Literature DB >> 29427859

Preliminary concurrent validity of the Fitbit-Zip and ActiGraph activity monitors for measuring steps in people with polymyalgia rheumatica.

Anish Chandrasekar1, Elizabeth M A Hensor2, Sarah L Mackie3, Michael R Backhouse4, Emma Harris5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Activity monitors provide objective measurements of physical activity, however, the accuracy of these devices in people with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to obtain preliminary evidence of the accuracy of two activity monitors and explore if clinical and gait-related factors altered device accuracy in people with PMR.
METHODS: The ActiGraph with low frequency extension (+LFE) and standard (-LFE) algorithms, Fitbit-Zip (waist) and Fitbit-Zip (shirt) were concurrently tested using a two-minute walk test (2MWT) and stairs test in 27 people with PMR currently treated with prednisolone. To determine accuracy, activity monitor step-count was compared to a gold-standard step-count (GSSC; calculated from video recording) using Bland-Altman plots.
RESULTS: The Fitbit-Zip (waist) achieved closest agreement to the GSSC for the 2MWT (mean bias (95%CI): 10 (-3, 23); 95%LOA: -55, 74). The ActiGraph (+LFE) achieved closest agreement to the GSSC for the stairs test (mean bias (95%CI): 0 (-1, 1); 95%LOA: -5, 5). The ActiGraph (-LFE) performed poorly in both tests. All devices demonstrated reduced accuracy in participants with lower gait velocity, reduced stride length, longer double-limb support phase and greater self-reported functional impairment.
CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results suggest that in controlled conditions, the Fitbit-Zip fairly accurately measures step-count during walking in people with PMR receiving treatment. However, device error was greater than data published in healthy people. The ActiGraph may not be recommended without activation of the LFE. We identified clinical and gait-related factors associated with higher levels of functional impairment that reduced device accuracy. Further work is required to evaluate the validity of the activity monitors in field conditions.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerometers; Activity monitoring; Device comparison; Physical activity; Polymyalgia rheumatica; Step-count

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29427859     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.01.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  8 in total

1.  Accurate Step Count with Generalized and Personalized Deep Learning on Accelerometer Data.

Authors:  Long Luu; Arvind Pillai; Halsey Lea; Ruben Buendia; Faisal M Khan; Glynn Dennis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Reliability Study of Inertial Sensors LIS2DH12 Compared to ActiGraph GT9X: Based on Free Code.

Authors:  Jaime Martín-Martín; Ariadna Jiménez-Partinen; Irene De-Torres; Adrian Escriche-Escuder; Manuel González-Sánchez; Antonio Muro-Culebras; Cristina Roldán-Jiménez; María Ruiz-Muñoz; Fermín Mayoral-Cleries; Attila Biró; Wen Tang; Borjanka Nikolova; Alfredo Salvatore; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-05

3.  Getting Active Mindfully: Rationale and Case Illustration of a Group Mind-body and Activity Program for Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Jonathan Greenberg; Ann Lin; Paula J Popok; Ronald J Kulich; Robert R Edwards; Ana-Maria Vranceanu
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2021-01-19

4.  Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable and smartphone step count: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network.

Authors:  William Johnston; Pedro B Judice; Pablo Molina García; Jan M Mühlen; Esben Lykke Skovgaard; Julie Stang; Moritz Schumann; Shulin Cheng; Wilhelm Bloch; Jan Christian Brønd; Ulf Ekelund; Anders Grøntved; Brian Caulfield; Francisco B Ortega; Luis B Sardinha
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Development And Early Feasibility Testing Of A Mind-Body Physical Activity Program For Patients With Heterogeneous Chronic Pain; The GetActive Study.

Authors:  Jonathan Greenberg; Ann Lin; Emily L Zale; Ronald J Kulich; Peter James; Rachel A Millstein; Hannah Shapiro; Michael E Schatman; Robert R Edwards; Ana-Maria Vranceanu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Step and Distance Measurement From a Low-Cost Consumer-Based Hip and Wrist Activity Monitor: Protocol for a Validity and Reliability Assessment.

Authors:  Thomas Carlin; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-01-13

7.  Windows Into Human Health Through Wearables Data Analytics.

Authors:  Daniel Witt; Ryan Kellogg; Michael Snyder; Jessilyn Dunn
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-01-28

8.  Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel Fuller; Emily Colwell; Jonathan Low; Kassia Orychock; Melissa Ann Tobin; Bo Simango; Richard Buote; Desiree Van Heerden; Hui Luan; Kimberley Cullen; Logan Slade; Nathan G A Taylor
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 4.773

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.