Literature DB >> 29436916

Middle cerebral artery pressure changes following Pipeline flow diversion.

Denise Brunozzi1, Sophia F Shakur1, Fady T Charbel1, Ali Alaraj1.   

Abstract

Objective Pipeline embolization devices (PED) are commonly used for endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms but changes in intracranial hemodynamics after PED deployment are poorly understood. Here, we assess middle cerebral artery (MCA) and systemic blood pressure before and after PED treatment. Methods Records of patients with cerebral aneurysms proximal to the internal carotid artery terminus treated with PED at our institution between 2015 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if ipsilateral MCA pressure measurements were available. Ipsilateral MCA pressure was transduced via the microcatheter before and after PED deployment. Systemic arterial blood pressure was also simultaneously recorded. MCA, systemic blood pressure, and ratios of MCA to systemic blood pressure values were compared before and after treatment among the study cohort using the two-sample paired Student t test. Results Fourteen patients were included. Mean age was 54 years. Among the entire cohort, the ratio of MCA to systemic systolic and mean blood pressure were significantly higher after treatment (respectively 0.76 vs. 0.69, p = 0.01, and 0.94 vs. 0.89, p = 0.03), and the ratio of MCA to systemic diastolic pressures showed an increasing trend (1.08 vs. 1.03, p = 0.09). The percentage of ratio increase was independent of aneurysm size ( r = -0.24, p = 0.42 for systolic ratio; r = -0.09, p = 0.74 for diastolic ratio; r = -0.09; p = 0.76 for mean ratio, respectively). Conclusions Following PED deployment, the ratio of ipsilateral MCA to systemic systolic and mean blood pressure increased. These pressure changes should be further evaluated in a larger sample size.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoregulation; Pipeline; cerebral aneurysm; hemodynamics; pressure

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29436916      PMCID: PMC5967190          DOI: 10.1177/1591019918756583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  19 in total

1.  Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms.

Authors:  J P Cruz; M Chow; C O'Kelly; B Marotta; J Spears; W Montanera; D Fiorella; T Marotta
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment.

Authors:  J R Cebral; F Mut; M Raschi; E Scrivano; R Ceratto; P Lylyk; C M Putman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-Stent): do we need to rethink our concepts?

Authors:  Bernd Turowski; Stephan Macht; Zolt Kulcsár; Daniel Hänggi; Walter Stummer
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Ipsilateral cerebral hemorrhage following deployment of the Pipeline Embolization Device.

Authors:  Kyle M Fargen; Brian L Hoh
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Quantitative assessment of parent vessel and distal intracranial hemodynamics following pipeline flow diversion.

Authors:  Sophia F Shakur; Victor A Aletich; Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Ahmed E Hussein; Fady T Charbel; Ali Alaraj
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  Extra-aneurysmal flow modification following pipeline embolization device implantation: focus on regional branches, perforators, and the parent vessel.

Authors:  G Gascou; K Lobotesis; H Brunel; P Machi; C Riquelme; O Eker; A Bonafé; V Costalat
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Can the Windkessel Hypothesis Explain Delayed Intraparenchymal Haemorrhage After Flow Diversion? A Case Report and Model-Based Analysis of Possible Mechanisms.

Authors:  Alim P Mitha; Jonathan P Mynard; John A Storwick; Zaher I Shivji; John H Wong; William Morrish
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.975

Review 8.  Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Waleed Brinjikji; Mohammad H Murad; Giuseppe Lanzino; Harry J Cloft; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Cerebral hyperperfusion after flow diversion of large intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Albert Ho Yuen Chiu; Jason Wenderoth
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 5.836

10.  Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections.

Authors:  Sebastian Fischer; Zsolt Vajda; Marta Aguilar Perez; Elisabeth Schmid; Nikolai Hopf; Hansjörg Bäzner; Hans Henkes
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cerebral hemodynamics and intracranial aneurysms: Reflecting on pipeline embolization devices.

Authors:  Wesley K Lefferts; Kevin S Heffernan
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-07-22       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Impact of cerebral aneurysm size on distal intracranial hemodynamics and changes following flow diversion.

Authors:  Denise Brunozzi; Alfred See; Mark Rizko; Jason Choi; Gursant Atwal; Ali Alaraj
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 1.764

3.  Utility of quantitative magnetic resonance angiography and non-invasive optimal vessel analysis for identification of complications and long-term hemodynamic changes in post-pipeline embolization patients.

Authors:  Brendan Ryu; Timothy G White; Kevin A Shah; Justin Turpin; Thomas Link; Amir R Dehdashti; Jeffrey M Katz; Karen Black; Henry H Woo
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 1.764

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.