Literature DB >> 29432592

Ultra-low-dose coronary artery calcium scoring using novel scoring thresholds for low tube voltage protocols-a pilot study.

Christoph Gräni1, Jan Vontobel1, Dominik C Benz1, Sara Bacanovic1, Andreas A Giannopoulos1, Michael Messerli1, Marvin Grossmann1, Cathérine Gebhard1, Aju P Pazhenkottil1, Oliver Gaemperli1, Philipp A Kaufmann1, Ronny R Buechel1.   

Abstract

Aims: To determine if tube-adapted thresholds for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring by computed tomography at 80 kilovolt-peak (kVp) tube voltage and 70-kVp yield comparable results to the standard 120-kVp protocol. Methods and results: We prospectively included 103 patients who underwent standard scanning with 120-kVp tube voltage and additional scans with 80 kVp and 70 kVp. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.9 ± 5.1 kg/m2. For the lowered tube voltages, we applied novel kVp-adapted thresholds for calculation of CAC scores and compared them with standard 120-kVp scans using intraclass correlation and Bland-Altman (BA) analysis. Furthermore, risk-class (CAC score 0/1-10/11-100/101-400/>400) changes were assessed. Median CAC score from 120-kVp scans was 212 (interquartile range 25-901). Thirteen (12.6%) patients had zero CAC. Using the novel kVp-adapted thresholds, CAC scores derived from 80-kVp scans showed excellent correlation (r = 0.994, P < 0.001) with standard 120-kVp scans with BA limits of agreement of -235 (-39.5%) to 172 (28.9%). Similarly, for 70-kVp scans, correlation was excellent (r = 0.972, P < 0.001) but with broader limits of agreement of -476 (-85.0%) to 270 (48.2%). Only 2 (2.8%) reclassifications were observed for the 80-kVp scans in patients with a BMI <30 kg/m2 (n = 71), and 2 (6.1%) for the 70-kVp scans in patients with a BMI <25 kg/m2 (n = 33). Mean effective radiation dose was 0.60 ± 0.07 millisieverts (mSv), 0.19 ± 0.02 mSv, and 0.12 ± 0.01 mSv for the 120-kVp, 80-kVp, and 70-kVp scans, respectively.
Conclusion: The present study suggests that CAC scoring with reduced peak tube voltage is accurate if kVp-adapted thresholds for calculation of CAC scores are applied while offering a substantial further radiation dose reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29432592     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jey019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  8 in total

1.  Ultra-low-dose computed tomography for attenuation correction of cadmium-zinc-telluride single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Marvin Grossmann; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Fabiola A Bechtiger; Michael Messerli; Moritz Schwyzer; Dominik C Benz; Ken Kudura; Catherine Gebhard; Christoph Gräni; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ronny R Buechel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Coronary atherosclerosis in middle-aged athletes: Current insights, burning questions, and future perspectives.

Authors:  Vincent L Aengevaeren; Thijs M H Eijsvogels
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 3.  Exercise and Coronary Atherosclerosis: Observations, Explanations, Relevance, and Clinical Management.

Authors:  Vincent L Aengevaeren; Arend Mosterd; Sanjay Sharma; Niek H J Prakken; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Paul D Thompson; Birgitta K Velthuis; Thijs M H Eijsvogels
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Influence of deep learning image reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V on coronary artery calcium quantification.

Authors:  Yiran Wang; Hefeng Zhan; Jiameng Hou; Xueyan Ma; Wenjie Wu; Jie Liu; Jianbo Gao; Ying Guo; Yonggao Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-12

5.  Diagnostic Value of Fully Automated Artificial Intelligence Powered Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring from 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Claudia Morf; Thomas Sartoretti; Antonio G Gennari; Alexander Maurer; Stephan Skawran; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Elisabeth Sartoretti; Moritz Schwyzer; Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro; Catherine Gebhard; Ronny R Buechel; Philipp A Kaufmann; Martin W Huellner; Michael Messerli
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03

Review 6.  Prognostic Value of Coronary Calcium Score in Asymptomatic Individuals: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Liberatore Tramontano; Bruna Punzo; Alberto Clemente; Sara Seitun; Luca Saba; Eduardo Bossone; Erica Maffei; Carlo Cavaliere; Filippo Cademartiri
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  Best practice for the nuclear medicine technologist in CT-based attenuation correction and calcium score for nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Luca Camoni; Andrea Santos; Marieclaire Attard; Marius Ovidiu Mada; Agata Karolina Pietrzak; Sonja Rac; Sebastijan Rep; Christelle Terwinghe; Pedro Fragoso Costa
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2020-07-06

8.  Dose Reduction in Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Mono-Energetic Images from Reduced Tube Voltage Dual-Source Photon-Counting CT Data: A Dynamic Phantom Study.

Authors:  Niels R van der Werf; Margo van Gent; Ronald Booij; Daniel Bos; Aad van der Lugt; Ricardo P J Budde; Marcel J W Greuter; Marcel van Straten
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.