Krishna Bommakanti1, Isabelle Feldhaus2, Girish Motwani2, Rochelle A Dicker2, Catherine Juillard3. 1. University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, San Diego, California. 2. Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Center for Global Surgical Studies, San Francisco, California. 3. Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Center for Global Surgical Studies, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: catherine.juillard@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trauma registries are an essential part of trauma quality improvement programs aimed at decreasing morbidity and mortality in high-income countries. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where the burden of injury is disproportionately high, hospitals have faced challenges in adapting trauma registry models implemented in high-income countries. We analyze the barriers to trauma registry implementation in LMICs to inform development of sustainable models in resource-constrained settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured review of published literature was performed. Relevant abstracts were identified using the PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases. The search terms included were: "implement registry," "trauma registry," "wounds and injuries," and "injury registry" combined with "Africa," "Asia," "low and middle income countries," "LMIC," and "developing countries." Articles describing challenges of trauma registry implementation were reviewed in full and details were abstracted. RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles addressed challenges of implementing trauma registries. Data quality (18), lack of resources (6), insufficient prehospital care (3), and difficulty with administrative duties and hospital organization (2) were reported as the most significant barriers to successful implementation. Solutions to the identified barriers were proposed by 15 articles. All 28 studies acknowledged that the presence of at least one local trauma registry improved injury surveillance and promoted better patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Many LMICs face unique challenges to implementation that must be overcome to create sustainable trauma databases. Understanding these barriers and taking steps to evaluate the effectiveness of proposed solutions may further improve trauma care to address the high burden in these settings.
BACKGROUND:Trauma registries are an essential part of trauma quality improvement programs aimed at decreasing morbidity and mortality in high-income countries. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where the burden of injury is disproportionately high, hospitals have faced challenges in adapting trauma registry models implemented in high-income countries. We analyze the barriers to trauma registry implementation in LMICs to inform development of sustainable models in resource-constrained settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured review of published literature was performed. Relevant abstracts were identified using the PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases. The search terms included were: "implement registry," "trauma registry," "wounds and injuries," and "injury registry" combined with "Africa," "Asia," "low and middle income countries," "LMIC," and "developing countries." Articles describing challenges of trauma registry implementation were reviewed in full and details were abstracted. RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles addressed challenges of implementing trauma registries. Data quality (18), lack of resources (6), insufficient prehospital care (3), and difficulty with administrative duties and hospital organization (2) were reported as the most significant barriers to successful implementation. Solutions to the identified barriers were proposed by 15 articles. All 28 studies acknowledged that the presence of at least one local trauma registry improved injury surveillance and promoted better patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Many LMICs face unique challenges to implementation that must be overcome to create sustainable trauma databases. Understanding these barriers and taking steps to evaluate the effectiveness of proposed solutions may further improve trauma care to address the high burden in these settings.
Authors: Laura N Purcell; Emily Nip; Jared Gallaher; Carlos Varela; Yotamu Gondwe; Anthony Charles Journal: Injury Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman; Navneet Kaur Baidwan; Brenda Beaty; Krithika Suresh; Julia M Dixon; Chandni Patel; Shaheem de Vries; Hendrick J Lategan; Elmin Steyn; Janette Verster; Steven G Schauer; Tyson E Becker; Cord Cunningham; Sean Keenan; Ernest E Moore; Lee A Wallis; Adit A Ginde; Vikhyat S Bebarta Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2022-05-21 Impact factor: 3.697
Authors: Halinder S Mangat; Xian Wu; Linda M Gerber; Hamisi K Shabani; Albert Lazaro; Andreas Leidinger; Maria M Santos; Paul H McClelland; Hanna Schenck; Pascal Joackim; Japhet G Ngerageza; Franziska Schmidt; Philip E Stieg; Roger Hartl Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 5.408
Authors: Dan Magnus; Santosh Bhatta; Julie Mytton; Elisha Joshi; Emma L Bird; Sumiksha Bhatta; Sunil Raja Manandhar; Sunil Kumar Joshi Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Elizabeth Miranda; Lotta Velin; Faustin Ntirenganya; Robert Riviello; Francoise Mukagaju; Ian Shyaka; Yves Nezerwa; Laura Pompermaier Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 1.845
Authors: Fiona E Lecky; Teri Reynolds; Olubukola Otesile; Sara Hollis; Janette Turner; Gordon Fuller; Ian Sammy; Jean Williams-Johnson; Heike Geduld; Andrea G Tenner; Simone French; Ishtar Govia; Julie Balen; Steve Goodacre; Sujan B Marahatta; Shaheem DeVries; Hendry R Sawe; Mohamed El-Shinawi; Juma Mfinanga; Andrés M Rubiano; Henda Chebbi; Sang Do Shin; Jose Maria E Ferrer; Mashyaneh Haddadi; Tsion Firew; Kathryn Taubert; Andrew Lee; Pauline Convocar; Sabariah Jamaluddin; Shahzmah Kotecha; Emad Abu Yaqeen; Katie Wells; Lee Wallis Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2020-08-31