W H Man1, A Pérez-Pitarch2,3, I Wilting1,4, E R Heerdink1,4, W W van Solinge5, A C G Egberts1,4, A D R Huitema1,6. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands. 2. Pharmacy Department, University Clinical Hospital of Valencia, Spain. 3. Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Valencia, Spain. 4. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands.
Abstract
AIMS: Previously, we have reported an association between clozapine use and elevated FL3 neutrophil fluorescence, a flow-cytometric parameter for cell viability. Here, we developed and evaluated a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model relating FL3-fluorescence to clozapine exposure and derived a nomogram for estimation of long-term adherence. METHODS: Data from 27 patients initiating clozapine were analysed using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. A previously described pharmacokinetic model for clozapine was coupled to a FL3 fluorescence model. For this, an effect compartment with clozapine concentrations as input and a first order decay rate as output was linked with an Emax model to FL3-fluorescence. FL3-fluorescence was simulated for clozapine doses of 50, 150 and 400 mg daily (n = 10 000) to establish the nomogram. Finally, true simulated adherence (% of daily doses taken over 100 days) was compared to nomogram-estimated adherence to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. RESULTS: The half-life of FL3-fluorescence was estimated at 228 h (coefficient of variation 35%). Median absolute prediction errors of the nomogram in case of fully random adherence for 50, 150 and 400 mg ranged from -0.193% to -0.525%. The nomogram performed slightly worse in case of nonrandom adherence (median prediction error up to 5.19%), but was still clinically acceptable. Compliance patterns containing longer drug holidays revealed that the nomogram adequately estimates compliance over approximately the last 3 weeks prior to FL3-measurement. CONCLUSION: Our nomogram could provide information regarding long-term adherence based on prescribed clozapine dose and FL3-fluorescence. Future studies should further explore the clinical value of this biomarker and nomogram.
AIMS: Previously, we have reported an association between clozapine use and elevated FL3 neutrophil fluorescence, a flow-cytometric parameter for cell viability. Here, we developed and evaluated a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model relating FL3-fluorescence to clozapine exposure and derived a nomogram for estimation of long-term adherence. METHODS: Data from 27 patients initiating clozapine were analysed using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. A previously described pharmacokinetic model for clozapine was coupled to a FL3 fluorescence model. For this, an effect compartment with clozapine concentrations as input and a first order decay rate as output was linked with an Emax model to FL3-fluorescence. FL3-fluorescence was simulated for clozapine doses of 50, 150 and 400 mg daily (n = 10 000) to establish the nomogram. Finally, true simulated adherence (% of daily doses taken over 100 days) was compared to nomogram-estimated adherence to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. RESULTS: The half-life of FL3-fluorescence was estimated at 228 h (coefficient of variation 35%). Median absolute prediction errors of the nomogram in case of fully random adherence for 50, 150 and 400 mg ranged from -0.193% to -0.525%. The nomogram performed slightly worse in case of nonrandom adherence (median prediction error up to 5.19%), but was still clinically acceptable. Compliance patterns containing longer drug holidays revealed that the nomogram adequately estimates compliance over approximately the last 3 weeks prior to FL3-measurement. CONCLUSION: Our nomogram could provide information regarding long-term adherence based on prescribed clozapine dose and FL3-fluorescence. Future studies should further explore the clinical value of this biomarker and nomogram.
Authors: E Spina; A Avenoso; G Facciolà; M G Scordo; M Ancione; A G Madia; A Ventimiglia; E Perucca Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Olalla Caseiro; Rocío Pérez-Iglesias; Ignacio Mata; Obdulia Martínez-Garcia; Jose Maria Pelayo-Terán; Rafael Tabares-Seisdedos; Victor Ortiz-García de la Foz; José L Vázquez-Barquero; Benedicto Crespo-Facorro Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: W Laan; Y van der Does; B Sezgi; H M Smeets; J J Stolker; N J de Wit; E R Heerdink Journal: Pharmacopsychiatry Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 5.788
Authors: Robert Müller; Ian Mellors; Berit Johannessen; Aasne K Aarsand; Paul Kiefer; John Hardy; Richard Kendall; Colin Stephen Scott Journal: Lab Hematol Date: 2006
Authors: S Mennickent; A Sobarzo; M Vega; M de Diego; G Godoy; P Rioseco; L Saavedra Journal: Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract Date: 2010-01-08 Impact factor: 1.812
Authors: Simon D Harding; Joanna L Sharman; Elena Faccenda; Chris Southan; Adam J Pawson; Sam Ireland; Alasdair J G Gray; Liam Bruce; Stephen P H Alexander; Stephen Anderton; Clare Bryant; Anthony P Davenport; Christian Doerig; Doriano Fabbro; Francesca Levi-Schaffer; Michael Spedding; Jamie A Davies Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: W H Man; A Pérez-Pitarch; I Wilting; E R Heerdink; W W van Solinge; A C G Egberts; A D R Huitema Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-04-02 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Jose de Leon; Can-Jun Ruan; Georgios Schoretsanitis; Carlos De Las Cuevas Journal: Psychother Psychosom Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 17.659
Authors: Sera A J de With; Wai H Man; Coen Maas; Maarten Ten Berg; Wiepke Cahn; Arnold C Koekman; Wouter W van Solinge; Tamar Tak Journal: Pharmacol Res Perspect Date: 2020-10