| Literature DB >> 29433668 |
Sophie Sarrassat1, Nicolas Meda2, Hermann Badolo2, Moctar Ouedraogo3, Henri Some3, Robert Bambara4, Joanna Murray5, Pieter Remes6, Matthiew Lavoie6, Simon Cousens7, Roy Head5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Media campaigns can potentially reach a large audience at relatively low cost but, to our knowledge, no randomised controlled trials have assessed their effect on a health outcome in a low-income country. We aimed to assess the effect of a radio campaign addressing family behaviours on all-cause post-neonatal under-5 child mortality in rural Burkina Faso.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29433668 PMCID: PMC5817351 DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30004-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet Glob Health ISSN: 2214-109X Impact factor: 26.763
Figure 1Pair-matched randomisation based on geography and radio penetration rate
Target behaviours and broadcasting intensity up to the month preceding the endline survey (October, 2014)
| Four or more antenatal consultations | 6 | 63 |
| Saving during pregnancy | 6 | 63 |
| Health facility delivery | 10 | 61 |
| Breastfeeding initiation within 1 h after birth | 8 | 45 |
| First bath delayed for 24 h or more after birth in low birthweight | 1 | 11 |
| Exclusive breastfeeding in 0–5 month-old children | 12 | 102 |
| Complementary feeding in 6–11 month-old children | 5 | 31 |
| Growth monitoring in 0–23 month-old children | 4 | 28 |
| Health care-seeking for fever | 23 | 100 |
| Health care-seeking for pneumonia | 13 | 84 |
| Health care-seeking for diarrhoea | 21 | 139 |
| Oral rehydration salt or increase in fluids for diarrhoea | 21 | 139 |
| Bednet use in under-5 children and pregnant women | 6 | 144 |
| Safe disposal of child's stool | 3 | 94 |
| Household latrine ownership | 2 | 94 |
| Handwashing with soap | 11 | 90 |
Submessage for antenatal consultations.
Spots no longer broadcast from midline.
Submessage for care seeking for diarrhoea; three submessages for safe disposal of children's stool.
Figure 2Pre-intervention and post-intervention periods for mortality analysis
Figure 3Trial profile
Mothers' sociodemographic characteristics
| Age (years) | 28·9 (7·2) | 28·3 (7·1) | 28·4 (7·1) | 27·6 (6·8) | |
| 3 years or more residence duration in the village | 2339 (91%) | 2656 (93%) | 2319 (94%) | 2624 (95%) | |
| Ethnicity | |||||
| Mossi | 1077 (42%) | 1343 (47%) | 743 (30%) | 840 (31%) | |
| Gourmantche | 295 (12%) | 343 (12%) | 664 (27%) | 731 (27%) | |
| Gourounssi | 566 (22%) | 575 (20%) | 79 (3%) | 94 (3%) | |
| Peulh | 166 (7%) | 171 (6%) | 420 (17%) | 522 (19%) | |
| Gouin, Karaboro, or Turka | 6 (<1%) | 0 | 342 (14%) | 316 (12%) | |
| Marka, Dafing, or Dioula | 214 (8%) | 268 (9%) | 87 (4%) | 82 (3%) | |
| Bwaba or Bobo | 191 (8%) | 123 (4%) | 82 (3%) | 105 (4%) | |
| Other | 42 (2%) | 43 (2%) | 52 (2%) | 62 (2%) | |
| Religion | |||||
| Muslim | 1209 (47%) | 1430 (50%) | 1482 (60%) | 1743 (63%) | |
| Catholic or protestant | 1154 (45%) | 1305 (46%) | 652 (26%) | 669 (24%) | |
| Animist | 199 (8%) | 132 (5%) | 333 (14%) | 340 (12%) | |
| School attendance | 400 (16%) | 583 (20%) | 251 (10%) | 396 (14%) | |
| Household socioeconomic status | |||||
| 1 (poorest) | 362 (14%) | 378 (13%) | 463 (19%) | 487 (18%) | |
| 2 | 428 (17%) | 459 (16%) | 502 (20%) | 556 (20%) | |
| 3 | 494 (19%) | 550 (19%) | 500 (20%) | 571 (21%) | |
| 4 | 555 (22%) | 672 (24%) | 495 (20%) | 545 (20%) | |
| 5 (least poor) | 719 (28%) | 796 (28%) | 498 (20%) | 609 (22%) | |
| Radio ownership | |||||
| No radio | 524 (21%) | 597 (21%) | 325 (13%) | 483 (18%) | |
| Radio in the compound | 429 (17%) | 514 (18%) | 543 (22%) | 678 (25%) | |
| Radio in the household | 1606 (63%) | 1747 (61%) | 1589 (65%) | 1607 (58%) | |
| Married | 2488 (97%) | 2778 (98%) | 2428 (98%) | 2690 (98%) | |
| Polygamous union | 984 (40%) | 932 (34%) | 978 (40%) | 1111 (41%) | |
| Two or more under-5 children | 1005 (39%) | 1218 (43%) | 1141 (46%) | 1316 (48%) | |
| Age of the youngest child in months | 21·1 (14·8) | 18·8 (13·7) | 19·4 (13·9) | 18·5 (13·4) | |
| Distance to the nearest health facility | |||||
| <2 km | 1014 (40%) | 1045 (36%) | 454 (18%) | 497 (18%) | |
| 2–5 km | 851 (33%) | 991 (34%) | 699 (28%) | 654 (24%) | |
| >5 km | 702 (27%) | 850 (30%) | 1323 (53%) | 1633 (59%) | |
Data are mean (SD) or n (%).
At baseline: from 0% to 3·1% missing values across variables; at endline: from 0% to 3·7%.
At baseline: from 0% to 1·9% missing values across variables; at endline: from 0% to 3·4%.
Figure 4Radio listenership and campaign recognition at endline
Error bars represent 95% CI.
Effect of Development Media International's radio campaign on all-cause post-neonatal under-5 child mortality (intention-to-treat analysis)
| Control group | Intervention group | Cluster-level analysis, adjusted for pre-intervention level | Cluster-level analysis, adjusted for pre-intervention level and confounder score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| March, 2010, to February, 2012 | 93·3 (72·5–114·2) | 125·1 (104·8–145·5) | .. | .. |
| March, 2012, to December, 2012 | 88·0 (66·3–109·8) | 114·5 (95·5–133·5) | 0·99 (0·83–1·18); 0·870 | 1·00 (0·81–1·24); 0·919 |
| January, 2013, to October, 2013 | 71·4 (52·4–90·4) | 105·2 (81·9–128·4) | 1·00 (0·82–1·22); 0·991 | 0·95 (0·76–1·18); 0·640 |
| November, 2013, to October, 2014 | 58·5 (44·8–72·3) | 85·1 (67·7–102·6) | 1·06 (0·84–1·32); 0·591 | 1·04 (0·80–1·36); 0·729 |
| March, 2012, to October, 2014 | 71·8 (53·5–90·2) | 100·5 (82·0–119·0) | 1·01 (0·86–1·20); 0·842 | 1·00 (0·82–1·22); 0·999 |
p value for effect modification by time=0·353.
p value for effect modification by time=0·353.
Effect of Development Media International's radio campaign on all-cause under-5 child mortality (intention-to-treat analysis)
| Control group | Intervention group | Cluster-level analysis, adjusted for pre-intervention level | Cluster-level analysis, adjusted for pre-intervention level and confounder score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| March, 2010, to February, 2012 | 115·5 (93·6–137·4) | 150·5 (126·8–174·1) | .. | .. |
| March, 2012, to December, 2012 | 105·0 (81·8–128·3) | 137·0 (115·6–158·3) | 1·02 (0·85–1·23); 0·763 | 1·03 (0·83–1·29); 0·560 |
| January, 2013, to October, 2013 | 87·9 (66·9–108·9) | 126·5 (102·8–150·2) | 1·06 (0·92–1·21); 0·310 | 1·01 (0·87–1·18); 0·846 |
| November, 2013, to October, 2014 | 76·5 (60·1–92·8) | 105·1 (85·0–125·1) | 1·04 (0·82–1·32); 0·696 | 1·02 (0·77–1·36); 0·843 |
| March, 2012, to October, 2014 | 89·1 (68·8–109·3) | 121·6 (101·4–141·9) | 1·04 (0·88–1·22); 0·534 | 1·02 (0·84–1·24); 0·710 |
p value for effect modification by time=0·698.
p value for effect modification by time=0·698.
Absolute numbers of attendances at primary facilities by time period and by group (routine facility data)
| March, 2011, to February, 2012 | 13 129 (1·00) | 19 658 (1·00) | .. | 10 598 (1·00) | 12 155 (1·00) | .. | 68 681 (1·00) | 79 852 (1·00) | .. |
| March, 2012, to February, 2013 | 12 997 (0·99) | 20 202 (1·03) | 0·439 | 10 533 (0·99) | 12 902 (1·06) | 0·787 | 83 022 (1·21) | 111 758 (1·40) | 0·853 |
| March, 2013, to February, 2014 | 13 129 (1·00) | 20 340 (1·03) | 0·469 | 10 688 (1·01) | 12 896 (1·06) | 0·866 | 82 559 (1·20) | 103 191 (1·29) | 0·323 |
| March, 2014, to February, 2015 | 12 627 (0·96) | 19 332 (0·98) | 0·564 | 11 117 (1·05) | 13 228 (1·09) | 0·901 | 82 528 (1·20) | 102 257 (1·28) | 0·291 |
| March, 2015, to February, 2016 | 11 902 (0·91) | 19 768 (1·01) | 0·240 | 10 505 (0·99) | 13 353 (1·10) | 0·558 | 83 873 (1·22) | 103 136 (1·29) | 0·403 |
Data are n (ratio to baseline). ANC=antenatal care.
p value for the comparison of the mean ratio to baseline between groups.
Figure 5(A) New antenatal care attendances, (B) deliveries, and (C) under-5 consultations at primary facilities by month and by group (routine facility data)
Intervention effect by time period on attendances at primary facilities (routine facility data)
| First year of the intervention (March, 2012, to February, 2013) | 1·06 (1·02–1·10); 0·004 | 1·07 (1·02–1·11); 0·004 | 1·35 (1·20–1·51); <0·0001 |
| Second year of the intervention (March, 2013, to February, 2014) | 1·09 (1·01–1·18); 0·026 | 1·06 (1·02–1·11); 0·003 | 1·20 (1·06–1·37); 0·003 |
| Third year of the intervention (March, 2014, to February, 2015) | 1·08 (0·98–1·18); 0·129 | 1·09 (1·04–1·14); <0·0001 | 1·16 (1·00–1·35); 0·049 |
| Post-intervention period (March, 2015, to February, 2016) | 1·11 (0·99–1·25); 0·081 | 1·09 (1·01–1·17); 0·023 | 1·12 (0·92–1·37); 0·272 |
Data are risk ratio (95% CI); p value. ANC=antenatal care.