| Literature DB >> 29434735 |
Luchen Wang1, Ziyun Gao2.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and the clinical significance thereof. Forty-three patients with SAH and 23 healthy individuals were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into the cerebral vasospasm (CVS) and non-cerebral vasospasm (non-CVS) groups, or the good and poor prognosis groups. Serum levels of MMP-9 and IL-6 were detected by ELISA. Expression levels of MMP-9 and IL-6 mRNAs were detected by RT-qPCR. Expression levels of MMP-9 and IL-6 were elevated with the increase of grades as determined by the Hunt-Hess grading method. Serum levels of MMP-9 and IL-6 in the CVS and poor prognosis groups were significantly higher than those in the control group. Expression levels of MMP-9 and IL-6 in the CVS group were significantly higher than those in the non-CVS group (P<0.05). Compared with the good prognosis group, the expression levels of MMP-9 and IL-6 were significantly increased in the poor prognosis group at 1, 4, 7 and 10 days after SAH (P<0.05). Additionally, the expression level of MMP-9 was significantly positively correlated with that of IL-6 (P<0.05). Expression levels of MMP-9 and IL-6 were significantly increased in patients with SAH, and the expression level of MMP-9 was positively correlated with that of IL-6. Thus, MMP-9 and IL-6 are involved in the development of SAH.Entities:
Keywords: interleukin-6; matrix metalloproteinase-9; subarachnoid hemorrhage
Year: 2017 PMID: 29434735 PMCID: PMC5774465 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.5553
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Primer sequences.
| Gene name | Primer sequences |
|---|---|
| F: 5′- AAGGATGGTCTACTGGCAC-3′ | |
| R: 5′- TCAGAACCGACCCTACAA-3′ | |
| F: 5′- GGCCCTTGCTTTCTCTTCG-3′ | |
| R: 5′- ATAATAAAGTTTTGATTATGT-3′ | |
| F: 5′-TGGGTGTGAACCACGAGAA-3′ | |
| R: 5′-GGCATGGACTGTGGTCATGA-3′ |
F, forward; R, reverse.
Figure 1.Expression levels of MMP-9 in serum of SAH patients with different Hunt-Hess grades. ELISA results showed significant differences between the control group and patients with different Hunt-Hess grades. *P<0.05.
Figure 2.Expression levels of IL-6 in serum of SAH patients with different Hunt-Hess grades. ELISA results showed significant differences between the control group and patients with different Hunt-Hess grades. *P<0.05.
Comparison of expression levels of MMP-9 between the CVS and non-CVS groups (mean ± SD).
| Groups | N | 1 day | 4 days | 7 days | 10 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 23 | 241.16±24.33 | 241.16±24.33 | 241.16±24.33 | 241.16±24.33 |
| CVS group | 35 | 382.06±24.17[ | 437.43±61.44[ | 501.19±59.74[ | 584.38±61.85[ |
| Non-CVS group | 8 | 315.29±28.91[ | 382.37±55.03[ | 320.75±30.46[ | 253.16±22.18 |
P<0.05, compared with normal control group
P<0.05, compared with non-CVS group
P<0.05, compared with 1, 7 and 10 days.
Comparison of expression levels of IL-6 between the CVS and non-CVS groups (mean ± SD).
| Groups | N | 1 day | 4 days | 7 days | 10 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 23 | 241.16±24.33 | 241.16±24.33 | 241.16±24.33 | 241.16±24.33 |
| CVS group | 35 | 50.12±21.37[ | 65.91±19.37[ | 77.19±25.37[ | 90.43±30.48[ |
| Non-CVS group | 8 | 31.07±14.75[ | 55.19±19.34[ | 42.74±27.49[ | 3.08±9.22 |
P<0.05, compared with normal control group
P<0.05, compared with non-CVS group
P<0.05, compared with 1, 7 and 10 days.
Comparison of expression levels of MMP-9 between the poor and good prognosis groups (mean ± SD).
| Groups | N | 1 day | 4 days | 7 days | 10 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 23 | 241.16±24.33 | 241.16±24.33 | 241.16±24.33 | 241.16±24.33 |
| Good prognosis group | 35 | 336.61±20.95[ | 392.88±35.91[ | 355.73±30.92[ | 301.27±28.49[ |
| Poor prognosis group | 8 | 384.25±30.19[ | 466.92±31.06[ | 499.28±35.27[ | 582.36±41.94[ |
P<0.05, compared with normal control group
P<0.05, compared with good prognosis group
P<0.05, compared with 1, 7 and 10 days.
Comparison of expression levels of IL-6 between the poor and good prognosis groups (mean ± SD).
| Groups | N | 1 day | 4 days | 7 days | 10 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 23 | 241.16±24.33 | 241.16±24.33 | 241.16±24.33 | 241.16±24.33 |
| Good prognosis group | 26 | 28.99±13.27[ | 48.85±17.91[ | 41.33±25.02[ | 4.12±6.44[ |
| Poor prognosis group | 17 | 46.24±19.05[ | 58.99±21.17[ | 70.35±28.47[ | 88.39±31.32[ |
P<0.05, compared with normal control group
P<0.05, compared with good prognosis group
P<0.05, compared with 1, 7 and 10 days.
Figure 3.Expression of MMP-9 mRNA. ELISA results showed a significant difference between patients with different Hunt-Hess grades and normal controls. *P<0.05.
Figure 4.Expression of IL-6 mRNA. ELISA results showed a significant difference between patients with different Hunt-Hess grades and normal controls. *P<0.05.