Literature DB >> 29428853

A critical analysis of published data to discern the role of soil and sediment properties in determining sorption of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs).

Yasong Li1, Danielle P Oliver2, Rai S Kookana3.   

Abstract

Widespread usage of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) has caused major environmental contamination globally. The hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties of PFASs affect the sorption behaviour and suggest organic carbon may not be the only factor affecting sorption. We reviewed the quality of all data published in peer-reviewed literature on sorption of PFASs to critically evaluate the role organic carbon (OC) and other properties have in sorption of PFASs in soils or sediments. The largest data sets available were for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA, n = 147) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS, n = 178), and these analyses showed very weak correlations between sorption coefficient (Kd) and OC alone (R2 = 0.05-0.07). When only laboratory-derived Kd values of PFASs and OC were analysed, the R2 values increased for PFOA (R2 = 0.24, n = 42), PFOS (R2 = 0.38, n = 69), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA, R2 = 0.77 n = 12), and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA, R2 = 0.78, n = 13). However, the relationships were heavily skewed by one or two high OC values. Similarly there was no significant relationship between Kd values and pH for PFOS (R2 = 0.06) and PFOA (R2 = 0.07), across a range of environmental pH values. Our analyses showed sorption behaviour of a range of PFASs could not be explained by a single soil or sediment property. Multiple regression models better explained the sorption behaviour of a number of PFASs. Regressions of OC and pH together explained a significant proportion of the variation in Kd values for 9 out of 14 PFASs and 8 of these regressions had ≥10 data points. This review highlighted that at least OC, pH and clay content are properties having significant effect on sorption. There is a clear need for more data and studies with thorough characterisation of soils or sediments to better understand their role in PFASs sorption. Current assessments based on OC alone are likely to be erroneous. Crown
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Organic carbon; PFOA; PFOS; Soil; Sorption coefficient; pH

Year:  2018        PMID: 29428853     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  14 in total

1.  Temporal and spatial analysis of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances in surface waters of Houston ship channel following a large-scale industrial fire incident.

Authors:  Noor A Aly; Yu-Syuan Luo; Yina Liu; Gaston Casillas; Thomas J McDonald; James M Kaihatu; Mikyoung Jun; Nicholas Ellis; Sarah Gossett; James N Dodds; Erin S Baker; Sharmila Bhandari; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Neutral polyfluoroalkyl and perfluoroalkyl substances in surface water and sediment from the Haihe River and Dagu Drainage Canal deserve more attention.

Authors:  Xia Hua; Jianbo Luo; Zhen Zhao; Qi Wang; Hongwen Sun
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Limitations of Current Approaches for Predicting Groundwater Vulnerability from PFAS Contamination in the Vadose Zone.

Authors:  Matt Rovero; Diana Cutt; Rachel Griffiths; Urszula Filipowicz; Katherine Mishkin; Brad White; Sandra Goodrow; Richard T Wilkin
Journal:  Ground Water Monit Remediat       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 1.870

4.  Estimating the relative magnitudes of adsorption to solid-water and air/oil-water interfaces for per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Thermal desorption as a high removal remediation technique for soils contaminated with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs).

Authors:  M Sörengård; A-S Lindh; L Ahrens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Challenges and Current Status of the Biological Treatment of PFAS-Contaminated Soils.

Authors:  Esmaeil Shahsavari; Duncan Rouch; Leadin S Khudur; Duncan Thomas; Arturo Aburto-Medina; Andrew S Ball
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 7.  Remediation of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contaminated soils - To mobilize or to immobilize or to degrade?

Authors:  Nanthi Bolan; Binoy Sarkar; Yubo Yan; Qiao Li; Hasintha Wijesekara; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Daniel C W Tsang; Marina Schauerte; Julian Bosch; Hendrik Noll; Yong Sik Ok; Kirk Scheckel; Jurate Kumpiene; Kapish Gobindlal; Melanie Kah; Jonathan Sperry; M B Kirkham; Hailong Wang; Yiu Fai Tsang; Deyi Hou; Jörg Rinklebe
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 10.588

8.  Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Exposure in Early Life Increases Risk of Childhood Adiposity: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Pingping Liu; Fang Yang; Yongbo Wang; Zhanpeng Yuan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  A Review of the Applications, Environmental Release, and Remediation Technologies of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.

Authors:  Jay N Meegoda; Jitendra A Kewalramani; Brian Li; Richard W Marsh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Reductive Defluorination and Mechanochemical Decomposition of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): From Present Knowledge to Future Remediation Concepts.

Authors:  Philipp Roesch; Christian Vogel; Franz-Georg Simon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.