| Literature DB >> 29436633 |
Abstract
In order to identify the potential pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) developing from cirrhosis, a microarray‑based transcriptome profile was analyzed. The GSE63898 expression profile was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, which included data from 228 HCC tissue samples and 168 cirrhotic tissue samples. The Robust Multi‑array Average in the Affy package of R was used for raw data processing and Student's t‑test was used to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs). An enrichment analysis was then conducted using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery online tool, and the protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes and Cytoscape. Furthermore, the MCODE plug‑in of Cytoscape was used to conduct a sub‑module analysis. A total of 634 DEGs were identified between HCC and cirrhosis, of which 165 were upregulated and 469 were downregulated. According to the cut‑off criteria, the PPI network was constructed and Jun proto‑oncogene, AP‑1 transcription factor subunit (degree, 39), Fos proto‑oncogene, AP‑1 transcription factor subunit (degree, 34) and v‑myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (degree, 32) were identified as the hub nodes of the PPI network. Based on the sub‑module analysis, four specific modules were identified. In particular, module 1 was significantly enriched in the chemokine signaling pathway, and C‑X‑C motif chemokine ligand 12, C‑C motif chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) and C‑C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) were three important proteins in this module. Module 4 was significantly enriched in chemical carcinogenesis, and cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily E member 1, cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member 9 (CYP2C9) and cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily A member 6 (CYP2A6) were three important proteins in this module. In conclusion, the present study revealed that CCR7, CCL5, CYP2C9 and CYP2A6 are novel genes identified in the development of HCC; however, the actual functions of these genes require verification.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29436633 PMCID: PMC5866002 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8555
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Med Rep ISSN: 1791-2997 Impact factor: 2.952
Figure 1.Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes. Red dots represent upregulated genes and blue dots represent downregulated genes.
Figure 2.GO and KEGG enrichment analyses for up- and downregulated genes. The pink/purple columns represent upregulated genes and the blue columns represent downregulated genes. The color depth is negatively related to P-value. (A) GO analysis for upregulated genes; (B) GO analysis for downregulated genes; (C) KEGG analysis for upregulated genes; (D) KEGG analysis for downregulated genes. GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.
Figure 3.Protein-protein interaction network of differentially expressed genes. Pink nodes represent upregulated genes and blue nodes represent downregulated genes. Node size is positively related to degree.
Proteins with a degree ≥20, as determined by topological analysis of the protein-protein interaction network.
| Gene | DC | BC | CC |
|---|---|---|---|
| JUN | 39 | 17,219.9 | 0.0283 |
| FOS | 34 | 19,632.8 | 0.0283 |
| MYC | 32 | 8,693.0 | 0.0282 |
| EGR1 | 31 | 7,531.4 | 0.0282 |
| CDK1 | 27 | 6,022.2 | 0.0280 |
| CDKN1A | 26 | 4,038.7 | 0.0280 |
| CXCL12 | 25 | 3,844.4 | 0.0279 |
| CYP2E1 | 22 | 2,721.3 | 0.0278 |
| CYP1A2 | 22 | 4,144.9 | 0.0276 |
| IGF1 | 21 | 6,096.5 | 0.0280 |
| CCR7 | 21 | 2,227.9 | 0.0277 |
| CYP3A4 | 21 | 1550.2 | 0.0277 |
| PTGS2 | 20 | 6,968.9 | 0.0281 |
| THBS1 | 20 | 5,690.0 | 0.0281 |
| CCL5 | 20 | 3,738.3 | 0.0280 |
| ANXA1 | 20 | 634.9 | 0.0275 |
| SAA1 | 20 | 1,475.6 | 0.0275 |
DC, degree centrality; BC, betweenness centrality; CC, closeness centrality.
Top 5 enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes terms obtained from the subnet module analysis.
| Term | Count | P-value | Proteins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster 1 | |||
| Chemokine signaling pathway | 10 | 3.14×10−13 | CCR7, GNAI1, CXCR4, CCL21, CXCL2 … |
| Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction | 7 | 5.07×10−7 | CCR7, CXCR4, CCL21, CXCL9, CCL19 … |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | 3 | 0.007870 | CXCL6, CCL5, CXCL12. |
| NF-κB signaling pathway | 3 | 0.008048 | CCL21, CCL19, CXCL12. |
| Leukocyte transendothelial migration | 3 | 0.014455 | GNAI1, CXCR4, CXCL12. |
| Cluster 2 | |||
| Complement and coagulation cascades | 3 | 5.85×10−4 | A2M, SERPINE1, PLG. |
| p53 signaling pathway | 2 | 0.037772 | SERPINE1, IGF1. |
| Cluster 3 | |||
| Retinol metabolism | 7 | 5.57×10−13 | CYP3A4, CYP4A11, CYP2B6, UGT2B11, CYP26A1 … |
| Steroid hormone biosynthesis | 4 | 1.11×10−5 | CYP3A4, UGT2B11, CYP1A2, UGT2B7. |
| Chemical carcinogenesis | 4 | 2.94×10−5 | CYP3A4, UGT2B11, CYP1A2, UGT2B7. |
| Metabolic pathways | 7 | 3.00×10−5 | CYP3A4, CYP4A11, CYP2B6, UGT2B11, CYP26A1 … |
| Drug metabolism cytochrome P450 | 3 | 7.30×10−4 | CYP3A4, CYP2B6, CYP1A2. |
| Cluster 4 | |||
| Chemical carcinogenesis | 9 | 2.31×10−16 | GSTA2, CYP3A7, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2C18 … |
| Drug metabolism-cytochrome P450 | 6 | 8.13×10−10 | GSTA2, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2C8, CYP2A6 … |
| Metabolism of xenobiotics by | 5 | 2.30×10−7 | GSTA2, CYP2C9, EPHX1, CYP2A6, CYP2E1. |
| cytochrome P450 | |||
| Retinol metabolism | 5 | 4.91×10−7 | CYP3A7, CYP2C9, CYP2C18, CYP2C8, CYP2A6. |
| Linoleic acid metabolism | 4 | 3.70×10−6 | CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2C8, CYP2E1. |
Figure 4.Subnet module analyses for differentially expressed genes in the protein-protein interaction network. Pink nodes represents upregulated genes and blue nodes represents downregulated genes. The node size is negatively related to its degree. (A) Module 1; (B) module 2; (C) module 3; and (D) module 4.