Clare L Tolley1, Sarah P Slight2,3, Andrew K Husband4, Neil Watson5, David W Bates6,7. 1. Institute of Health and Society, Sir James Spence Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, United Kingdom. 2. School of Pharmacy, Newcastle Univesity, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom sarah.slight@newcastle.ac.uk. 3. Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA sarah.slight@newcastle.ac.uk. 4. School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. 5. Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. 6. Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. 7. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Current uses of medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) and recommendations for improving these systems are reviewed. SUMMARY: Using a systematic approach, articles published from 2007 through 2014 were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE using MeSH terms and keywords relating to the 5 basic medication-related CDS functionalities. A total of 156 full-text articles and 28 conference abstracts were reviewed across each of the 5 areas: drug-drug interaction (DDI) checks (n = 78), drug allergy checks (n = 20), drug dose support (n = 55), drug duplication checks (n = 11), and drug formulary support (n = 20). The success of medication-related CDS depends on users finding the alerts valuable and acting on the information received. Improving alert specificity and sensitivity is important for all domains. Tiering is important for improving the acceptance of DDI alerts. The ability to perform appropriate cross-sensitivity checks is key to producing appropriate drug allergy checks. Drug dosage alerts should be individualized and deliver practical recommendations. How the system is configured to identify certain drug duplications is important to prevent possible patient toxicity. Accurate knowledge databases are needed to produce relevant drug formulary alerts and encourage formulary adherence. Medication-related CDS is still relatively immature in some organizations and has substantial room for improvement. For example, decision support should consider more patient-specific factors, human factors principles should always be considered, and alert specificity must be improved in order to reduce alert fatigue. CONCLUSION: Standardization, integration of patient-specific parameters, and consideration of human factors design principles are central to realizing the potential benefits of medication-related CDS.
PURPOSE: Current uses of medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) and recommendations for improving these systems are reviewed. SUMMARY: Using a systematic approach, articles published from 2007 through 2014 were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE using MeSH terms and keywords relating to the 5 basic medication-related CDS functionalities. A total of 156 full-text articles and 28 conference abstracts were reviewed across each of the 5 areas: drug-drug interaction (DDI) checks (n = 78), drug allergy checks (n = 20), drug dose support (n = 55), drug duplication checks (n = 11), and drug formulary support (n = 20). The success of medication-related CDS depends on users finding the alerts valuable and acting on the information received. Improving alert specificity and sensitivity is important for all domains. Tiering is important for improving the acceptance of DDI alerts. The ability to perform appropriate cross-sensitivity checks is key to producing appropriate drug allergy checks. Drug dosage alerts should be individualized and deliver practical recommendations. How the system is configured to identify certain drug duplications is important to prevent possible patienttoxicity. Accurate knowledge databases are needed to produce relevant drug formulary alerts and encourage formulary adherence. Medication-related CDS is still relatively immature in some organizations and has substantial room for improvement. For example, decision support should consider more patient-specific factors, human factors principles should always be considered, and alert specificity must be improved in order to reduce alert fatigue. CONCLUSION: Standardization, integration of patient-specific parameters, and consideration of human factors design principles are central to realizing the potential benefits of medication-related CDS.
Authors: Sara Ibáñez-Garcia; Carmen Rodriguez-Gonzalez; Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana; Maria Luisa Martin-Barbero; Belén Marzal-Alfaro; Jose Luis De la Rosa-Triviño; Irene Iglesias-Peinado; Ana Herranz-Alonso; Maria Sanjurjo Saez Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Charlotte Quintens; Willy E Peetermans; Lorenz Van der Linden; Peter Declercq; Bart Van den Bosch; Isabel Spriet Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 3.298
Authors: Reith R Sarkar; J Kellog Parsons; Alex K Bryant; Stephen T Ryan; Andrew K Kader; Rana R McKay; Anthony V D'Amico; Paul L Nguyen; Benjamin J Hulley; John P Einck; Arno J Mundt; Christopher J Kane; James D Murphy; Brent S Rose Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Leslie G Biesecker; Robert T Dirksen; Thierry Girard; Philip M Hopkins; Sheila Riazi; Henry Rosenberg; Kathryn Stowell; James Weber Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Margie E Snyder; Omolola A Adeoye-Olatunde; Stephanie A Gernant; Julie DiIulio; Heather A Jaynes; William R Doucette; Alissa L Russ-Jara Journal: Res Social Adm Pharm Date: 2020-11-04