Literature DB >> 32574947

Temporal and spatial analysis of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances in surface waters of Houston ship channel following a large-scale industrial fire incident.

Noor A Aly1, Yu-Syuan Luo1, Yina Liu2, Gaston Casillas3, Thomas J McDonald4, James M Kaihatu5, Mikyoung Jun6, Nicholas Ellis7, Sarah Gossett7, James N Dodds8, Erin S Baker8, Sharmila Bhandari1, Weihsueh A Chiu1, Ivan Rusyn9.   

Abstract

Firefighting foams contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) - a class of compounds widely used as surfactants. PFAS are persistent organic pollutants that have been reported in waterways and drinking water systems across the United States. These substances are of interest to both regulatory agencies and the general public because of their persistence in the environment and association with adverse health effects. PFAS can be released in large quantities during industrial incidents because they are present in most firefighting foams used to suppress chemical fires; however, little is known about persistence of PFAS in public waterways after such events. In response to large-scale fires at Intercontinental Terminal Company (ITC) in Houston, Texas in March 2019, almost 5 million liters of class B firefighting foams were used. Much of this material flowed into the Houston Ship Channel and Galveston Bay (HSC/GB) and concerns were raised about the levels of PFAS in these water bodies that have commercial and recreational uses. To evaluate the impact of the ITC incident response on PFAS levels in HSC/GB, we collected 52 surface water samples from 12 locations over a 6-month period after the incident. Samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to evaluate 27 PFAS, including perfluorocarboxylic acids, perfluorosulfonates and fluorotelomers. Among PFAS that were evaluated, 6:2 FTS and PFOS were detected at highest concentrations. Temporal and spatial profiles of PFAS were established; we found a major peak in the level of many PFAS in the days and weeks after the incident and a gradual decline over several months with patterns consistent with the tide- and wave-associated water movements. This work documents the impact of a large-scale industrial fire, on the environmental levels of PFAS, establishes a baseline concentration of PFAS in HSC/GB, and highlights the critical need for development of PFAS water quality standards.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32574947      PMCID: PMC7857671          DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  44 in total

1.  Degradation and defluorination of 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonamidoalkyl betaine and 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate by Gordonia sp. strain NB4-1Y under sulfur-limiting conditions.

Authors:  Dayton M J Shaw; Gabriel Munoz; Eric M Bottos; Sung Vo Duy; Sébastien Sauvé; Jinxia Liu; Jonathan D Van Hamme
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Monitoring perfluorinated surfactants in biota and surface water samples following an accidental release of fire-fighting foam into Etobicoke Creek.

Authors:  Cheryl A Moody; Jonathan W Martin; Wai Chi Kwan; Derek C G Muir; Scott A Mabury
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Discovery of 40 Classes of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Historical Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFFs) and AFFF-Impacted Groundwater.

Authors:  Krista A Barzen-Hanson; Simon C Roberts; Sarah Choyke; Karl Oetjen; Alan McAlees; Nicole Riddell; Robert McCrindle; P Lee Ferguson; Christopher P Higgins; Jennifer A Field
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  PFAS health effects database: Protocol for a systematic evidence map.

Authors:  Katherine E Pelch; Anna Reade; Taylor A M Wolffe; Carol F Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  Temporal monitoring of perfluorooctane sulfonate accumulation in aquatic biota downstream of historical aqueous film forming foam use areas.

Authors:  Heather A Lanza; Rebecca S Cochran; Joseph F Mudge; Adric D Olson; Brett R Blackwell; Jonathan D Maul; Christopher J Salice; Todd A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Identification and Fate of Aqueous Film Forming Foam Derived Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in a Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Authors:  Erika Houtz; Miaomiao Wang; June-Soo Park
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  An investigation into per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in nineteen Australian wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs).

Authors:  Timothy L Coggan; Damien Moodie; Adam Kolobaric; Drew Szabo; Jeff Shimeta; Nicholas D Crosbie; Elliot Lee; Milena Fernandes; Bradley O Clarke
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-08-23

8.  A Chemical Category-Based Prioritization Approach for Selecting 75 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) for Tiered Toxicity and Toxicokinetic Testing.

Authors:  Grace Patlewicz; Ann M Richard; Antony J Williams; Christopher M Grulke; Reeder Sams; Jason Lambert; Pamela D Noyes; Michael J DeVito; Ronald N Hines; Mark Strynar; Annette Guiseppi-Elie; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Using participatory design to develop (public) health decision support systems through GIS.

Authors:  S Michelle Dredger; Anita Kothari; Jason Morrison; Michael Sawada; Eric J Crighton; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 3.918

10.  PFOA and cancer in a highly exposed community: new findings from the C8 science panel.

Authors:  Wendee Nicole
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  6 in total

1.  Rapid Characterization of Emerging Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Using Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Yu-Syuan Luo; Noor A Aly; James McCord; Mark J Strynar; Weihsueh A Chiu; James N Dodds; Erin S Baker; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in Houston Ship Channel and Galveston Bay following a large-scale industrial fire using ion-mobility-spectrometry-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Alan Valdiviezo; Noor A Aly; Yu-Syuan Luo; Alexandra Cordova; Gaston Casillas; MaKayla Foster; Erin S Baker; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2021-08-22       Impact factor: 5.565

3.  Biosensor applications in contaminated estuaries: Implications for disaster research response.

Authors:  Krisa Camargo; Mary Ann Vogelbein; Jennifer A Horney; Timothy M Dellapenna; Anthony H Knap; Jose L Sericano; Terry L Wade; Thomas J McDonald; Weihsueh A Chiu; Michael A Unger
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 8.431

4.  Utilizing ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry for the characterization and detection of persistent organic pollutants and their metabolites.

Authors:  Noor A Aly; James N Dodds; Yu-Syuan Luo; Fabian A Grimm; MaKayla Foster; Ivan Rusyn; Erin S Baker
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.478

5.  Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Impacts of Hurricane Florence on Criteria Air Pollutants and Air Toxics in Eastern North Carolina.

Authors:  Sharmila Bhandari; Gaston Casillas; Noor A Aly; Rui Zhu; Galen Newman; Fred A Wright; Anthony Miller; Gabriela Adler; Ivan Rusyn; Weihsueh A Chiu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Potential Human Health Hazard of Post-Hurricane Harvey Sediments in Galveston Bay and Houston Ship Channel: A Case Study of Using In Vitro Bioactivity Data to Inform Risk Management Decisions.

Authors:  Zunwei Chen; Suji Jang; James M Kaihatu; Yi-Hui Zhou; Fred A Wright; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.