Literature DB >> 29437889

Roles of Prefrontal Cortex and Mediodorsal Thalamus in Task Engagement and Behavioral Flexibility.

Tobias F Marton1,2,3,4, Helia Seifikar1,2,3,4, Francisco J Luongo1,2,3,4, Anthony T Lee1,2,3,4, Vikaas S Sohal5,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Behavioral tasks involving auditory cues activate inhibitory neurons within auditory cortex, leading to a reduction in the amplitude of auditory evoked response potentials (ERPs). One hypothesis is that this process, termed "task engagement," may enable context-dependent behaviors. Here we set out to determine (1) whether the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) plays a role in task engagement and (2) how task engagement relates to the context-dependent processing of auditory cues in male and female mice performing a decision-making task that can be guided by either auditory or visual cues. We found that, in addition to auditory ERP suppression, task engagement is associated with increased mPFC activity and an increase in theta band (4-7 Hz) synchronization between the mPFC and auditory cortex. Optogenetically inhibiting the mPFC eliminates the task engagement-induced auditory ERP suppression, while also preventing mice from switching between auditory and visual cue-based rules. However, mPFC inhibition, which eliminates task engagement-induced auditory ERP suppression, did not prevent mice from making decisions based on auditory cues. Furthermore, a more specific manipulation, selective disruption of mPFC outputs to the mediodorsal (MD) thalamus, is sufficient to prevent switching between auditory and visual rules but does not affect auditory ERPs. Based on these findings, we conclude that (1) the mPFC contributes to both task engagement and behavioral flexibility; (2) mPFC-MD projections are important for behavioral flexibility but not task engagement; and (3) task engagement, evidenced by the suppression of cortical responses to sensory input, is not required for sensory cue-guided decision making.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT When rodents perform choice-selection tasks based on sensory cues, neural responses to these cues are modulated compared with task-free conditions. Here we demonstrate that this phenomenon depends on the prefrontal cortex and thus represents a form of "top-down" regulation. However, we also show that this phenomenon is not critical for task performance, as rodents can make decisions based on specific sensory cues even when the task-dependent modulation of responses to those cues is abolished. Furthermore, disrupting one specific set of prefrontal outputs impairs rule switching but not the task-dependent modulation of sensory responses. These results show that the prefrontal cortex comprises multiple circuits that mediate dissociable functions related to behavioral flexibility and sensory processing.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/382569-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive flexibility; decision making; evoked response potential; mediodorsal thalamus; prefrontal cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29437889      PMCID: PMC5858597          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1728-17.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  34 in total

1.  Generating surrogate data for time series with several simultaneously measured variables.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Dissociable contributions by prefrontal D1 and D2 receptors to risk-based decision making.

Authors:  Jennifer R St Onge; Hamed Abhari; Stan B Floresco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cognitive impairment and functional outcome in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Michael F Green
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.384

4.  Thalamocortical dysconnectivity in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Neil D Woodward; Haleh Karbasforoushan; Stephan Heckers
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Inactivation of the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat impairs strategy set-shifting, but not reversal learning, using a novel, automated procedure.

Authors:  Stan B Floresco; Annie E Block; Maric T L Tse
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses.

Authors:  Jessica A Cardin; Marie Carlén; Konstantinos Meletis; Ulf Knoblich; Feng Zhang; Karl Deisseroth; Li-Huei Tsai; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Double dissociation of the effects of medial and orbital prefrontal cortical lesions on attentional and affective shifts in mice.

Authors:  Gregory B Bissonette; Gabriela J Martins; Theresa M Franz; Elizabeth S Harper; Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Elizabeth M Powell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Lesions of prefrontal cortex reduce attentional modulation of neuronal responses and synchrony in V4.

Authors:  Georgia G Gregoriou; Andrew F Rossi; Leslie G Ungerleider; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Thalamic control of sensory selection in divided attention.

Authors:  Ralf D Wimmer; L Ian Schmitt; Thomas J Davidson; Miho Nakajima; Karl Deisseroth; Michael M Halassa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Engaging in an auditory task suppresses responses in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Gonzalo H Otazu; Lung-Hao Tai; Yang Yang; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Dopamine tunes prefrontal outputs to orchestrate aversive processing.

Authors:  Caitlin M Vander Weele; Cody A Siciliano; Kay M Tye
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Increased global cognition correlates with increased thalamo-temporal connectivity in response to targeted cognitive training for recent onset schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ian S Ramsay; Brian J Roach; Susanna Fryer; Melissa Fisher; Rachel Loewy; Judith M Ford; Sophia Vinogradov; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Projection from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex to the Lateral Part of Mediodorsal Thalamus Modulates Vicarious Freezing Behavior.

Authors:  Chaowen Zheng; Yanwang Huang; Binshi Bo; Lei Wei; Zhifeng Liang; Zuoren Wang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 4.  Neural Circuits That Mediate Selective Attention: A Comparative Perspective.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Prefrontal deep projection neurons enable cognitive flexibility via persistent feedback monitoring.

Authors:  Timothy Spellman; Malka Svei; Jesse Kaminsky; Gabriela Manzano-Nieves; Conor Liston
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Selective Interruption of Auditory Interhemispheric Cross Talk Impairs Discrimination Learning of Frequency-Modulated Tone Direction But Not Gap Detection and Discrimination.

Authors:  Katja Saldeitis; Marcus Jeschke; Annika Michalek; Julia U Henschke; Wolfram Wetzel; Frank W Ohl; Eike Budinger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Cross-hemispheric gamma synchrony between prefrontal parvalbumin interneurons supports behavioral adaptation during rule shift learning.

Authors:  Kathleen K A Cho; Thomas J Davidson; Guy Bouvier; Jesse D Marshall; Mark J Schnitzer; Vikaas S Sohal
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Neural Representation of Motor Output, Context and Behavioral Adaptation in Rat Medial Prefrontal Cortex During Learned Behavior.

Authors:  Roel de Haan; Judith Lim; Sven A van der Burg; Anton W Pieneman; Vinod Nigade; Huibert D Mansvelder; Christiaan P J de Kock
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  The Virtual-Environment-Foraging Task enables rapid training and single-trial metrics of rule acquisition and reversal in head-fixed mice.

Authors:  Martha N Havenith; Peter M Zijderveld; Sabrina van Heukelum; Shaghayegh Abghari; Paul Tiesinga; Jeffrey C Glennon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  The Cognitive Thalamus as a Gateway to Mental Representations.

Authors:  Mathieu Wolff; Seralynne D Vann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.