Literature DB >> 29422252

Achieving high quality standards in laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: A Delphi consensus-based position paper.

Laura Lorenzon1, Alberto Biondi2, Thomas Carus3, Adam Dziki4, Eloy Espin5, Nuno Figueiredo6, Marcos Gomez Ruiz7, Tamas Mersich8, Isacco Montroni9, Pieter J Tanis10, Stefan Rolf Benz11, Paolo Pietro Bianchi12, Matthias Biebl13, Ivo Broeders14, Raffaele De Luca15, Paolo Delrio16, Mathieu D'Hondt17, Alois Fürst18, Jan Grosek19, Jose Flavio Guimaraes Videira20, Friedrich Herbst21, David Jayne22, György Lázár23, Danilo Miskovic24, Andrea Muratore25, Ole Helmer Sjo26, Tom Scheinin27, Ales Tomazic19, Andreas Türler28, Cornelius Van de Velde29, Steven D Wexner30, Christoph Wullstein31, Wojciech Zegarski32, Domenico D'Ugo2.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the rate of laparoscopic colectomies for colon cancer using registries and population-based studies. To provide a position paper on mini-invasive (MIS) colon cancer surgery based on the opinion of experts leader in this field.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PRISMA guidelines for the rate of laparoscopy in colon cancer. Moreover, Delphi methodology was used to reach consensus among 35 international experts in four study rounds. Consensus was defined as an agreement ≥75.0%. Domains of interest included nosology, essential technical/oncological requirements, outcomes and MIS training.
RESULTS: Forty-four studies from 42 articles were reviewed. Although it is still sub-optimal, the rate of MIS for colon cancer increased over the years and it is currently >50% in Korea, Netherlands, UK and Australia. The remaining European countries are un-investigated and presented lower rates with highest variations, ranging 7-35%. Using Delphi methodology, a laparoscopic colectomy was defined as a "colon resection performed using key-hole surgery independently from the type of anastomosis". The panel defined also the oncological requirements recognized essential for the procedure and agreed that when performed by experienced surgeons, it should be marked as best practice in guidelines, given the principles of oncologic surgery be respected (R0 procedure, vessel ligation and mesocolon integrity).
CONCLUSION: The rate of MIS colectomies for cancer in Europe should be further investigated. A panel of leaders in this field defined laparoscopic colectomy as a best practice procedure when performed by an experienced surgeon respecting the standards of surgical oncology.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Best practice; Colon cancer; Delphi methodology; Laparoscopy; Mini-invasive surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29422252     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Evidence in minimally invasive oncological surgery of the colon and rectum].

Authors:  Carolin Kastner; Joachim Reibetanz; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Armin Wiegering
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  The Italian Consensus on minimally invasive simultaneous resections for synchronous liver metastasis and primary colorectal cancer: A Delphi methodology.

Authors:  Aldo Rocca; Federica Cipriani; Paolo Delrio; Fulvio Calise; Luca Aldrighetti; Giulio Belli; Stefano Berti; Ugo Boggi; Vincenzo Bottino; Umberto Cillo; Matteo Cescon; Matteo Cimino; Francesco Corcione; Luciano De Carlis; Maurizio Degiuli; Paolo De Paolis; Agostino Maria De Rose; Domenico D'Ugo; Fabrizio Di Benedetto; Ugo Elmore; Giorgio Ercolani; Giuseppe M Ettorre; Alessandro Ferrero; Marco Filauro; Felice Giuliante; Salvatore Gruttadauria; Alfredo Guglielmi; Francesco Izzo; Elio Jovine; Andrea Laurenzi; Francesco Marchegiani; Pierluigi Marini; Marco Massani; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Michela Mineccia; Francesco Minni; Andrea Muratore; Simone Nicosia; Riccardo Pellicci; Riccardo Rosati; Nadia Russolillo; Antonino Spinelli; Gaya Spolverato; Guido Torzilli; Giovanni Vennarecci; Luca Viganò; Leonardo Vincenti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-06-05

3.  Impact of implementation of the ERAS program in colorectal surgery: a multi-center study based on the "Lazio Network" collective database.

Authors:  Michele Grieco; Laura Lorenzon; Graziano Pernazza; Massimo Carlini; Antonio Brescia; Roberto Santoro; Antonio Crucitti; Raffaele Macarone Palmieri; Emanuele Santoro; Francesco Stipa; Marco Sacchi; Roberto Persiani
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Microanatomy of inferior mesenteric artery sheath in colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Wataru Sakamoto; Leo Yamada; Osamu Suzuki; Tomohiro Kikuchi; Hirokazu Okayama; Hisahito Endo; Shotaro Fujita; Motonobu Saito; Tomoyuki Momma; Zenichiro Saze; Shinji Ohki; Koji Kono
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2019-10-30

5.  Long-term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic vs. open colon cancer resection: a high-quality population-based analysis in a Southern German district.

Authors:  Vinzenz Völkel; Teresa Draeger; Michael Gerken; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Alois Fürst
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.