Literature DB >> 29422441

Ambient air pollution the risk of stillbirth: A prospective birth cohort study in Wuhan, China.

Shaoping Yang1, Yafei Tan1, Hui Mei1, Fang Wang1, Na Li1, Jinzhu Zhao1, Yiming Zhang1, Zhengmin Qian2, Jen Jen Chang2, Kevin M Syberg2, Anna Peng1, Hong Mei1, Dan Zhang1, Yan Zhang1, Shunqing Xu3, Yuanyuan Li3, Tongzhang Zheng4, Bin Zhang5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that ambient air pollution exposure during pregnancy is associated with stillbirth occurrence. However, the results on the associations between ambient air pollutants and stillbirths are inconsistent and little is known about the gestational timing of sensitive periods for the effects of ambient air pollutants exposure on stillbirth.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine whether exposure to high levels of ambient air pollutants in a Chinese population is associated with an increased risk of stillbirth, and determine the gestational period when the fetus is most susceptible.
METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study in Wuhan, China, involving 95,354 births between June 10, 2011 and June 9, 2013. The exposure assessments were based on the daily mean concentrations of air pollutants obtained from the exposure monitor nearest to the pregnant women's residence. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the associations between stillbirths and exposure to each of the air pollutants at different pregnancy periods with adjustment for confounding factors.
RESULTS: Stillbirth increased with a 10 μg/m3 increase in particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) in each stage of pregnancy, and a significant association between carbon monoxide (CO) exposure and stillbirth was found during the third trimester (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.01) and in the entire pregnancy (aOR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.04-1.34). Furthermore, an increased risk of stillbirth in the third trimester was associated with a 10 μg/m3 increase in PM10 (aOR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.11), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) (aOR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.07-1.21) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) (aOR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.16-1.35). However, no positive association was observed between ozone exposure and stillbirth. In the two-pollutant models, PM2.5 and CO exposures were found to be consistently associated with stillbirth.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that exposure to high levels of PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2 and CO increases the risk of stillbirth and the most susceptible gestational period to ambient air pollution exposure was in the third trimester. Further toxicological and prospective cohort studies with improved exposure assessments are needed to confirm the causal link between air pollutants and stillbirth.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse pregnancy outcomes; Air pollution; PM(2.5); Stillbirth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29422441     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  9 in total

1.  Causal Modeling in Environmental Health.

Authors:  Marie-Abèle Bind
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Acute effects of air pollutants on spontaneous pregnancy loss: a case-crossover study.

Authors:  Claire L Leiser; Heidi A Hanson; Kara Sawyer; Jacob Steenblik; Ragheed Al-Dulaimi; Troy Madsen; Karen Gibbins; James M Hotaling; Yetunde Oluseye Ibrahim; James A VanDerslice; Matthew Fuller
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Ambient air pollution exposure assessments in fertility studies: A systematic review and guide for reproductive epidemiologists.

Authors:  Johanna R Jahnke; Kyle P Messier; Melissa Lowe; Anne Marie Jukic
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 4.  Air pollution exposure during pregnancy and spontaneous abortion and stillbirth.

Authors:  Alexandra Grippo; Jun Zhang; Li Chu; Yanjun Guo; Lihua Qiao; Jun Zhang; Ajay A Myneni; Lina Mu
Journal:  Rev Environ Health       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.022

5.  Risk Assessment for the Population of Kyiv, Ukraine as a Result of Atmospheric Air Pollution.

Authors:  Oleksandr Popov; Andrii Iatsyshyn; Valeriia Kovach; Volodymyr Artemchuk; Iryna Kameneva; Dmytro Taraduda; Vitaliy Sobyna; Dmitry Sokolov; Maksim Dement; Teodoziia Yatsyshyn
Journal:  J Health Pollut       Date:  2020-01-22

6.  Association between maternal outdoor physical exercise and the risk of preterm birth: a case-control study in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Miao Cai; Bin Zhang; Rong Yang; Tongzhang Zheng; Guanghui Dong; Hualiang Lin; Steven E Rigdon; Hong Xian; Leslie Hinyard; Pamela K Xaverius; Echu Liu; Thomas E Burroughs; Daire R Jansson; Morgan H LeBaige; Shaoping Yang; Zhengmin Qian
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 7.  Female Fertility and Environmental Pollution.

Authors:  Rita Canipari; Lucia De Santis; Sandra Cecconi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Does Use of Solid Cooking Fuels Increase Family Medical Expenses in China?

Authors:  Boqiang Lin; Kai Wei
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Integrated single-cell RNA-seq and DNA methylation reveal the effects of air pollution in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  Weiqiang Zhu; Yan Gu; Min Li; Zhaofeng Zhang; Junwei Liu; Yanyan Mao; Qianxi Zhu; Lin Zhao; Yupei Shen; Fujia Chen; Lingjin Xia; Lin He; Jing Du
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 7.259

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.