PURPOSE: To characterize the weekly training load (TL) and well-being of college basketball players during the in-season phase. METHODS: Ten (6 guards and 4 forwards) male basketball players (age 20.9 [0.9] y, stature 195.0 [8.2] cm, and body mass 91.3 [11.3] kg) from the same Division I National Collegiate Athletic Association team were recruited to participate in this study. Individualized training and game loads were assessed using the session rating of perceived exertion at the end of each training and game session, and well-being status was collected before each session. Weekly changes (%) in TL, acute-to-chronic workload ratio, and well-being were determined. Differences in TL and well-being between starting and bench players and between 1-game and 2-game weeks were calculated using magnitude-based statistics. RESULTS: Total weekly TL and acute-to-chronic workload ratio demonstrated high week-to-week variation, with spikes up to 226% and 220%, respectively. Starting players experienced a higher (most likely negative) total weekly TL and similar (unclear) well-being status compared with bench players. Game scheduling influenced TL, with 1-game weeks demonstrating a higher (likely negative) total weekly TL and similar (most likely trivial) well-being status compared with 2-game weeks. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide college basketball coaches information to optimize training strategies during the in-season phase. Basketball coaches should concurrently consider the number of weekly games and player status (starting vs bench player) when creating individualized periodization plans, with increases in TL potentially needed in bench players, especially in 2-game weeks.
PURPOSE: To characterize the weekly training load (TL) and well-being of college basketball players during the in-season phase. METHODS: Ten (6 guards and 4 forwards) male basketball players (age 20.9 [0.9] y, stature 195.0 [8.2] cm, and body mass 91.3 [11.3] kg) from the same Division I National Collegiate Athletic Association team were recruited to participate in this study. Individualized training and game loads were assessed using the session rating of perceived exertion at the end of each training and game session, and well-being status was collected before each session. Weekly changes (%) in TL, acute-to-chronic workload ratio, and well-being were determined. Differences in TL and well-being between starting and bench players and between 1-game and 2-game weeks were calculated using magnitude-based statistics. RESULTS: Total weekly TL and acute-to-chronic workload ratio demonstrated high week-to-week variation, with spikes up to 226% and 220%, respectively. Starting players experienced a higher (most likely negative) total weekly TL and similar (unclear) well-being status compared with bench players. Game scheduling influenced TL, with 1-game weeks demonstrating a higher (likely negative) total weekly TL and similar (most likely trivial) well-being status compared with 2-game weeks. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide college basketball coaches information to optimize training strategies during the in-season phase. Basketball coaches should concurrently consider the number of weekly games and player status (starting vs bench player) when creating individualized periodization plans, with increases in TL potentially needed in bench players, especially in 2-game weeks.
Entities:
Keywords:
RPE; acute-to-chronic workload ratio; internal load; periodization; team sports
Authors: Jennifer L Russell; Blake D McLean; Franco M Impellizzeri; Donnie S Strack; Aaron J Coutts Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: José Pino-Ortega; Daniel Rojas-Valverde; Carlos David Gómez-Carmona; Alejandro Bastida-Castillo; Alejandro Hernández-Belmonte; Javier García-Rubio; Fábio Yuzo Nakamura; Sergio José Ibáñez Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2019-05-15
Authors: Adam J Petway; Tomás T Freitas; Julio Calleja-González; Daniel Medina Leal; Pedro E Alcaraz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Enrique Alonso; Nicolas Miranda; Shaoliang Zhang; Carlos Sosa; Juan Trapero; Jorge Lorenzo; Alberto Lorenzo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Cody J O'Grady; Vincent J Dalbo; Masaru Teramoto; Jordan L Fox; Aaron T Scanlan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-22 Impact factor: 3.390