rotatable design; (b) scatter plot of predicted conversion% value versus actual conversion% value.
Figure 3Response surface plots: (a) reaction temperature (°C) versus enzyme amount (g); (b) reaction time (min) versus enzyme amount (g); (c) reaction time (min) versus reaction temperature (°C); (d) reaction time (min) versus molar ratio of substrates (AzA:LA) (mole) on the percentage conversion as a response.
Optimum conditions derived by response surface methodology (RSM) and validation set for synthesis of dilaurylazelate ester.
| Enzyme Amount (gram) | Independent Variables | Conversion% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reaction Time (min) | Reaction Temperature (°C) | Molar Ratio of Substrates, AA:LA (mole) | Actual Value | Predicted Value | RSE (%) | ||
| Validation Set | 0.20 | 180 | 50 | 1:6 | 84.23 | 83.01 | 1.47 |
| 0.30 | 300 | 52 | 1:5 | 91.19 | 89.05 | 2.40 | |
| 0.20 | 360 | 52 | 1:6.5 | 90.99 | 89.84 | 1.28 | |
| 0.16 | 250 | 55 | 1:5.5 | 87.17 | 87.75 | 0.66 | |
| 0.10 | 360 | 52 | 1:6 | 95.10 | 93.54 | 1.66 | |
| Optimal conditions | 0.14 | 360 | 46 | 1:4.1 | 95.38 | 96.23 | 0.88 |
Figure 4Pareto graphic analysis describes the effect of each of the variables (enzyme amount, reaction time, reaction temperature and molar ratio of substrates) in percentages (%).
The size of the inhibition zone indicated the antibacterial effect of AzA and dilaurylazelate ester on bacteria Staphylococcus epidermidis S273.
| Samples | Diameter Zone Inhibition (mm)on Bacteria |
|---|---|
| Azelaic acid | 11.5 ± 0.1 mm |
| Dilauryl azelate ester | 9.0 ± 0.1 mm |
| Standard (Streptomycin) | 28.0 ± 0.1 mm |
Figure 5The inhibition zone of AzA and dilaurylazelate ester on bacteria Staphylococcus epidermidis S273, (−ve is Acetonitrile and +ve is Standard (Streptomycin)).
Figure 6Comparison the toxicity effect of azelaic acid (AzA) and AzA derivatives (dilaurylazelate ester) on normal fibroblasts cell line (3T3). Data represented in percentage (%) of cell viability (IC50).