Robert E Burke1,2,3, Jacqueline Jones4, Emily Lawrence5, Amy Ladebue5, Roman Ayele5, Chelsea Leonard5, Brandi Lippmann5, Daniel D Matlock6,7,8, Rebecca Allyn9, Ethan Cumbler10. 1. Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation at the Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA. Robert.Burke5@va.gov. 2. Hospital Medicine Section, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA. Robert.Burke5@va.gov. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. Robert.Burke5@va.gov. 4. University of Colorado College of Nursing, Aurora, CO, USA. 5. Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation at the Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA. 6. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. 7. VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Denver, CO, USA. 8. Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA. 9. Department of Medicine, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA. 10. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite a national focus on post-acute care brought about by recent payment reforms, relatively little is known about how hospitalized older adults and their caregivers decide whether to go to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand to what extent hospitalized older adults and their caregivers are empowered to make a high-quality decision about utilizing an SNF for post-acute care and what contextual or process elements led to satisfaction with the outcome of their decision once in SNF. DESIGN: Qualitative inquiry using the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF), a conceptual framework that describes key components of high-quality decision-making. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two previously community-dwelling older adults (≥ 65 years old) and 22 caregivers interviewed at three different hospitals and three skilled nursing facilities. MAIN MEASURES: We used key components of the ODSF to identify elements of context and process that affected decision-making and to what extent the outcome was characteristic of a high-quality decision: informed, values based, and not associated with regret or blame. KEY RESULTS: The most important contextual themes were the presence of active medical conditions in the hospital that made decision-making difficult, prior experiences with hospital readmission or SNF, relative level of caregiver support, and pressure to make a decision quickly for which participants felt unprepared. Patients described playing a passive role in the decision-making process and largely relying on recommendations from the medical team. Patients commonly expressed resignation and a perceived lack of choice or autonomy, leading to dissatisfaction with the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding and intervening to improve the quality of decision-making regarding post-acute care supports is essential for improving outcomes of hospitalized older adults. Our results suggest that simply providing information is not sufficient; rather, incorporating key contextual factors and improving the decision-making process for both patients and clinicians are also essential.
BACKGROUND: Despite a national focus on post-acute care brought about by recent payment reforms, relatively little is known about how hospitalized older adults and their caregivers decide whether to go to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand to what extent hospitalized older adults and their caregivers are empowered to make a high-quality decision about utilizing an SNF for post-acute care and what contextual or process elements led to satisfaction with the outcome of their decision once in SNF. DESIGN: Qualitative inquiry using the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF), a conceptual framework that describes key components of high-quality decision-making. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two previously community-dwelling older adults (≥ 65 years old) and 22 caregivers interviewed at three different hospitals and three skilled nursing facilities. MAIN MEASURES: We used key components of the ODSF to identify elements of context and process that affected decision-making and to what extent the outcome was characteristic of a high-quality decision: informed, values based, and not associated with regret or blame. KEY RESULTS: The most important contextual themes were the presence of active medical conditions in the hospital that made decision-making difficult, prior experiences with hospital readmission or SNF, relative level of caregiver support, and pressure to make a decision quickly for which participants felt unprepared. Patients described playing a passive role in the decision-making process and largely relying on recommendations from the medical team. Patients commonly expressed resignation and a perceived lack of choice or autonomy, leading to dissatisfaction with the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding and intervening to improve the quality of decision-making regarding post-acute care supports is essential for improving outcomes of hospitalized older adults. Our results suggest that simply providing information is not sufficient; rather, incorporating key contextual factors and improving the decision-making process for both patients and clinicians are also essential.
Authors: Susan P Bell; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Avantika A Saraf; J M L Jacobsen; Sunil Kripalani; Amanda S Mixon; John F Schnelle; Sandra F Simmons Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-04-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Colleen K McIlvennan; Jacqueline Jones; Larry A Allen; Keith M Swetz; Carolyn Nowels; Daniel D Matlock Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Robert E Burke; Anne Canamucio; Thomas J Glorioso; Anna E Barón; Kira L Ryskina Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Marina S McCreight; Heather M Gilmartin; Chelsea A Leonard; Ashlea L Mayberry; Lynette R Kelley; Brandi K Lippmann; Andrew S Coy; Tiffany A Radcliff; Murray J Côté; Robert E Burke Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Robert E Burke; Chelsea Leonard; Marcie Lee; Roman Ayele; Ethan Cumbler; Rebecca Allyn; S Ryan Greysen Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Patricia A Valverde; Roman Ayele; Chelsea Leonard; Ethan Cumbler; Rebecca Allyn; Robert E Burke Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Roman Ayele; Kirstin A Manges; Chelsea Leonard; Marcie Lee; Emily Galenbeck; Mithu Molla; Cari Levy; Robert E Burke Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-09-14 Impact factor: 7.802
Authors: Roger Y Kim; Terrence E Murphy; Margaret Doyle; Catherine Pulaski; Maura Singh; Sui Tsang; Dawn Wicker; Margaret A Pisani; Geoffrey R Connors; Lauren E Ferrante Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2019-11-11