Literature DB >> 29422690

Misclassified group-tested current status data.

L C Petito1, N P Jewell1.   

Abstract

Group testing, introduced by Dorfman (1943), has been used to reduce costs when estimating the prevalence of a binary characteristic based on a screening test of [Formula: see text] groups that include [Formula: see text] independent individuals in total. If the unknown prevalence is low and the screening test suffers from misclassification, it is also possible to obtain more precise prevalence estimates than those obtained from testing all [Formula: see text] samples separately (Tu et al., 1994). In some applications, the individual binary response corresponds to whether an underlying time-to-event variable [Formula: see text] is less than an observed screening time [Formula: see text], a data structure known as current status data. Given sufficient variation in the observed [Formula: see text] values, it is possible to estimate the distribution function [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] nonparametrically, at least at some points in its support, using the pool-adjacent-violators algorithm (Ayer et al., 1955). Here, we consider nonparametric estimation of [Formula: see text] based on group-tested current status data for groups of size [Formula: see text] where the group tests positive if and only if any individual's unobserved [Formula: see text] is less than the corresponding observed [Formula: see text]. We investigate the performance of the group-based estimator as compared to the individual test nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator, and show that the former can be more precise in the presence of misclassification for low values of [Formula: see text]. Potential applications include testing for the presence of various diseases in pooled samples where interest focuses on the age-at-incidence distribution rather than overall prevalence. We apply this estimator to the age-at-incidence curve for hepatitis C infection in a sample of U.S. women who gave birth to a child in 2014, where group assignment is done at random and based on maternal age. We discuss connections to other work in the literature, as well as potential extensions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Current status data; Expectation-maximization algorithm; Group testing; Pool-adjacent-violators algorithm

Year:  2016        PMID: 29422690      PMCID: PMC5793678          DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asw043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrika        ISSN: 0006-3444            Impact factor:   2.445


  10 in total

1.  Regression models for disease prevalence with diagnostic tests on pools of serum samples.

Authors:  S Vansteelandt; E Goetghebeur; T Verstraeten
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Regression analysis of group testing samples.

Authors:  M Xie
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Nonparametric and Semiparametric Analysis of Current Status Data Subject to Outcome Misclassification.

Authors:  Victor G Sal Y Rosas; James P Hughes
Journal:  Stat Commun Infect Dis       Date:  2010-04-21

4.  A modified routine analysis of arsenic content in drinking-water in Bangladesh by hydride generation-atomic absorption spectrophotometry.

Authors:  M A Wahed; Dulaly Chowdhury; Barbro Nermell; Shafiqul Islam Khan; Mohammad Ilias; Mahfuzar Rahman; Lars Ake Persson; Marie Vahter
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Regression models for group testing data with pool dilution effects.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Optimality of group testing in the presence of misclassification.

Authors:  Aiyi Liu; Chunling Liu; Zhiwei Zhang; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.445

7.  Studies of AIDS and HIV surveillance. Screening tests: can we get more by doing less?

Authors:  X M Tu; E Litvak; M Pagano
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994 Oct 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Misclassification of current status data.

Authors:  Karen McKeown; Nicholas P Jewell
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 1.429

9.  Group testing regression models with fixed and random effects.

Authors:  Peng Chen; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Nonparametric inference for competing risks current status data with continuous, discrete or grouped observation times.

Authors:  M H Maathuis; M G Hudgens
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.445

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Nonparametric estimation of distributions and diagnostic accuracy based on group-tested results with differential misclassification.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Aiyi Liu; Qizhai Li; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 1.701

2.  Incorporating retesting outcomes for estimation of disease prevalence.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Aiyi Liu; Qizhai Li; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 2.497

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.