Literature DB >> 29425743

Is MGMT promoter methylation to be considered in the decision making for recurrent surgery in glioblastoma patients?

Andrej Pala1, Anne Lea Schmitz2, Andreas Knoll2, Max Schneider2, Michal Hlavac2, Ralph König2, Christian Rainer Wirtz2, Jan Coburger2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: At present, there is no standard therapy approved for recurrent glioblastoma (rGB). In particular, the counselling of patients with an unmethylated O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter GB remains a challenge. Our aim was to compare the overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients treated surgically and non-surgically at the time of GB recurrence. This was evaluated with particular reference to the impact of recurrent surgery for patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter rGB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinical and radiological data from 127 consecutive cases of rGB was retrospectively identified and evaluated. The PFS and OS from cohorts of surgically and non-surgically treated patients at time of GB recurrence were compared using Kaplan Meier estimations and Log-Rank tests. Multivariate Cox regression analysis included the major influencing variables (surgical resection, MGMT promoter methylation status, Karnofsky performance scale (KPS), age, eloquent tumor location) to analyze the survival benefit. Subgroup analysis of cases depending on the MGMT promoter methylation status was performed.
RESULTS: Multiple Cox regression analysis revealed inferior OS (p = 0.029, OR = 1.731, CI 95% 1.059-2.829) of patients treated non-surgically (14 vs. 31 months). MGMT promoter methylation and age were related to longer OS (p < 0.001, OR 2.683, CI 95% 1.631-4.414 and p = 0.009, OR = 1.029, CI95% 1.007-0.052 respectively). Gross total resection (GTR) in comparison to subtotal resection (STR) lead to a median OS of 39 months vs. 22 months and a PFS of seven vs. four months respectively. In the subgroup of cases with unmethylated MGMT promoter rGB, those who underwent GTR survived significantly longer (OS: 31 months) than patients who underwent STR (OS: 15 months, p = 0.024). PFS was six vs. four months after GTR and STR respectively.
CONCLUSION: Surgical management for recurrent glioblastoma appears to be a safe procedure which results in longer OS in comparison to non-surgical management. GTR may be of particular benefit to patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter rGB.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gross total resection; MGMT; Overall survival; Progression free survival; Recurrent glioblastoma; Reoperation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29425743     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  6 in total

Review 1.  How We Treat Recurrent Glioblastoma Today and Current Evidence.

Authors:  Caroline Chaul-Barbosa; Daniel Fernandes Marques
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Histopathologic quantification of viable tumor versus treatment effect in surgically resected recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Stephen J Bagley; Robert D Schwab; Ernest Nelson; Angela N Viaene; Zev A Binder; Robert A Lustig; Donald M O'Rourke; Steven Brem; Arati S Desai; MacLean P Nasrallah
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Dynamic expression of 11 miRNAs in 83 consecutive primary and corresponding recurrent glioblastoma: correlation to treatment, time to recurrence, overall survival and MGMT methylation status.

Authors:  Bostjan Matos; Emanuela Bostjancic; Alenka Matjasic; Mara Popovic; Damjan Glavac
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  The Impact of MGMT Promoter Methylation and Temozolomide Treatment in Serbian Patients with Primary Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Nikola Jovanović; Tatjana Mitrović; Vladimir J Cvetković; Svetlana Tošić; Jelena Vitorović; Slaviša Stamenković; Vesna Nikolov; Aleksandar Kostić; Nataša Vidović; Miljan Krstić; Tatjana Jevtović-Stoimenov; Dušica Pavlović
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 5.  Clinical strategies to manage adult glioblastoma patients without MGMT hypermethylation.

Authors:  Delin Liu; Tianrui Yang; Wenbin Ma; Yu Wang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Prognostic Analysis of the IDH1 G105G (rs11554137) SNP in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Ayoub Saaid; Matteo Monticelli; Alessia Andrea Ricci; Giulia Orlando; Cristina Botta; Pietro Zeppa; Andrea Bianconi; Simona Osella-Abate; Francesco Bruno; Alessia Pellerino; Roberta Rudà; Paola Cassoni; Diego Garbossa; Fabio Cofano; Luca Bertero
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.141

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.