Literature DB >> 29435086

Influence of multiple action-outcome associations on the transition dynamics toward an optimal choice in rats.

Noha Mohsen Zommara1, Muneyoshi Takahashi2, Johan Lauwereyns1,2.   

Abstract

When faced with familiar versus novel options, animals may exploit the acquired action-outcome associations or attempt to form new associations. Little is known about which factors determine the strategy of choice behavior in partially comprehended environments. Here we examine the influence of multiple action-outcome associations on choice behavior in the context of rewarding outcomes (food) and aversive outcomes (electric foot-shock). We used a nose-poke paradigm with rats, incorporating a dilemma between a familiar option and a novel, higher-value option. In Experiment 1, two groups of rats were trained with different outcome schedules: either a single action-outcome association ("Reward-Only") or dual action-outcome associations ("Reward-Shock"; with the added opportunity to avoid an electric foot-shock). In Experiment 2, we employed the same paradigm with two groups of rats performing the task under dual action-outcome associations, with different levels of threat (a low- or high-amplitude electric foot-shock). The choice behavior was clearly influenced by the action-outcome associations, with more efficient transition dynamics to the optimal choice with dual rather than single action-outcome associations. The level of threat did not affect the transition dynamics. Taken together, the data suggested that the strategy of choice behavior was modulated by the information complexity of the environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multiple action–outcome associations; Nose-poke paradigm; Rats; Transition dynamics

Year:  2017        PMID: 29435086      PMCID: PMC5801281          DOI: 10.1007/s11571-017-9458-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn        ISSN: 1871-4080            Impact factor:   5.082


  20 in total

Review 1.  Learning and selective attention.

Authors:  P Dayan; S Kakade; P R Montague
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Associative interference between cues and between outcomes presented together and presented apart: an integration.

Authors:  Ralph R. Miller; Martha Escobar
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2002-04-28       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 3.  Operant variability: evidence, functions, and theory.

Authors:  Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

4.  Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence.

Authors:  Adam Kepecs; Naoshige Uchida; Hatim A Zariwala; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Studies of fear as an acquirable drive fear as motivation and fear-reduction as reinforcement in the learning of new responses.

Authors:  N E MILLER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-02

6.  Preference between variable-ratio and fixed-ratio schedules: local and extended relations.

Authors:  D P Field; F Tonneau; W Ahearn; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  What's conditioned in conditioned place preference?

Authors:  Joseph P Huston; Maria A de Souza Silva; Bianca Topic; Christian P Müller
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 14.819

8.  Locating and navigation mechanism based on place-cell and grid-cell models.

Authors:  Chuankui Yan; Rubin Wang; Jingyi Qu; Guanrong Chen
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 9.  Curiosity and exploration.

Authors:  D E Berlyne
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-07-01       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Midbrain dopamine neurons signal preference for advance information about upcoming rewards.

Authors:  Ethan S Bromberg-Martin; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  1 in total

1.  Design exploration predicts designer creativity: a deep learning approach.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Liu; Chaoyun Liang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 5.082

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.