Literature DB >> 29435758

LapTrain: multi-modality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy-results of a randomized controlled trial.

K F Kowalewski1, C R Garrow1, T Proctor2, A A Preukschas1, M Friedrich1, P C Müller1, H G Kenngott1, L Fischer1, B P Müller-Stich1, F Nickel3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple training modalities for laparoscopy have different advantages, but little research has been conducted on the benefit of a training program that includes multiple different training methods compared to one method only. This study aimed to evaluate benefits of a combined multi-modality training program for surgical residents.
METHODS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was performed on a porcine liver as the pre-test. Randomization was stratified for experience to the multi-modality Training group (12 h of training on Virtual Reality (VR) and box trainer) or Control group (no training). The post-test consisted of a VR LC and porcine LC. Performance was rated with the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) score by blinded experts.
RESULTS: Training (n = 33) and Control (n = 31) were similar in the pre-test (GOALS: 13.7 ± 3.4 vs. 14.7 ± 2.6; p = 0.198; operation time 57.0 ± 18.1 vs. 63.4 ± 17.5 min; p = 0.191). In the post-test porcine LC, Training had improved GOALS scores (+ 2.84 ± 2.85 points, p < 0.001), while Control did not (+ 0.55 ± 2.34 points, p = 0.154). Operation time in the post-test was shorter for Training vs. Control (40.0 ± 17.0 vs. 55.0 ± 22.2 min; p = 0.012). Junior residents improved GOALS scores to the level of senior residents (pre-test: 13.7 ± 2.7 vs. 18.3 ± 2.9; p = 0.010; post-test: 15.5 ± 3.4 vs. 18.8 ± 3.8; p = 0.120) but senior residents remained faster (50.1 ± 20.6 vs. 25.0 ± 1.9 min; p < 0.001). No differences were found between groups on the post-test VR trainer.
CONCLUSIONS: Structured multi-modality training is beneficial for novices to improve basics and overcome the initial learning curve in laparoscopy as well as to decrease operation time for LCs in different stages of experience. Future studies should evaluate multi-modality training in comparison with single modalities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00011040.

Keywords:  Curriculum; Education; GOALS; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Laparoscopy; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29435758     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6110-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  39 in total

1.  How much practice is enough? Using learning curves to assess the deliberate practice of radiograph interpretation.

Authors:  Martin Pusic; Martin Pecaric; Kathy Boutis
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Assessment of individual hand performance in box trainers compared to virtual reality trainers.

Authors:  Atul K Madan; Constantine T Frantzides; Nina Shervin; Christopher L Tebbit
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Initial laparoscopic basic skills training shortens the learning curve of laparoscopic suturing and is cost-effective.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; William W Hope; James R Korndorffer; Sarah Markley; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Curriculum-based solo virtual reality training for laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying: objective assessment of the transfer of skill from virtual reality to reality.

Authors:  Yaron Munz; Alex M Almoudaris; Krishna Moorthy; Aristotelis Dosis; Alexander D Liddle; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.

Authors:  Venita Chandra; Deepika Nehra; Richard Parent; Russell Woo; Rosette Reyes; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Sanjeev Dutta
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Using objective structured assessment of technical skills to evaluate a basic skills simulation curriculum for first-year surgical residents.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Chipman; Constance C Schmitz
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.

Authors:  Diana L Diesen; Loretta Erhunmwunsee; Kyla M Bennett; Kfir Ben-David; Basil Yurcisin; Eugene P Ceppa; Philip A Omotosho; Alexander Perez; Aurora Pryor
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 8.  The Business Engineering Surgical Technologies (BEST) teaching method: incubating talents for surgical innovation.

Authors:  V de Ruijter; P Halvax; B Dallemagne; L Swanström; J Marescaux; S Perretta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (MIST VR).

Authors:  A G Gallagher; N McClure; J McGuigan; I Crothers; J Browning
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Face and construct validation of a virtual peg transfer simulator.

Authors:  Venkata S Arikatla; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Woojin Ahn; Amine Chellali; Suvranu De; G L Caroline; John Hwabejire; Marc DeMoya; Steven Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  17 in total

1.  Self-directed training with e-learning using the first-person perspective for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying: a randomised controlled trial : Learning from the surgeon's real perspective.

Authors:  Mona W Schmidt; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Sarah M Trent; Laura Benner; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The Heidelberg VR Score: development and validation of a composite score for laparoscopic virtual reality training.

Authors:  Mona W Schmidt; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Marc L Schmidt; Erica Wennberg; Carly R Garrow; Sang Paik; Laura Benner; Marlies P Schijven; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  [3 D laparoscopy versus 2 D laparoscopy : An up to date evaluation].

Authors:  A Buia; S Farkas
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  One or two trainees per workplace for laparoscopic surgery training courses: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Andreas Minassian; Jonathan David Hendrie; Laura Benner; Anas Amin Preukschas; Hannes Götz Kenngott; Lars Fischer; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Porcine Aorto-Renal Artery (PARA) model for laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration: the evolution of a training model to meet new clinical needs.

Authors:  James O Brewer; Lalin Navaratne; Stephen W Marchington; David Martínez Cecilia; Jose Quiñones Sampedro; Luis Muñoz Bellvis; Alberto Martínez Isla
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Development and validity evidence of an objective structured assessment of technical skills score for minimally invasive linear-stapled, hand-sewn intestinal anastomoses: the A-OSATS score.

Authors:  Mona W Schmidt; Caelan M Haney; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Vasile V Bintintan; Mohammed Abu Hilal; Alberto Arezzo; Marcus Bahra; Marc G Besselink; Matthias Biebl; Luigi Boni; Michele Diana; Jan H Egberts; Lars Fischer; Nader Francis; Daniel A Hashimoto; Daniel Perez; Marlies Schijven; Moritz Schmelzle; Marek Soltes; Lee Swanstrom; Thilo Welsch; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Evaluation of App-Based Serious Gaming as a Training Method in Teaching Chest Tube Insertion to Medical Students: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Patrick Haubruck; Felix Nickel; Julian Ober; Tilman Walker; Christian Bergdolt; Mirco Friedrich; Beat Peter Müller-Stich; Franziska Forchheim; Christian Fischer; Gerhard Schmidmaier; Michael C Tanner
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  A prospective study of the effect of video games on robotic surgery skills using the high-fidelity virtual reality RobotiX simulator.

Authors:  Andreas Pierre Hvolbek; Philip Mørkeberg Nilsson; Francesco Sanguedolce; Lars Lund
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2019-08-14

Review 9.  The current and possible future role of 3D modelling within oesophagogastric surgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  Henry Robb; Gemma Scrimgeour; Piers Boshier; Anna Przedlacka; Svetlana Balyasnikova; Gina Brown; Fernando Bello; Christos Kontovounisios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.453

10.  Construct Validity of a Serious Game for Laparoscopic Skills Training: Validation Study.

Authors:  Wouter IJgosse; Harry van Goor; Camiel Rosman; Jan-Maarten Luursema
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 4.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.