Literature DB >> 22469394

Leishmania resistance to miltefosine associated with genetic marker.

Sandrine Cojean, Sandrine Houzé, Djamel Haouchine, Françoise Huteau, Sylvie Lariven, Véronique Hubert, Florence Michard, Christian Bories, Francine Pratlong, Jacques Le Bras, Philippe Marie Loiseau, Sophie Matheron.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22469394      PMCID: PMC3309694          DOI: 10.3201/eid1804.110841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: During 2000–2010, serial Leishmania isolates obtained from an HIV-infected patient who was not responding to treatment showed a gradual decrease in in vitro miltefosine susceptibility. We performed L. donovani miltefosine transporter (Ldmt) gene analysis to identify an association between miltefosine resistance of reference L. donovani lines and variability in miltefosine response of L. infantum isolates. A new single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), L832F, was identified, which might be a marker of miltefosine resistance in leishmaniasis. The patient, a 46-year-old woman, had lived in France since 1994 but regularly returned to Algeria, her country of birth. HIV-1 infection was diagnosed in 1991. Antiretroviral therapy was initiated in 1993, leading to undetectable viral load and a CD4+ T-cell count of 185 cells/mm3 (reference >450/mm3). Concurrent conditions were thoracic herpes zoster in 1996, hairy leukoplakia of tongue, oropharyngeal candidiasis, and chronic renal failure of unknown cause since 2000. Visceral leishmaniasis was diagnosed in 1998 by culture of a bone marrow smear, which showed intracellular amastigotes. Use of meglumine antimonate (Glucantime; Sanofi, Paris, France), a drug of choice for the treatment of leishmaniasis, was contraindicated because of pancreatitis in the patient and in vitro isolate susceptibility variation; therefore, induction therapy consisted of liposomal amphotericin B (AmpB [AmBisome; Astellas Pharma US, Deerfield, IL, USA]) at a dose of 3 mg/kg/d for 5 consecutive days, then 1× week for 5 weeks (total dose 30 mg/kg) during 1998–2000 (Table). The same medication was administered for relapses at 4 mg/kg/d for 5 days, then 4 mg/kg 1× week for 5 weeks (total dose 40 mg/kg) during 2001–2010. Given the adverse effects of AmpB and the availability of oral miltefosine (Impavido; AEterna Zentaris Inc., Quebec City, Quebec, Canada), the latter drug was used for maintenance treatment during 2001–2007 at 50 mg 2×/d. Leishmaniasis was monitored by leukocytoconcentration and culture of blood samples on Novy-Nicolle-McNeal medium.
Table

Comparions of IC50 for AmpB and miltefosine against promastigotes and axenic amastigotes and distribution of LdMT SNPs in Leishmania infantum isolates and reference strains*

IsolateYearAmpBMiltefosineIC50, µmol/L ± SEM
Ldmt SNP
AmpB

Miltefosine
PromastigotesAxenic amastigotesPromastigotesAxenic amastigotes
19983 mg/kg/d × 5 d; then 1×/wk × 5 wk
S120003 mg/kg/d × 5 d; then 1×/wk × 5 wk0.09 ± 0.04†0.10 ± 0.037.14 ± 0.56†5.00± ± 0.7†L832
20014 mg/kg/d × 5 d; then 1×/wk × 5 wk50 mg 2×/d
S320054 mg/kg/d × 5 d; then 1×/wk × 5 wk‡0.13 ± 0.030.20 ± 0.0325.93 ± 1.46†21.00 ± 1.50†832L/F
S40.24 ± 0.01†0.15 ± 0.0227.89 ± 1.76†31.90 ± 1.60†
20074 mg/kg/d × 5 d; then 1×/wk × 5 wk
S620084 mg/kg/d × 5 d; then 1×/wk × 5 wk0.16 ± 0.030.11 ± 0.0344.30 ± 3.70†50.10 ± 1.00†832F
S720104 mg/kg/d × 5 d; then 1×/wk × 5 wkL832
Reference strain
LV9 WT0.03 ± 0.020.02 ± 0.054.46 ± 0.29†6.20 ± 0.3L832
LV9 Miltefosine-R0.22 ± 0.040.70 ± 0.0945.84 ± 2.40†54.20 ± 2.20†832F
DD8 WT0.06 ± 0.02†0.05 ± 0.03†17.40 ± 1.7012.40 ± 1.50L832
DD8 AmpB-R1.42 ± 0.06†1.00 ± 0.07†15.20 ± 1.0010.30 ± 1.20L832

*IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration; AmpB, amphotericin B; Ldmt, Leishmania donovani miltefosine transporter gene; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; –, assay not performed because sample unavailable or not culturable; WT, wild type; R, resistant.
†Significance was analyzed by using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test to compare the IC50 of the isolates with the IC50 of reference strains; p<0.01 was considered significant. IC50 of AmpB and miltefosine was compared with IC50 of reference strains and S1/S3, S1/S4, and S1/S6. Miltefosine: S1/S3, S1/S4, S1/S6, S4/S6; p<0.01. AmpB: S1/S4 significant p<0.01; S1/S3, S1/S6 not significant.
‡For each relapse.

*IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration; AmpB, amphotericin B; Ldmt, Leishmania donovani miltefosine transporter gene; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; –, assay not performed because sample unavailable or not culturable; WT, wild type; R, resistant.
†Significance was analyzed by using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test to compare the IC50 of the isolates with the IC50 of reference strains; p<0.01 was considered significant. IC50 of AmpB and miltefosine was compared with IC50 of reference strains and S1/S3, S1/S4, and S1/S6. Miltefosine: S1/S3, S1/S4, S1/S6, S4/S6; p<0.01. AmpB: S1/S4 significant p<0.01; S1/S3, S1/S6 not significant.
‡For each relapse. When signs of biological and clinical relapse appeared, bone marrow was aspirated for parasite detection. After culture of the aspirate and isoenzyme determination, the strain was identified as L. infantum, zymodeme MON-24. Eleven relapses were documented; all were confirmed by positive direct examination of bone marrow or blood, but cultures of only 7 samples yielded positive results (Table). The susceptibility of 4 cryopreserved isolates (S1, S3, S4, and S6; Table) to AmpB and to miltefosine was studied in the in vitro promastigote and axenic amastigote form by determining the concentrations inhibiting parasite growth by 50% (,). The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) was determined in parallel for the following reference L. donovani lines: a wild-type L. donovani LV9 (MHOM/ET/67/HU3) line (LV9 WT), a wild-type L. donovani DD8 (MHOM/IN/80/DD8) line (DD8 WT), a laboratory miltefosine-resistant line obtained from LV9 WT (LV9 miltefosine-R, resistant to 90 μmol/L miltefosine), and the laboratory AmB-resistant line obtained from DD8 WT (DD8 AmB-R, resistant to 1.4 μmol/L AmB) on promastigote and axenic amastigote forms (,). The AmB susceptibility of the isolates did not change notably over time; IC50 values ranged from 0.09 µmol/L to 0.24 µmol/L, regardless of parasite form, similar to those of wild-type reference strains (Table). In contrast, the IC50 values of miltefosine increased greatly over time, from 5.00 µmol/L to 50.10 μmol/L. During the 6 years of follow-up with miltefosine maintenance therapy, the susceptibility of the isolate (S6) obtained 6 months after miltefosine treatment withdrawal in 2008 was 6-fold higher than that of the first isolate (S1) obtained in 2000. The L. donovani miltefosine transporter protein (LdMT) promotes miltefosine translocation (), and LdMT inactivation in L. donovani promastigotes leads to miltefosine resistance at the promastigote and amastigote stages (). In 2003 and 2006 studies, several mutations were linked to the inability of parasites to take up miltefosine and to miltefosine resistance (,). In a 2009 study, the weak expression of LdMT and its β subunit LdROS3 in L. braziliensis isolates was linked to diminished sensitivity (). We sequenced the entire Ldmt gene (3,294 bp) in the reference strains and the clinical isolates for SNP analysis (,). Only 1 new SNP, L832F, was found in the miltefosine-resistant reference strain (LV9 miltefosine-R) and in clinical isolate S6. The L832 wild-type allele was found in isolate S1 and in the miltefosine-sensitive reference lines (LV9, DD8, and DD8 AmpB-R), whereas both alleles were found in isolates S3 and S4, with a decrease in the wild-type allele (Table). The last isolate, which was obtained 3 years after miltefosine withdrawal and could not be subcultured, had reverted to the wild-type allele (L832). These results point to a relation between the 832F allele and diminished susceptibility to miltefosine. Analysis of this case of miltefosine resistance in a patient co-infected with Leishmania sp. and HIV strongly suggests that an SNP (L832F) in the Ldmt gene could represent a molecular marker of miltefosine resistance in L. infantum and L. donovani.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of experimental resistance of Leishmania to miltefosine: Implications for clinical use.

Authors:  F Javier Pérez-Victoria; María P Sánchez-Cañete; Karin Seifert; Simon L Croft; Shyam Sundar; Santiago Castanys; Francisco Gamarro
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2006 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 18.500

2.  Mechanism of amphotericin B resistance in Leishmania donovani promastigotes.

Authors:  N Mbongo; P M Loiseau; M A Billion; M Robert-Gero
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Functional cloning of the miltefosine transporter. A novel P-type phospholipid translocase from Leishmania involved in drug resistance.

Authors:  F Javier Pérez-Victoria; Francisco Gamarro; Marc Ouellette; Santiago Castanys
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-09-27       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Low plasma membrane expression of the miltefosine transport complex renders Leishmania braziliensis refractory to the drug.

Authors:  María P Sánchez-Cañete; Luís Carvalho; F Javier Pérez-Victoria; Francisco Gamarro; Santiago Castanys
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Selection of the most promising 2-substituted quinoline as antileishmanial candidate for clinical trials.

Authors:  Nashira Campos Vieira; Christine Herrenknecht; Joel Vacus; Alain Fournet; Christian Bories; Bruno Figadère; Laila Salmen Espindola; Philippe M Loiseau
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 6.529

6.  Inactivation of the miltefosine transporter, LdMT, causes miltefosine resistance that is conferred to the amastigote stage of Leishmania donovani and persists in vivo.

Authors:  Karin Seifert; F Javier Pérez-Victoria; Marianne Stettler; María P Sánchez-Cañete; Santiago Castanys; Francisco Gamarro; Simon L Croft
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 5.283

7.  In vitro susceptibilities of Leishmania donovani promastigote and amastigote stages to antileishmanial reference drugs: practical relevance of stage-specific differences.

Authors:  Marieke Vermeersch; Raquel Inocêncio da Luz; Kim Toté; Jean-Pierre Timmermans; Paul Cos; Louis Maes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Characterisation of Leishmania donovani promastigotes resistant to hexadecylphosphocholine (miltefosine).

Authors:  Karin Seifert; Sangeeta Matu; F Javier Pérez-Victoria; Santiago Castanys; Francisco Gamarro; Simon L Croft
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.283

  8 in total
  34 in total

1.  Intracellular amastigote replication may not be required for successful in vitro selection of miltefosine resistance in Leishmania infantum.

Authors:  S Hendrickx; A Mondelaers; E Eberhardt; L Lachaud; P Delputte; P Cos; L Maes
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Experimental selection of paromomycin and miltefosine resistance in intracellular amastigotes of Leishmania donovani and L. infantum.

Authors:  S Hendrickx; G Boulet; A Mondelaers; J C Dujardin; S Rijal; L Lachaud; P Cos; P Delputte; L Maes
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  In vitro screening test using Leishmania promastigotes stably expressing mCherry protein.

Authors:  Paola Vacchina; Miguel A Morales
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In Vivo Selection of Paromomycin and Miltefosine Resistance in Leishmania donovani and L. infantum in a Syrian Hamster Model.

Authors:  S Hendrickx; A Mondelaers; E Eberhardt; P Delputte; P Cos; L Maes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Isolation, typing, and drug susceptibility of Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum isolates from dogs of the municipality of Embu das Artes, an endemic region for canine leishmaniasis in Brazil.

Authors:  Bianca A Ferreira; Thaynan F C Martins; Elizabeth M Coser; Viviane da L Oliveira; Edite H Yamashiro-Kanashiro; Mussya C Rocha; Marcelo M Pinto; Paulo C Cotrim; Adriano C Coelho
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.383

6.  Preclinical Studies Evaluating Subacute Toxicity and Therapeutic Efficacy of LQB-118 in Experimental Visceral Leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Edézio Ferreira Cunha-Júnior; Thiago Martino Martins; Marilene Marcuzzo Canto-Cavalheiro; Paulo Roberto Marques; Elyzabeth Avvad Portari; Marsen Garcia Pinto Coelho; Chaquip Daher Netto; Paulo Roberto Ribeiro Costa; Katia Costa de Carvalho Sabino; Eduardo Caio Torres-Santos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Treatment failure and miltefosine susceptibility in dermal leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania subgenus Viannia species.

Authors:  Ricardo Obonaga; Olga Lucía Fernández; Liliana Valderrama; Luisa Consuelo Rubiano; Maria Del Mar Castro; Maria Claudia Barrera; Maria Adelaida Gomez; Nancy Gore Saravia
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Fitness and Phenotypic Characterization of Miltefosine-Resistant Leishmania major.

Authors:  Kimbra G Turner; Paola Vacchina; Maricela Robles-Murguia; Mariha Wadsworth; Mary Ann McDowell; Miguel A Morales
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2015-07-31

9.  Leishmania is not prone to develop resistance to tamoxifen.

Authors:  Adriano C Coelho; Cristiana T Trinconi; Luisa Senra; Jenicer K U Yokoyama-Yasunaka; Silvia R B Uliana
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  In vitro and in vivo miltefosine susceptibility of a Leishmania amazonensis isolate from a patient with diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Adriano C Coelho; Cristiana T Trinconi; Carlos H N Costa; Silvia R B Uliana
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2014-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.