Literature DB >> 29435399

Rhodol Derivatives as Selective Fluorescent Probes for the Detection of HgII Ions and the Bioimaging of Hypochlorous Acid.

Ling Li1, Shu Wang1, Hongxia Lan2, Guiyi Gong2, Yifan Zhu1, Yu Chung Tse2, Keith Man-Chung Wong1.   

Abstract

Two sensors, 1 with a spirolactone group and 2 with a spirolactam group containing a phenyl isothiocyanate moiety, based on rhodol, were designed and synthesized in order to obtain materials with excellent optical properties for the detection of environmentally and biologically important Hg2+ and hypochlorous acid (HClO) ions. The crystal structure of 1 revealed two moieties, a rhodamine-like portion with a spirolactone and a fluorescein-like portion without a spirolactone. In the absence of analyte, 1 produced an optical output with a maximum absorption and emission at 475 and 570 nm, respectively, which was attributed to the fluorescein-like moiety without a spirolactone. In contrast, the rhodamine-like moiety containing a spirolactone was activated by the addition of H+ or Hg2+ ions, and 1 yielded new absorption and emission peaks at 530 and 612 nm, respectively. Further functionalization with a phenyl isothiocyanate group afforded 2, a fluorescent probe for HClO. High selectivity and sensitivity towards the hypochlorite ion were anticipated, owing to the stoichiometric and irreversible formation of a thiosemicarbazide group, which led to dramatic fluorescence responses. With good functionality at physiological pH, probe 2 was successfully used to image HClO in HeLa cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemosensor; fluorescence; hypochlorous acid; mercury; rhodol

Year:  2017        PMID: 29435399      PMCID: PMC5792738          DOI: 10.1002/open.201700154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ChemistryOpen        ISSN: 2191-1363            Impact factor:   2.911


Introduction

All living systems use metal cations, inorganic anions, and small‐molecule gases for biological functions. These chemical species all interact with biological macromolecules, thus driving a multitude of structural and catalytic processes. The numerous applications of this research area include signal detection for a variety of metal ions and inorganic species that trigger pathology and drive physiological processes. The divalent mercury cation, HgII, one of the most dangerous and widespread global pollutants, has high affinity for the thiol groups in proteins, and this interaction leads to cell malfunction and consequently causes many health problems in the brain, kidney, and central nervous system. HgII accumulation in the body results in a wide variety of diseases, such as prenatal brain damage, severe cognitive and motion disorders, and Minamata disease. Therefore, developing a convenient and rapid method for the determination of mercury in biological and environmental samples is urgently needed.1 Owing to the simplicity and high sensitivity of fluorescence detection, fluorescent probes are regarded as the most powerful tools for biologically monitoring metal ions in vitro and/or in vivo.2 Utilization of rhodamine derivatives as fluorescent chemosensors for mercury ions have been extensively studied in the past decade.3 Similarly to mercury, hypochlorous acid (HClO), a reactive oxygen species (ROS), plays an essential role in immune defense against microorganisms and inflammation. However, excessive HClO formation can lead to severe diseases including cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and cardiovascular diseases.4, 5 Therefore, the detection of HClO in living cells has become a popular area in biological and chemical research. Several methods, including electroanalysis,6 potentiometry,7 spectrophotometry,8 chemiluminescence,9 and fluorescence10, 11 methods, have been reported for the analysis of HClO. Among these techniques, small‐molecular fluorescent probes are attractive, because they create less cell damage and respond in a selective manner to specific analytes.10, 11, 12 This important research motivated us to construct sensitive probes for detecting Hg2+ and HClO. This detection ability would have the potential to greatly improve biochemical techniques that detect these analytes in live cells and tissues.13 Among the fluorescent probes, an interesting class of rhodamine‐based probes with two spirocyclic rings for detecting Hg2+ has been reported by us.14 On the other hand, another fluorescent dye, rhodol, possessing the merits of its structural parent units, rhodamine and fluorescein, as well as being rather less pH dependent, has received considerable attention.15 As an extension of our group's previous work on novel rhodamine derivatives16 and their combination with transition‐metal complexes,17 we herein report the synthesis as well as the photophysical and chemical properties of rhodol derivative 1 that contains only one spirolactone group. The results suggested that probe 1 exhibits an impressively high selectivity towards Hg2+ over other metal ions. In addition, a HClO‐selective fluorescent probe 2 was prepared by modification with a phenyl isothiocyanate group, and it undergoes an irreversible HClO‐promoted reaction. The new probe 2 exhibited good sensitivity and selectivity for HClO over other ROS and/or reactive nitrogen species (RNS) in phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) buffer. Moreover, probe 2 can be used for bioimaging endogenous HClO within HeLa cells.

Experimental Section

Materials and Reagents

Hydrazine hydrate (98 %), benzaldehyde (98 %), and methanesulfonic acid (99 %) were purchased from Energy Chemical. 3‐(Diethylamino)phenol (97 %, Sigma–Aldrich Chemical Co.), phthalic anhydride (Tianjin Fuchen Chemical Reagents Factory), 2‐methylresorcinol (98 %, J&K Scientific Ltd.), isothiocyanato benzene (Adamas), sodium hypochlorite (Tianjin Fuyu Chemical Reagents Factory), and other materials for the synthesis were used without further purification. All chemicals used for the synthesis were of analytical grade. Methanol for analysis was of spectroscopy grade. Copper(II) perchlorate, sodium(I) perchlorate, lead(II) perchlorate trihydrate, cadmium(II) perchlorate hexahydrate, lithium(I) perchlorate, magnesium(II) perchlorate, cobalt(II) perchlorate, and iron(II) perchlorate hydrate were of reagent grade (RG) and were purchased from Alfa Aesar. Zinc(II) perchlorate hexahydrate (RG, Aladdin Chemical Co., Ltd.), barium(II) perchlorate (RG, Sigma–Aldrich Chemical Co.), and silver(I) perchlorate (analytical grade (AR), Energy Chemical) were obtained from the indicated vendors, and nickel(II) perchlorate hexahydrate and mercury(II) perchlorate trihydrate with purities above 99.0 % were purchased from Strem Chemicals, Inc.

Instrumentation

Absorption spectra were recorded with a Cary 60 UV/Vis absorption spectrophotometer. Fluorescence spectra were recorded with an FLS 980 fluorescence spectrometer from Edinburgh Instrument TM at room temperature. Quartz cuvettes (path length=1 cm) were used for all spectrophotometric and fluorometric measurements. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded with a Bruker AVANCE 400 spectrometer (400 MHz for 1H NMR and 101 MHz for 13C NMR). Fourier transform NMR spectrometry was used to determine chemical shifts relative to chloroform or methanol. Low‐resolution and high‐resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) data were obtained with an Orbitrap Fusion TM Tribrid TM mass spectrometer.

Synthesis

Synthesis of S1

S1 was prepared according to the reported procedures.14

Synthesis of S2

A solution of benzaldehyde (1.06 g, 10 mmol) and 2‐methylresorcinol (2.48 g, 20 mmol) in MeSO3H (50 mL) was heated at 70 °C for 24 h, and a dark solution was produced. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and poured into 400 mL of an aqueous solution of 3 m NaOAc. The resulting dark‐red solid was collected by filtration to provide the crude product. The product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel with dichloromethane/methanol (40:1, v/v), thus yielding a red–brown intermediate S2 (1.32 g, 41 %)

Characterization Data for S2

1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.62 (d, J=3.4 Hz, 3 H), 7.45–7.37 (m, 2 H), 6.91 (d, J=9.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.09 (s, 6 H,).

Synthesis of Compound 1

Concentrated sulfuric acid (6 mL) was added dropwise to a mixture of S1 (0.25 g, 0.8 mmol) and S2 (0.25 g, 0.8 mmol) at 0 °C. The resulting suspension was heated to 100 °C and maintained for 3 h. After the mixture was cooled to room temperature and poured into ice water (20 mL) with vigorous stirring, the pH of the mixture was adjusted to approximately 7. The mixture was extracted with dichloromethane (20 mL) three times. The organic layers were dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate and evaporated to yield the crude product. The product was purified and separated by silica column chromatography, with elution with dichloromethane/methanol (50:1), thus yielding the pure form of 1 (0.24 g, 51 %)

Characterization Data for 1

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.85–7.83 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.64–7.60 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.55–7.51 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.44–7.34 (m, 2 H), 7.20–7.17 (m, 2 H), 7.14–7.12 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.04–7.02 (d, J=9.8 Hz, 1 H), 6.90–6.88 (m, 1 H), 6.60–6.56 (m, 3 H), 6.40–6.37 (d, J=11.5 Hz, 2 H), 3.42–3.37 (q, J=7.1 Hz, 4 H), 2.69 (s, 3 H), 2.28 (s, 3 H), 1.22–1.18 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 6 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 185.39, 169.12, 154.45, 153.47, 153.04, 152.35, 151.70, 151.25, 150.09, 149.85, 147.08, 134.74, 132.52, 129.91, 129.67, 129.33, 128.95, 128.82, 128.07, 127.29, 126.10, 124.95, 123.84, 119.18, 117.11, 116.72, 114.52, 113.52, 109.10, 108.62, 105.52, 104.67, 98.06, 83.78, 44.66, 12.68, 8.70, 8.19. HRMS (electrospray ionization (ESI)) for C39H32NO5 [M+H]+: calcd 594.22750; found: 594.22702.

Synthesis of S3

Hydrazine (5 mL) was added to a suspension of 1 (300 mg, 0.5 mmol) in ethanol (20 mL). The resulting suspension was refluxed overnight. After the resulting suspension was cooled to room temperature, deionized water (20 mL) was added to the residue. The aqueous phase was extracted with dichloromethane (20 mL) three times. The organic phase was dried by anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was removed to yield the crude product of S3 (260 mg, 87 %). The purification and separation of the stereoisomer were achieved by silica column chromatography, with elution with dichloromethane/methanol (50:1), thus yielding the pure form of S3 as an orange solid after solvent removal.

Characterization Data for S3

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.83–7.76 (d, J=6.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.51–7.33 (m, 4 H), 7.17 (dt, J=7.9, 4.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.09–6.97 (m, 2 H), 6.83 (d, J=7.7 Hz, 1 H), 6.60–6.51 (m, 2 H), 6.47–6.39 (m, 1 H), 6.39–6.30 (m, 2 H), 3.71–3.60 (m, 2 H), 3.34–3.39 (q, J=6.7 Hz, 4 H), 2.68 (s, 3 H), 2.26 (s, 3 H), 1.19 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 6 H).

Synthesis of Compound 2

A mixture of S3 (200 mg, 0.3 mmol) and phenyl isothiocyanate (180 μL, 1.48 mmol) in dimethylformamide (DMF, 2 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 24 h under nitrogen. The solvent was removed, and the crude product was purified by silica column chromatography, with elution with hexane/ethyl acetate (1:1), thus yielding the crude product as an orange solid after solvent removal. Subsequent recrystallization of the compound by diffusion of diethyl ether vapor into a solution of the crude product in dichloromethane afforded pure 2 (99 mg, 49.5 %).

Characterization Data for 2

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.87–7.85 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.67–7.63 (t, J=7.6, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.58–7.54 (t, J=7.5, 1.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.36–7.35 (m, 2 H), 7.23–7.18 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.17–7.09 (m, J=16.1, 8.2 Hz, 3 H), 7.0–6.81 (m, J=7.4 Hz, 4 H), 6.82–6.80 (d,1 H), 6.58–6.54 (m, 3 H), 6.37–6.34 (dd, J=8.9, 2.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.25 (s, 1 H), 3.4–3.34 (q, J=7.1 Hz, 4 H), 2.66 (s, 3 H), 2.25 (s, 3 H), 1.20–1.16 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 6 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 185.21, 182.35, 166.31, 154.10, 153.97, 151.45, 149.83, 148.79, 146.21, 137.35, 134.28, 132.15, 129.66, 129.57, 129.24, 128.79, 127.93, 127.70, 126.06, 124.87, 124.79, 128.34, 127.93, 127.70, 126.06, 124.87, 124.30, 124.16, 123.97, 119.15, 117.04, 115.55, 114.45, 114.07, 109.46, 102.95, 98.54, 77.21, 66.66, 44.46, 29.70, 12.53, 8.67, 8.03. HRMS: m/z [M+H]+ calcd for C46H39N4O4S: 743.26865; found: 743.26859.

Buffers of Different pH

Different buffer solutions were prepared with 50 mm potassium hydrogen phthalate (for pH 1–5 buffers), 25 mm potassium dihydrogen phosphate (for pH 6–8 buffers), 10 mm sodium tetraborate (for pH 9–10 buffers), and 50 mm sodium bicarbonate (for pH 11–14 buffers). The pH was adjusted by addition of 0.1 m NaOH or 0.1 m HCl solutions.

Biological Imaging

HeLa cells were seeded in glass‐bottom cell culture dishes and cultured in DMEM with 10 % fetal bovine serum, 1 % penicillinstreptomycin (10 000 IU penicillin m−; 10 000 μg streptomycin m−) at 37 °C in a humidified 5 % CO2/95 % air incubator. After 16–24 h, the HeLa cells were washed and treated with or without 50 mm NaClO in DMEM medium for 1 h. Then, the cells were washed three times before incubation with or without 12.5 μm probe 2 in DMEM containing 1 % DMSO for 2 hours. After incubation, the cells were washed with PBS buffer and then subjected to fluorescence confocal microscopy imaging (Leica SP8, Germany). The 16‐bit images were collected, and the normalized fluorescence intensity (threshold valve, 8000) was analyzed by using ImageJ software.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis and Characterization

The synthetic route for probe 1 is outlined in Scheme 1. Aldol condensation of benzaldehyde and 2‐methylresorcinol in MeSO3H yielded compound S2. Then, product 1 was obtained by the reaction of S1 4a and S2 in concentrated sulfuric acid under reflux conditions. The structure of 1 was determined by X‐ray crystallography (Figure 1), and all of the experimental details are given in Table 1. In addition, selected bonds (Å) and angles (o) are listed in Table S1. The O1–C30 distance of 1.247 Å is shorter than the C–O distance of a phenolic hydroxyl group of approximately 1.43 Å. Moreover, the C31–C32 and C28–C29 distances were 1.344 and 1.340 Å, respectively, which are slightly shorter than the C−C bond distance in the benzene ring of approximately 1.395 Å. This result indicated that the structure of probe 1 includes a ketone group. The dihedral angle O4–C11–O3–C20 between the xanthene plane and spirolactone ring plane was 92.8°, which is close to a right angle. Therefore, similarly to the related compound named control,16 the fluorescent probe 1 for Hg2+ contains a xanthene moiety with a ketone group and a spirolactone ring on the amino side. The structural difference between control and 1 is the two methyl groups in the xanthene moiety of 1, which cause its structure to be linear. The structure of 1 was well characterized by using standard spectroscopic techniques 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS (Figures S1–S4). Probe 2 was readily prepared from probe 1 in a two‐step reaction. The reaction of probe 1 with hydrazine yielded S3, which was then converted to the designed product 2 by further reaction with phenyl isothiocyanate (Scheme 1). The structure of probe 2 was confirmed by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS (Figures S5–S7).
Scheme 1

Synthetic route for 1 and 2.

Figure 1

Perspective drawing of 1 with atomic numbering scheme. Hydrogen atoms and solvent molecules are omitted for clarity. Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 35 % probability level.

Table 1

Crystal data and structure determination data for compound 1.

Empirical formulaC39H31O5
Formula weight593.65
Temperature293(2) K
Wavelength0.71073 Å
Crystal systemmonoclinic
Space group P21/c
Unit cell dimensions a=9.6361(9) Å b=12.2079(11) Å c=26.6548(19) Å γ=90° β=101.818(4)° γ=90°
Volume3069.1(5) Å3
Z 4
Density (calculated)1.285 mg m−3
Absorption coefficient0.085 mm−1
F(000)1248
Crystal size0.278×0.231×0.059 mm3
Theta range for data collection2.958 to 24.998°.
Index ranges−11≤h≤11, −14≤k≤14, −31≤l ≤31
Reflections collected40224
Independent reflections5402 [R(int)=0.2278]
Completeness to theta=24.998°99.8 %
Refinement methodfull‐matrix least‐squares on F 2
Data/ restraints/ parameters5402/ 6/ 418
Goodness‐of‐fit on F 2 1.020
Final R indices [I>2σ(I)] R1=0.0720, wR2=0.0881
R indices (all data) R1=0.2515, wR2=0.1210
Largest diff. peak and hole0.148 and −0.172 e.Å‐3
Synthetic route for 1 and 2. Perspective drawing of 1 with atomic numbering scheme. Hydrogen atoms and solvent molecules are omitted for clarity. Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 35 % probability level. Crystal data and structure determination data for compound 1.

Fluorescence Sensor for Hg2+

The spirolactone ring of probe 1 was opened only after the addition of Hg2+ among various transition‐metal ions, and the electronic absorption and emission spectra of 1 and its corresponding opened form, 1+Hg2+, are shown in Figure 2. Such a spirolactone ring‐opening process was probably induced by the electrostatic interaction with the O atom(s) of the COO− group upon binding of Hg2+.4 As shown, the maximum absorption and emission peaks without any analyte were observed at 475 and 570 nm. After addition of Hg2+, the new absorption and emission peaks appeared at 530 and 612 nm, respectively.
Figure 2

Electronic absorption (⋅⋅⋅) and emission (–) spectra of 1 (concentration = 2×10−5  m) in the absence (green lines) and presence (red lines) of Hg2+ in MeOH.

Electronic absorption (⋅⋅⋅) and emission (–) spectra of 1 (concentration = 2×10−5  m) in the absence (green lines) and presence (red lines) of Hg2+ in MeOH.

Selective Hg2+ Sensing

Considering the spectral changes owing to the presence of Hg2+, the potential use of 1 as a molecular probe was explored. The spectrophotometric response of 1 (10 μm) in methanol solutions of various metal ions and later to the addition of Hg2+ are shown in Figure 3. Two‐fold additions of the tested metal ions did not cause an apparent absorbance increase by 1 at 530 nm. Two‐fold additions of Cu2+ and Fe2+ resulted in a slight increase in the absorbance of 1 at 530 nm. However, Cu2+ and Fe2+ resulted in an absorbance enhancement that was far below that of a two‐fold addition of Hg2+ under the same conditions. After addition of Hg2+ (2 equiv) to a solution of 1 containing interfering metal ions (2 equiv), significant absorbance at 530 nm was observed. All of these observations indicated that 1 exhibits highly preferential binding to Hg2+ over other metal ions. The corresponding color changes of 1 (10 μm) in the presence of different metal ions are illustrated in Figure 4. Among the metal ions investigated, mercury(II) induced a marked purple–red color change of 1, whereas Cu2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, Ni2+, Co2+, Cd2+, Ba2+, Mg2+, Li+, Fe2+ and Ag+ did not induce a color change of 1. The prominent color change after the addition of Hg2+ to compound 1 allowed Hg2+ to be recognized by the naked eye.
Figure 3

Selectivity study of 1 (conc.=10−5  m) in MeOH upon addition of various metal ions (2 equiv) and interference of 1 (concentration = 10−5  m) in MeOH upon addition of Hg2+ and various metal ions.

Figure 4

Photograph of 1 (10−5  m in MeOH) showing the color change (upper) and emission enhancement at 365 nm (UV lamp) (down) in the presence of various metal ions (2 equiv). From left to right: blank, Cu2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, Na+, Ni2+, Co2+, Cd2+, Ba2+, Mg2+, Li+, Fe2+, Ag+, Hg2+.

Selectivity study of 1 (conc.=10−5  m) in MeOH upon addition of various metal ions (2 equiv) and interference of 1 (concentration = 10−5  m) in MeOH upon addition of Hg2+ and various metal ions. Photograph of 1 (10−5  m in MeOH) showing the color change (upper) and emission enhancement at 365 nm (UV lamp) (down) in the presence of various metal ions (2 equiv). From left to right: blank, Cu2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, Na+, Ni2+, Co2+, Cd2+, Ba2+, Mg2+, Li+, Fe2+, Ag+, Hg2+.

Spectroscopic Titrations with Hg2+

The absorption spectra of 1 after titration with Hg2+ are shown in Figure 5 a. The yellow–green color of probe 1 in methanol was attributed to the moiety that resembles the opened spirolactone ring form of fluorescein, which consists of a benzene ring and a xanthene moiety with a ketone group. The addition of Hg2+ resulted in the emergence of a new absorption peak at 530 nm with shoulders at approximately 495 and 575 nm that increased gradually with the increase in Hg2+ concentration, thus indicating the formation of a delocalized xanthene moiety of 1 via ring opening of the spirolactam. Such growth of the absorption bands reached saturation at approximately 3 equivalents of Hg2+ addition. Moreover, the solution exhibited a marked and characteristic color change from yellow–green to purple–red, thus indicating that 1 serves as a “naked‐eye” indicator of Hg2+. At a total concentration of 1 and Hg2+ of 5×10−5  m, a Job plot was created from the absorbance at 575 nm, which exhibited maximum absorbance when the molecular fraction of 1 was 50 %, suggesting a 1:1 binding stoichiometry between probe 1 and Hg2+ (Figure S8).
Figure 5

Electronic absorption (top) and emission (bottom) spectra of 1 (concentration = 2×10−5  m) in MeOH solution in the presence of various concentrations of Hg2+ (0–3 equiv). Ex.=470 nm.

Electronic absorption (top) and emission (bottom) spectra of 1 (concentration = 2×10−5  m) in MeOH solution in the presence of various concentrations of Hg2+ (0–3 equiv). Ex.=470 nm. The fluorescence changes of probe 1 after the addition of Hg2+ were observed in a fluorescence titration experiment (Figure 5 b). The solution of 1 showed weak fluorescence in the absence of analyte, owing to the fluorescein‐like form. After addition of Hg(ClO4)2 to the methanol solution of 1, a new emission band centered at 612 nm (with excitation at 470 nm) emerged. This absorbance at a longer wavelength dominated over the background signals caused by biological autofluorescence and other macromolecular compounds. The logK s values for Hg2+ binding were 6.18 and 6.09, on the basis of the absorption and emission titration data, and the corresponding detection limits were calculated to be 8.6 and 7.6×10−6  m on the basis of the absorption and emission titration results, respectively (Figure S9). After addition of H+, probe 1 exhibited similar electronic absorption and emission spectral changes to those observed for Hg2+ addition (Figure S10), because of the formation of an extended π conjugation. Probe 1 was studied in MeOH–buffer solutions (1:1, v/v) with different pH values (pH 1.02–8) by using UV/Vis absorption spectroscopy (Figure S11), and the corresponding pK a of 1 for the amino group was determined to be 3.1, a value similar to that of rhodamine.18 The emission spectra of 1 in MeOH–buffer solutions of different pH values are also depicted in Figure S12. At basic–neutral pH, the maximum absorption and emission peaks of probe 1 were still located at 475 and 570 nm. In contrast, at acidic pH, probe 1 had maximal absorption at approximately 575 nm and maximal emission at approximately 612 nm, thus indicating its potential for use as a pH sensor. The rhodamine derivatives with a phenylthiourea group are well documented to function as a Hg2+ chemodosimeter,14 and it is anticipated that compound 2 possesses a similar sensing behavior. Corresponding electronic absorption and fluorescence titration studies of 2 with Hg2+ have been performed. Upon addition of Hg2+ into the solution of 2, the electronic absorption spectra showed a new vibronic absorption bands at 500, 538, and 583 nm, whereas an emission band at 620 nm was observed in the emission spectra (Figure S13). Corresponding limits of detections were determined as 5.6 and 5.5×10−6  m from the absorption and emission spectral changes, respectively.

Fluorescence Sensor for HClO

Selective HClO Sensing

To test the selectivity for HClO, the emission spectra of probe 2 in PBS buffer (pH 7.45, containing 5 % MeOH as a cosolvent) after separate addition of various ROS/RNS, including H2O2, NO2 −, ONOO−, OH−, .OH, ClO4 −, PO4 3−, and ClO−, were measured and are shown in Figure 6. A large and distinct enhancement of fluorescence intensity was observed only after the addition of HOCl, whereas negligible changes were observed for other analytes. These observations indicated the excellent selectivity of probe 2 towards HClO over other biologically relevant species under physiological conditions. Compound 1 without a phenylthiourea group was found to show negligible responses towards ClO−.
Figure 6

Fluorescence intensities at 625 nm when probe 2 (25 μm) was treated with NaClO (10 μm), H2O2 (200 μm), .OH (100 μm Fe2+ + 1 mm H2O2), ONOO− (1 mm KNO2 + 1 mm H2O2). OH− (10 μm), HCO3 − (10 μm), ClO4 − (20 μm), NO2 − (20 μm), and PO4 3− (20 μm) in a PBS buffer (20 mm, pH 7.45, containing 5 % MeOH as co‐solvent) with excitation at 595 nm.

Fluorescence intensities at 625 nm when probe 2 (25 μm) was treated with NaClO (10 μm), H2O2 (200 μm), .OH (100 μm Fe2+ + 1 mm H2O2), ONOO− (1 mm KNO2 + 1 mm H2O2). OH− (10 μm), HCO3 − (10 μm), ClO4 − (20 μm), NO2 − (20 μm), and PO4 3− (20 μm) in a PBS buffer (20 mm, pH 7.45, containing 5 % MeOH as co‐solvent) with excitation at 595 nm.

Spectroscopic Studies of 2

The changes in the absorption (Figure 7 a) and fluorescence emission (Figure 7 b) spectra of probe 2 in the absence and presence of HOCl in MeOHPBS buffer solution (20 mm) (1:1, v/v pH 7.47) are shown. Probe 2 displayed absorption and weak emission bands at 475 and 570 nm, respectively, thus indicating that probe 2, which is a further‐functionalized probe 1, also contains a fluorescein‐like moiety. However, the addition of NaClO triggered a gradual decrease in the absorbance of the fluorescein‐like group at 475 nm and the emergence and gradual increase in intensity of a new absorption band at 575 nm, thus suggesting that HClO induced the formation of 1,3,4‐oxadiazole, as shown in Scheme 2. The results of emission titration studies showed an emergence of a new emission band at 612 nm over the former emission band at 570 nm. Moreover, the emission color of probe 2 dramatically changed from orange to purple–red after addition of NaClO. The corresponding detection limits were calculated to be 9.66 and 14×10−5  m on the basis of the absorption and emission titration results, respectively (Figure S14). The MS spectra indicated that HClO reacts with probe 2 and forms a ring‐opened rhodamine 1,3,4‐oxadiazole (Figure S15), thus further supporting the fluorescence turn‐on response. In addition, probe 2 was evaluated for its ability to detect HClO under near physiological conditions (20 mm PBS containing 5 % MeOH as a co‐solvent, pH 7.47) (Figure S16). The results indicated that the fluorescence sensor could be successfully applied in bioimaging.
Figure 7

Electronic absorption (top) and emission (bottom) spectral changes (excitation = 487 nm) of 2 (concentration = 2.5×10−5  m) in MeOH/PBS buffer solution (20 mm) (1:1, v/v pH 7.47) in the presence of various concentrations of ClO−.

Scheme 2

HClO detection mechanism of 2.

Electronic absorption (top) and emission (bottom) spectral changes (excitation = 487 nm) of 2 (concentration = 2.5×10−5  m) in MeOH/PBS buffer solution (20 mm) (1:1, v/v pH 7.47) in the presence of various concentrations of ClO−. HClO detection mechanism of 2.

Effect of pH

The effects of pH, a significant factor in the photophysical properties of a sensing probe, on the fluorescence response to HClO/ClO− of probe 2 in the range of 4–10 were also studied, as shown in Figure S17. As expected, negligible fluorescence changes of 2 were observed at 612 nm with excitation at 595 nm during the pH variations. After the addition of NaClO, the fluorescence intensity of 2 in the presence of NaClO became significantly higher at pH 4–6. These results demonstrated that probe 2 exhibits high sensitivity towards HClO rather than the hypochlorite ion (ClO−), because the pK a of HClO is 7.6.19 Additionally, probe 2 can be used to detect HClO in living cells without interference from pH effects.

Exogenous Hypochlorite Ion Activates Probe 2 to Emit Fluorescence Signals in HeLa Cells

To examine whether probe 2 could function properly in biological samples, we incubated probe 2 with human cultured HeLa cells and imaged the samples by using fluorescence confocal microscopy. With excitation at 488 nm and emission at 500–750 nm as well as excitation at 552 nm and emission at 560–750 nm, autofluorescence was low in control HeLa cells (Figure 8 A–D). In contrast, fluorescent puncta and diffuse fluorescence signals were observed in the cytoplasm of 2‐treated cells (Figure 8 E–H). In addition, the fluorescence intensity in 2‐treated cells was significantly higher than in the control (Figure 8 M, N). These data indicate that probe 2 is either permeable to the cell membrane or can be taken up by cells and subsequently emit fluorescent signals in human cells. Next, we determined whether exogenous ClO− could activate probe 2 in living HeLa cells and lead to strong fluorescence emission. We treated HeLa cells with sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) before incubation with probe 2. More fluorescent puncta and a higher fluorescence signals were observed in double‐ClO−‐2‐HeLa cells than in the control (Figure 8 I–L). In addition, fluorescence signals from filament‐like structures and nuclei were observed in the sodium hypochlorite treatment (Figure 8 I–L). Compared with that of the control, the overall intensity of double‐ClO−‐2‐HeLa cells was approximately 2.5 times higher (Figure 8 M, N). Collectively, these results suggested that probe 2 can effectively detect exogenous ClO− in living human cells.
Figure 8

HeLa cells treated with probe 2 and NaClO: A–D) control, E–H) cells treated with probe 2 (12.5 μm) for 2 h at 37 °C, and I–L) cells treated with NaClO for 1 h and then incubated with probe 2 (12.5 μm) for 2 h at 37 °C. The imaging conditions are shown. Scale bar, 20 μm. (M‐N) Quantification of the normalized fluorescent intensity of probe 2 in living HeLa cells. Images were collected with excitation at 488 nm and emission at 500–750 nm (M) and with excitation at 552 nm and emission at 560–750 nm (N).

HeLa cells treated with probe 2 and NaClO: A–D) control, E–H) cells treated with probe 2 (12.5 μm) for 2 h at 37 °C, and I–L) cells treated with NaClO for 1 h and then incubated with probe 2 (12.5 μm) for 2 h at 37 °C. The imaging conditions are shown. Scale bar, 20 μm. (M‐N) Quantification of the normalized fluorescent intensity of probe 2 in living HeLa cells. Images were collected with excitation at 488 nm and emission at 500–750 nm (M) and with excitation at 552 nm and emission at 560–750 nm (N).

Dual Emission Peaks of Probe 2 in HeLa Cells

Probe 2 exhibited dual emission peaks in chemical studies, and we, therefore, investigated this chemical property in living human cells. We imaged double‐ClO−‐2‐HeLa cells by exciting probe 2 with a 488 or 552 nm laser, and then collected the emission signal in 50 nm intervals from 500 to 800 nm or 560 to 800 nm, respectively (Figure 9 A–K). The average intensity in each cell across the spectrum was analyzed. The probe 2 emission peak was located at 560–600 nm with 488 nm excitation and at 600–650 nm with 552 nm excitation. However, the emission intensity when excited at 488 nm was significantly higher than when excited at 552 nm (Figure 9 L, M). We concluded that probe 2 exhibited chemical properties in vivo that were consistent with those observed in the in vitro studies.
Figure 9

Dual emission peaks in NaClO‐2‐labeled HeLa cells. HeLa cells were treated with NaClO for 1 h and then incubated with probe 2 (12.5 μm) for 2 h at 37 °C. The fluorescence images of the HeLa cells were captured with 488 nm excitation (A–F) and 552 nm excitation (G–K) with different emission wavelengths collected as indicated. The fluorescence intensities were quantified by using ImageJ software. Scale bar, 40 μm.

Dual emission peaks in NaClO‐2‐labeled HeLa cells. HeLa cells were treated with NaClO for 1 h and then incubated with probe 2 (12.5 μm) for 2 h at 37 °C. The fluorescence images of the HeLa cells were captured with 488 nm excitation (A–F) and 552 nm excitation (G–K) with different emission wavelengths collected as indicated. The fluorescence intensities were quantified by using ImageJ software. Scale bar, 40 μm.

Conclusions

We successfully synthesized probe 1, which contains only one spirolactone group, and confirmed its structure by using X‐ray crystallography. As a novel rhodol‐based fluorescence probe, 1 showed excellent selectivity and high sensitivity towards Hg2+, and the spirolactone ring was observed to open in acid conditions because of its −NEt2 group. Probe 2 was designed and synthesized by functionalizing 1 with a phenyl isothiocyanate group and was found to exhibit good functionality at physiological pH as well as excellent selectivity for HClO. The sensing mechanism of probe 2 involves the cyclization of rhodaminethiosemicarbazide, which, in the presence of HClO, forms rhodamine–oxadiazole. Confocal microscopy images of HeLa cells incubated with probe 2 showed enhanced fluorescence intensity with HClO, thus demonstrating the potential of probe 2 in further applications in in vivo HClO detection.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supplementary Click here for additional data file.
  36 in total

1.  Molecular chlorine generated by the myeloperoxidase-hydrogen peroxide-chloride system of phagocytes produces 5-chlorocytosine in bacterial RNA.

Authors:  J P Henderson; J Byun; J W Heinecke
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-11-19       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Fluorescent and colorimetric probes for detection of thiols.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Chen; Ying Zhou; Xiaojun Peng; Juyoung Yoon
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  Ruthenium-induced allylcarbamate cleavage in living cells.

Authors:  Craig Streu; Eric Meggers
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Bichromophoric rhodamine-iridium(III) sensory system: modulation of the energy-transfer process through a selective sensing behavior.

Authors:  Chunyan Wang; Keith Man-Chung Wong
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  Convenient and efficient FRET platform featuring a rigid biphenyl spacer between rhodamine and BODIPY: transformation of 'turn-on' sensors into ratiometric ones with dual emission.

Authors:  Haibo Yu; Yi Xiao; Haiying Guo; Xuhong Qian
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 5.236

6.  A dual emission fluorescent probe enables simultaneous detection of glutathione and cysteine/homocysteine.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Yang; Qian Huang; Yaogang Zhong; Zheng Li; Hua Li; Mark Lowry; Jorge O Escobedo; Robert M Strongin
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 9.825

7.  Metal coordination in photoluminescent sensing.

Authors:  Zhipeng Liu; Weijiang He; Zijian Guo
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 54.564

8.  A fluorescent probe for the detection of myeloperoxidase activity in atherosclerosis-associated macrophages.

Authors:  Joanna Shepherd; Scott A Hilderbrand; Peter Waterman; Jay W Heinecke; Ralph Weissleder; Peter Libby
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2007-11

9.  Switching the recognition preference of rhodamine B spirolactam by replacing one atom: design of rhodamine B thiohydrazide for recognition of Hg(II) in aqueous solution.

Authors:  Hong Zheng; Zhen-Hua Qian; Lei Xu; Fang-Fang Yuan; Li-Dan Lan; Jin-Gou Xu
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 6.005

10.  Ubiquinone-rhodol (UQ-Rh) for fluorescence imaging of NAD(P)H through intracellular activation.

Authors:  Hirokazu Komatsu; Yutaka Shindo; Kotaro Oka; Jonathan P Hill; Katsuhiko Ariga
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 15.336

View more
  1 in total

1.  Virtual Issue: Chemosensors.

Authors:  Adam C Sedgwick; Tony D James
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.911

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.