| Literature DB >> 29434180 |
Yasuyuki Shimizu1, Hiroaki Akasaka2, Daisuke Miyawaki1,2, Naritoshi Mukumoto1, Masao Nakayama3, Tianyuan Wang1, Saki Osuga1, Sachiko Inubushi1, Ryuichi Yada1, Yasuo Ejima2, Kenji Yoshida1,2, Takeaki Ishihara1,2, Ryohei Sasaki1,2.
Abstract
In cancer research, small animal models, for example, mice, rats, or rabbits, facilitate the in-depth study of biological processes and the effects of radiation treatment that can lead to breakthrough discoveries. However, the physical quality of small animal irradiation systems has not been previously evaluated. In this study, we evaluate the quality of a small animal irradiation system using GAFCHROMIC™ film and a Tough Water Phantom. The profiles and percentage depth dose curves for several irradiation conditions were measured to evaluate the quality of the irradiation system. The symmetry ratios when the table was rotated were 1.1 (no filter), 1.0 (0.5 mm Al filter), 1.0 (1.0 mm Al filter), 1.1 (2 mm Al filter), and 1.0 (filter consisting of 0.5 mm Al combined with 0.1 mm Cu). The results of measuring the percentage depth dose curve showed that the relative doses were 17.5% (10 mm depth), 12.4% (20 mm depth), 9.5% (30 mm depth), and 7.4% (40 mm filter) with no filters inserted, 78.0% (10 mm depth), 61.1% (20 mm depth), 46.9% (30 mm depth), and 35.3% (40 mm depth) when a 1.0 mm Al filter was inserted, and 94.4% (10 mm depth), 81.7% (20 mm depth), 68.1% (30 mm depth), and 54.7% (40 mm depth) when a filter consisting of 1.0 mm Al combined with 0.2 mm Cu was inserted. These physical assessments seem to be necessary especially in vivo experiments because those increase reliability of data obtained from small animal irradiation systems.Entities:
Keywords: Animal experiment; Irradiation; Quality assurance; Radiation
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29434180 PMCID: PMC5826025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kobe J Med Sci ISSN: 0023-2513