Dmitry N Dirin1,2, Ihor Cherniukh1,2, Sergii Yakunin1,2, Yevhen Shynkarenko1,2,3, Maksym V Kovalenko1,2. 1. Laboratory of Inorganic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland. 2. Laboratory for Thin Films and Photovoltaics, Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland. 3. Department of Photonic Processes, Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 46 Prospekt Nauky, Kyiv 03680, Ukraine.
Lead halide semiconductors with
perovskite crystal structure and APbX3 stoichiometry [A
= CH3NH3+ (methylammonium, MA+), CH(NH2)2+ (formamidinium,
FA+), or Cs+; X = I–, Br–, Cl– or mixtures thereof] have recently become perhaps
the most intensely studied class of inorganic optoelectronic materials.
After exhibiting unprecedented performance as solution-processed absorbers
in photovoltaics with certified power conversion efficiencies presently
exceeding 22%,[1] these materials were soon
also used in light-emitting diodes,[2] lasers,[3] ultraviolet-to-infrared photodetectors[4−7] as well as in X-ray[8−10] gamma-ray (γ-ray) detectors.[11−13] In these applications,
solution- or Bridgman-grown large single crystals (SCs),[4,8,12−18] thin-films or nanocrystalline forms of perovskites are utilized.
Such a diversity of applications is to a large extent due to the so-called
defect-tolerance[19,20] of these semiconductors: a low
density of electronic trap states despite a large density of point
defects. Several commonly reported parameters exemplify the outstanding
photophysical and electronic quality of perovskites: low densities
of carriers (109–1011 cm–3),[14,21] low densities of traps (109–1010 cm–3),[14,22] which are
lower than in monocrystalline Si,[20] high
carrier mobilities (2.5–1000 cm2 V–1 s–1),[12,14,17,20,23] long charge carrier lifetimes (0.08–450 μs),[12,14,16,17,24,25] long electron–hole
diffusion lengths (2–175 μm),[14,16,24] small carrier effective masses (0.069–0.25
m0),[26] high optical absorption
coefficients at the absorption edge (1–4.5 × 104 cm–1)[20] and high luminescence
efficiencies.[27,28]The ability to grow semiconductors
in the form of large SCs has
always been of paramount technological and scientific importance.
For instance, state-of-the-art Si solar cells are made from large
SC ingots. SCs reflect, as close as possible, the intrinsic physical
properties of a semiconductor and usually exhibit better electronic
characteristics as compared to nano- or polycrystalline forms of the
same compound. In the case of MAPbI3, for example, SCs
exhibit carrier mobilities of up to 200 cm2 V–1 s–1 (vs 0.4–40 cm2 V–1 s–1 in thin-films) and lifetimes of up to 500
μs (vs 4.5–1000 ns in films and nanocrystals).[17,20] Beyond studies of fundamental physical properties, SCs are required
for the structural determination of novel compounds and for structural
refinement of known materials.[29,30] Perovskite SCs are
notably also more chemically stable than their thin-film counterparts.[31]Recently, several solution-based approaches
to growing centimeter-scale
perovskite SCs have been developed. They can be divided into three
categories: (i) slow crystallization upon cooling saturated aqueous
hydrohalic solutions[17,32] or solutions in organic solvent,[33] (ii) crystallization due to a change of the
solvent polarity by slow antisolvent diffusion[14,34] and (iii) inverse temperature crystallization (ITC),[16,21,24,35−38] initially proposed by Bakr et al.[24,36] In the lattermost
method, crystallization is caused by the inverse solubility dependence
on temperature in some organic solvents and the overall growth occurs
relatively fast, e.g., within several hours. Centimeter-scale SCs
of all MAPbX3 and FAPbX3 compositions can be
grown by at least one of these three approaches, enabling studies
of their intrinsic electronic[8,14,39,40] and optical properties, which
have been reported within the last year.[4,15,41−43] On the contrary, the solution-based
growth of fully inorganic CsPbX3 SCs remained elusive.
Such all-inorganic analogs could perhaps overcome the known issues
of chemical instability of hybrid perovskites.[18,31,32] Although known since the 1950s, CsPbX3 perovskites have only recently received their rightful attention
in the form of thin-films and nanocrystals, demonstrating promising
potential in photovoltaics[44] and for bright
light emission.[27] Thus far, high-quality
CsPbBr3 and CsPbCl3 SCs could only be obtained
via high-temperature growth from melts using the Bridgman method (at
temperatures above 600 °C, in an evacuated quartz tube, using
highly pure starting reagents).[12,45−47]In this work, we present a simple and fast route to solution
growth
of CsPbBr3 SCs using the ITC method, under ambient atmosphere
and using low-cost precursors. Obtained SCs can be handled in air
and can be easily wet-polished using DMSO; all such treatments showed
no substantial effect on the electric properties of SCs. We also report
the sensitive detection of visible and gamma-photons as evidence of
the high electronic quality of this material. We note that during
the preparation of this paper, another report on solution-grown CsPbBr3 SCs by Rakita et al. was published,[34] wherein a greater focus was placed on the antisolvent diffusion
method or growth from antisolvent-containing solutions at rather low
temperatures. In our experiments, nucleation and growth of crystals
at temperatures higher than 88 °C, at which orthorhombic-to-tetragonal
phase transition takes place,[12] resulted
in crystals with improved crystallinity and different morphology.In previous studies on hybrid perovskites, the optimal solvents
for ITC growth were reported to be dimethylformamide (DMF), dymethylsulfoxide
(DMSO), γ-butyrolactone and their mixtures.[16,21,24,35−38] We find that the growth of CsPbBr3 is best carried out
in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Specifically, a CsBr:PbBr2 solution (1:2 molar ratio, 1 M concentration of Pb) in a mixture
of DMSO with cyclohexanol (CyOH) and DMF, was heated to 90 °C
in a vial, leading to the formation of 1–3 nuclei. Subsequent
heating to 110 °C led to further growth without additional nucleation.
A several-mm-long, flat, orange-colored and optically clear SC was
collected within several hours (Figure ). The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the
grounded SC (Figure e) is consistent with the orthorhombic modification of CsPbBr3, as previously reported.[12]
Figure 1
Temperature
dependence of the solubility for CsBr, Cs4PbBr6, CsPbBr3 and CsPb2Br5 in (a) DMSO
and (b) a DMSO/CyOH/DMF mixture. (c) Effect of PbBr2 addition
on CsBr solubility in DMSO and a DMSO/CyOH/DMF mixture.
(d) Photographs of the obtained CsPbBr3 SCs. (e) Powder
XRD patterns of the obtained SCs (brown) in comparison with the reported
crystal structure of CsPbBr3 (ICSD card #97851).
Temperature
dependence of the solubility for CsBr, Cs4PbBr6, CsPbBr3 and CsPb2Br5 in (a) DMSO
and (b) a DMSO/CyOH/DMF mixture. (c) Effect of PbBr2 addition
on CsBr solubility in DMSO and a DMSO/CyOH/DMF mixture.
(d) Photographs of the obtained CsPbBr3 SCs. (e) Powder
XRD patterns of the obtained SCs (brown) in comparison with the reported
crystal structure of CsPbBr3 (ICSD card #97851).Starting with pristine CsBr and
PbBr2, and considering
the known phase diagram of the Cs–Pb–Br system,[48] there are 3 plausible products of the above
synthetic approach: Cs4PbBr6, CsPbBr3 and CsPb2Br5. Figure a summarizes the solubility of CsBr and various
CsBr:PbBr2 mixtures in DMSO and indicates the identity
of any observed precipitation products upon saturation. The limiting
factor is the low solubility of pristine CsBr, whereas the solubility
of PbBr2 is the highest (2 M at room temperature, not indicated
in Figure a). The
addition of PbBr2 notably increases the solubility of CsBr
(Figure a,c) due to
the formation of PbBr(2– complexes, where n is 3 and above,
thus reducing the [Cs+][Br–] product.
In aqueous, DMF and other polar solutions, PbX(2– anions (X = Br, I)
with n = 3–5 have been commonly reported.[31,49] Cs4PbBr6 is observed as the single precipitation
product upon saturation of 4:1 CsBr:PbBr2 solutions. For
1:1 CsBr:PbBr2, we still find Cs4PbBr6 as a primary product (with small inclusions of CsPbBr3). Only upon an increase of the PbBr2 fraction (forming
1:2 CsBr:PbBr2 solutions) is the formation of the desired
CsPbBr3 product with lower coordination number favored.
Intermediate CsBr:PbBr2 ratios of 1:1.2 or 1:1.5 still
result in a Cs-rich precipitate. A solution with a 1:2 CsBr:PbBr2 ratio produces pure CsPbBr3 precipitate at any
temperature in the range of 25–110 °C (Figure a). As expected, the further
increase in PbBr2 concentration leads to the precipitation
of CsPb2Br5. The solubility of most compounds
in Figure a is fairly
independent of temperature. Only at a 1:2 ratio of CsBr:PbBr2 do we find a significant, ∼40% drop in the solubility between
75 and 90 °C. At these temperatures, such a behavior resembles
the rarely observed phenomenon of retrograde solubility. This phenomenal
has been generally explained by the negative enthalpy of solubilization,[50] and the corresponding temperature coefficient
of the solubility is then equal to −ΔH°/T2. Previous studies by Bakr et
al.[16,21,24,35,36] indicated the relevance
of retrograde solubility to all FAPbX3 and MAPbX3 compositions in DMF, DMSO and γ-butyrolactone, and pointed
to a complex interplay between the solvation of ions and complexation
equilibria of PbX(2–. All compounds showed a steady decrease of solubility
with increasing temperature, except for MAPbI3 where solubility
increased until 60 °C and then decreased.[36] A more complex behavior in our case, i.e. the coexistence
of the temperature-independent regions below and above the rather
narrow retrograde solubility region, calls for additional considerations.
One important factor might be an orthorhombic-to-tetragonal phase
transition, reported to occur at 88 °C in thermodynamic equilibrium.[12] The solubilities of each phase are likely to
be different, causing a transition range on a solubility-temperature
profile.Although a solubility gradient, such as the one in Figure a, in principle allows
the
growth of SCs, the particularly steep dependence for 1:2 CsBr:PbBr2 solutions in DMSO might also be problematic. Overly fast
oversaturation upon heating causes the formation of multiple nuclei
and/or polycrystals. We found that the solubility-temperature profile
can be smoothened by the addition of CyOH or a CyOH/DMF mixture (Figure b). SC growth from
such solvent mixtures led to better reproducibility of the results
and only 1–3 crystals per vessel. These crystals nucleate at
∼90 °C and continue to grow at temperatures up to 110
°C without further nucleation. The best quality SCs were obtained
at an overall growth rate of below 0.2 mm/h.Nucleation at 90
°C and above is critical for the formation
of CsPbBr3 SCs with high optical clarity. Such SCs have
rectangular, plate-like shape and behave as single crystals under
polarized light (Figure ). At growth rates higher than 0.2 mm/h, the crystals have a tendency
to grow faster in one direction (such as in prism-like shapes, ∼
3 × 0.5 × 0.5 mm) and start appearing to have large scattering
inclusions (Figure S1). Nucleation at lower
temperatures leads to granular, turbid crystals, indicating polycrystallinity.
Similar problems were encountered when trying alternative growth methods,
e.g., via cooling of hydrohalic aqueous solutions or using slow diffusion
of an ethanol:water mixture into DMSO solutions (details can be found
in SI, Methods 2 and 3, respectively; photos
exemplifying these crystals are shown in Figure S2). In these methods,
nucleation and growth occurred at 25–70 °C.
Figure 2
Photograph
of CsPbBr3 SCs in nonpolarized light and
0° and 45° polarized light. The uniform transparency of
individual crystals and the change in transparency upon changing light
polarization are shown. This indicates the single crystallographic
orientation of each entire crystal.
Photograph
of CsPbBr3 SCs in nonpolarized light and
0° and 45° polarized light. The uniform transparency of
individual crystals and the change in transparency upon changing light
polarization are shown. This indicates the single crystallographic
orientation of each entire crystal.The optical absorption spectra of CsPbBr3 SCs
is evaluated
using diffuse reflectance data, analyzed through the Kubelka–Munk
equation, and show step-like behavior at the band edge (Figure a). The spectrum can be fitted
with a direct-gap Tauc plot (inset in Figure a) yielding a bandgap energy of about 2.254
eV. A similar value of 2.25 eV was reported for Bridgman-grown CsPbBr3 SCs.[12] The transparency region
can be used to calculate the refractive index from the reflectivity
spectrum (Figure S3). A normal dispersion
of refractive index from 2.3 to 2.2 for the wavelength region of 580–800
nm was observed.
Figure 3
(a) Transformed Kubelka–Munk spectrum of CsPbBr3 SCs. The inset shows the spectrum in a Tauc plot. (b) Photoresponsivity
spectrum of CsPbBr3 crystals in the visible range. (c)
Energy-resolved gamma-radiation spectrum of 241Am recorded
with CsPbBr3 SCs biased at 40 V. (d) Photocurrent dependence
on bias (black dots) fitted by a Hecht model (red line).
(a) Transformed Kubelka–Munk spectrum of CsPbBr3 SCs. The inset shows the spectrum in a Tauc plot. (b) Photoresponsivity
spectrum of CsPbBr3 crystals in the visible range. (c)
Energy-resolved gamma-radiation spectrum of 241Am recorded
with CsPbBr3 SCs biased at 40 V. (d) Photocurrent dependence
on bias (black dots) fitted by a Hecht model (red line).For electronic transport and photon detection measurements,
we
deposited electrodes of Ag paste on opposite facets of the SCs. We
then tested CsPbBr3 SCs as detectors in the visible spectral
region and, at higher energies, of gamma-radiation from a 241Am source. The details of the experiments can be found in Supporting Information and in Figure S4. In the
visible region, a 1 order of magnitude increase of the current could
be detected under white light illumination with 5 mW·cm–2 power (inset in Figure b). The spectral responsivity under 10 V-bias shows a very
sharp (∼20 nm fwhm, centered at 550 nm) peak showing a responsivity
of 6 A/W. This peak is located near the CsPbBr3 bandgap
energy and may indicate a so-called narrow-bandwidth detection regime.[4,7] This can be explained by taking into consideration the spectral
dependence of the absorbance. The peak photocurrent is seen at the
long-wavelength tail of the absorption spectrum, at ∼550 nm
(compare Figures a
and 3b). Because of low absorbance at these
wavelengths, such light is primarily absorbed within the bulk of the
crystal. Even longer wavelengths correspond to higher and/or complete
transmission of light, whereas short wavelength light is absorbed
primarily within the surface region. The collection efficiency of
the carriers generated at the surface or near-surface region can be
poorer than that of carriers in the bulk, presumably due to a higher
density of trap states at the surfaces. Overall, the interplay between
the trapping at the surface and the wavelength-dependent absorbance
leads to the appearance of a narrow photocurrent peak near the band-edge
instead of simple cutoff behavior.Efficient photoconductivity
in the bulk of a SC is a prerequisite
for sensing deeply penetrating X-ray and especially gamma-photons.
This inspired us to test our CsPbBr3 SCs for the detection
of gamma-photons. We constructed a gamma-photon counting device, as
detailed in the SI and in our previous
studies on hybrid MAPbI3 and FAPbI3 SCs.[11] A high count rate could be detected, similar
to the hybrid perovskite SCs tested under identical conditions. We
then attempted to perform energy-resolved counting using standard
pulse-height analysis. With moderate cooling to −53 °C
(220 K), we could detect a broad photopeak from a 241Am
source, not seen at room temperature (Figure c). We also find that the increase of bias
from 20 to 40 V notably shifts the photopeak to higher channels of
the same multichannel analyzer and slightly improves the energy resolution,
illustrating that charge-collection efficiency remains a strongly
limiting factor. For efficient collection of carriers, a high mobility-lifetime
product (μτ) is crucial. Together with the applied electric
field, E, one can estimate carrier drift lengths
as μτE. This drift length must be at
least equal to the size of the whole SC for efficient collection of
photocarriers. For the evaluation of μτ within the bulk
of the crystal using electronic measurement, we have investigated
the bias-dependence of the photoconductivity at 550 nm (Figure d), the wavelength at which
we observed a peak photocurrent due to the prevalence of bulk transport.
This dependence was then fitted with a Hecht model,[51] yielding a μτ product of ∼2 × 10–4 cm2 V–1 which is slightly
lower than in Bridgman-grown CsPbBr3 SCs.[12] Typical μτ values for Cd1–ZnTe, the present commercial
room-temperature detector material, are close to 1 × 10–3 cm2 V–1. Similarly high values of 1–1.8
× 10–2 cm2 V–1 were also observed for SCs of hybrid perovskites MAPbI3 and FAPbI3 in our previous studies using the same measurement
method.[11] A smaller μτ product
in CsPbBr3 than for hybrid perovskites can be attributed
to shorter carrier lifetimes. In hybrid perovskites, asymmetric organic
cations form asymmetric electric fields that assist in carrier separation,
increasing carrier lifetimes.[52]Furthermore,
we compared the resistivity of solution-grown CsPbBr3 SCs
(2 GΩ cm) with the best values reported for Bridgman-grown
SCs (343 GΩ cm).[12] Such a difference
suggests that solution-grown SCs might incorporate impurities acting
as electronic dopants or have higher concentration of defects, thus
increasing the carrier density. Further work on the exclusion of these
impurities might lead to higher resistances, and hence more closely
representative intrinsic behavior, favorable for photon detection.In summary, we have shown that transparent CsPbBr3 SCs
can be grown from DMSO solutions using the ITC method. Owing to the
low density of traps and low carrier density, along with a moderately
high carrier mobility and a high gamma-photon absorptivity due to
being a heavy-metal based compound, a high sensitivity to gamma-irradiation
can be demonstrated. We find that higher doping levels from impurities,
as compared to Bridgman-grown SCs, still limits the energy resolution
of gamma-counting. Further optimization of the proposed synthetic
protocol may concern increasing the purity to reduce the doping level
and also surface engineering to decrease the density of traps.
Authors: Zhi-Kuang Tan; Reza Saberi Moghaddam; May Ling Lai; Pablo Docampo; Ruben Higler; Felix Deschler; Michael Price; Aditya Sadhanala; Luis M Pazos; Dan Credgington; Fabian Hanusch; Thomas Bein; Henry J Snaith; Richard H Friend Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2014-08-03 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Makhsud I Saidaminov; Ahmed L Abdelhady; Banavoth Murali; Erkki Alarousu; Victor M Burlakov; Wei Peng; Ibrahim Dursun; Lingfei Wang; Yao He; Giacomo Maculan; Alain Goriely; Tom Wu; Omar F Mohammed; Osman M Bakr Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Ye Yang; Yong Yan; Mengjin Yang; Sukgeun Choi; Kai Zhu; Joseph M Luther; Matthew C Beard Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Yihui He; Liviu Matei; Hee Joon Jung; Kyle M McCall; Michelle Chen; Constantinos C Stoumpos; Zhifu Liu; John A Peters; Duck Young Chung; Bruce W Wessels; Michael R Wasielewski; Vinayak P Dravid; Arnold Burger; Mercouri G Kanatzidis Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Vasilii V Belykh; Dmitri R Yakovlev; Mikhail M Glazov; Philipp S Grigoryev; Mujtaba Hussain; Janina Rautert; Dmitry N Dirin; Maksym V Kovalenko; Manfred Bayer Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-02-08 Impact factor: 14.919