| Literature DB >> 29420571 |
Gajenathiran Sinnathamby1, Gemma Henderson2, Saleh Umair2, Peter Janssen2, Ross Bland2, Heather Simpson1.
Abstract
Culture-independent methods were used to study the microbiota of adult worms, third-stage larvae and eggs, both in faeces and laid in vitro, of Haemonchus contortus, a nematode parasite of the abomasa of ruminants which is a major cause of production losses and ill-health. Bacteria were identified in eggs, the female reproductive tract and the gut of adult and third-stage larvae (L3). PCR amplification of 16S rRNA sequences, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and clone libraries were used to compare the composition of the microbial communities of the different life-cycle stages of the parasites, as well as parasites and their natural environments. The microbiomes of adult worms and L3 were different from those in the abomasum or faeces respectively. The H. contortus microbiota was mainly comprised of members of the phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Bacteria were localised in the gut, inside eggs and within the uterus of adult female worms using the universal FISH Eub338 probe, which targets most bacteria, and were also seen in these tissues by light and transmission electron microscopy. Streptococcus/Lactococcus sp. were identified within the distal uterus with the probe Strc493. Sequences from the genera Weissella and Leuconostoc were found in all life-cycle stages, except eggs collected from faeces, in which most sequences belonged to Clostridium sp. Bacteria affiliated with Weissella/Leuconostoc were identified in both PCR-DGGE short sequences and clone libraries of nearly full length 16S rRNA bacterial sequences in all life-cycle stages and subsequently visualised in eggs by fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) with group-specific probes. This strongly suggests they are vertically transmitted endosymbionts. As this study was carried out on a parasite strain which has been maintained in the laboratory, other field isolates will need to be examined to establish whether these bacteria are more widely dispersed and have potential as targets to control H. contortus infections.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29420571 PMCID: PMC5805237 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1A representative DGGE gel of PCR amplified products generated from DNA of H. contortus adult worms (HA), L3 (HL) and eggs (HEM: in vitro laid eggs and HEF: eggs collected from faeces) used for sequencing the bands of interest (left). The phylogenetic affiliations of sequences obtained from the individual DGGE bands are shown in the table (right).
Summary of phylogenetic affiliations of ~190bp bacterial sequences obtained from DGGE bands from H. contortus adult worms, L3 and eggs, both extracted from faeces and laid in vitro.
| Bacteria | Adult | L3 | Eggs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | |||
| Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Enterococcaceae | 2 | 1 | |||
| Streptococcaceae | 11 | 14 | 2 | ||||
| 2 | |||||||
| Leuconostocaceae | 1 | ||||||
| 6 | 8 | 5 | |||||
| Lactobacillaceae | 1 | ||||||
| Clostridia | Clostridiales | Clostridiaceae | 1 | 3 | |||
| Lachnospiraceae; | 1 | ||||||
| 1 | |||||||
| Veillonellaceae | 5 | 3 | 2 | ||||
| Gammaproteobacteria | Pseudomonadales | Moraxellaceae | 6 | 4 | |||
| Pseudomonadaceae | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||||
| Xanthomonadales | Xanthomonadaceae | 1 | 2 | ||||
| Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | 1 | |||||
| Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | Comamonadaceae | 1 | ||||
| 1 | |||||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidales | Prevotellaceae | 2 | ||||
| Un-cultured rumen bacterium | 1 | ||||||
| Flavobacteriales | Flavobacteriaceae | Flavobacteriaceae | 4 | ||||
Primer pairs or FISH probes used for PCR-DGGE, DNA fingerprinting and location using FISH of bacteria associated with H contortus.
| Protocol | Primer/FISH probe | PCR amplified fragment size | Sequences (5'-3') | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DGGE | 338f | ~180bp | Lane et al. (1991) | |
| 518r | Muyzer et al. (1993) | |||
| Clone library: Universal primers | 27f | ~1400bp | Modified from Lane et al. (1991) | |
| 1492r | ||||
| Clone library: Firmacutes specific | 27f | ~1000bp | From Lane et al. (1991) | |
| 1040firmR | Meier et al. (1999) | |||
| FISH: most bacteria | EUB338 (Cy3 or FITC) | 16S, 338–355 | Amman et al. (1990) | |
| FISH: negative control | Non-EUBb338 (Cy3 or FITC) | 16S, 338–355 | Wallner et al. (1993) | |
| FISH: Lactic acid bacteria | Lab158 (Cy3 or FITC) | 16S, 176–195 | Harmsen et al. (2002) | |
| FISH: | Wgp (Cy3) | 16S, 150–171 | Collins et al. (1993) | |
| FISH: | S-G-Wei-0121-a-S-20 (Cy3) | 16S, 141–160 | Jang et al. (2002) | |
| FISH: Most | Strc493 (Cy3 or FITC) | 16S, 493–511 | Franks et al. (1998) | |
| FISH: Some Alphaproteobacteria | ALF73a (Cy3) | 23S, 2043–2059 | Manz et al. (1992) | |
| FISH: Betaproteobacteria | Beta1(Cy3) | 16S, 359–378 | Ashelford et al. (2002) | |
| FISH: | SteMal439 (Cy3) | 16S, 439–458 | Piccini et al. (2006) |
*GC clamp added to the 5' end of the primer, 5'CGC CCG CCG CGC GCG GCG GGC GGG GCG GGG GCA CGG GGG G 3'
Summary of initial phylogenetic affiliations of bacterial sequences obtained from H. contortus adult worms, L3, eggs extracted from faeces (HEF) and laid in vitro (HEM).
~1400bp and ~1000bp sequences were amplified using universal and Firmicutes-specific primers respectively (URB- uncultured rumen bacteria). The phylogenetic affiliations were obtained by comparing bacterial sequences from H. contortus with those in the GenBank database using the BLASTn option in the NCBI website.
| Bacteria | Adult worms | L3 | HEF | HEM | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | Sequence size (bp) | |||||||
| ~1400 | ~1000bp | ~1400 | ~1000 | ~1400 | ~1000 | ~1400 | ~1000 | |||||
| Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Streptococcaceae | 8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||||||
| Leuconostocaceae | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | |||||
| 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||||||
| Lactobacillaceae | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bacillales | Staphylococcaceae | 4 | ||||||||||
| Clostridia | Clostridiales | Clostridiaceae | 2 | 3 | ||||||||
| Clostridiaceae | 12 | |||||||||||
| Veillonellaceae | 1 | |||||||||||
| Catabacteriaceae | 2 | |||||||||||
| Lachnospiraceae | 5 | 2 | ||||||||||
| Mollicutes | Entomoplasmatales | Spiroplasmataceae | 1 | |||||||||
| Alphaproteobacteria | Rhizobiales | Phyllobacteriaceae | 15 | 15 | ||||||||
| Rhizobiaceae | 3 | |||||||||||
| Hyphomicrobiaceae | 1 | |||||||||||
| Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | Alcaligenaceae | 1 | |||||||||
| 1 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | ||||||||||||
| Comamonadaceae | 1 | |||||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | ||||||||||||
| Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | 1 | 2 | 6 | |||||||
| Pseudomonadales | Pseudomonadaceae | 2 | 8 | |||||||||
| Xanthomonadales | Xanthomonadaceae | 2 | 2 | 12 | ||||||||
| Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidales | Prevotellaceae | 1 | |||||||||
| URB | 7 | |||||||||||
Fig 2Phylogenetic tree (based upon the Maximum Likelihood method) of phylum Firmicutes 16S rRNA gene sequences from H. contortus using the universal primer set 27f and 1492r and reference 16S rRNA gene sequences.
The 13 groups were identified from closest type strain sequences. Sequences which have been compressed are represented as triangles. Bootstrap values are shown at each node (percent of 500 replicates). The scale bar indicates 0.02 nucleotide substitutions per nucleotide position.
Taxonomic assignment of ~1400bp 16S rRNA sequences from H. contortus, based on the closest cultured and type strain relatives.
Sequence similarities were calculated from aligned gene sequences using the Geneious software package and MEGA 5.0. HA: adult worms; HL: L3; HEM: eggs laid in vitro; HEF: eggs collected from faeces. Type strains are designated T.
| Cluster | Bacterial sequences from | Genus | Closest cultured and type strain (GenBank accession) | Similarity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLP | HA2, HA8, HA20, HA25, HA719 | 99.7 | ||
| HEM519 | 98.6 | |||
| CLR | HA3, HA819 | 99.9 | ||
| CSI | HA1, HA18, HA9, HL11, HEF723 | 99.6–99.7 | ||
| CL | HEF1 | 93.5 | ||
| 94.1 | ||||
| CLL | HA14, HEF8, HEM24 | 99.7–100 | ||
| CLC | HA17, HA219, HEM23, HEM819 | 99.5–99.8 | ||
| 99.4–99.8 | ||||
| HL28 | 96.8; 96.6 | |||
| HEM619 | 92;92 | |||
| CWC | HA5, HA10, HA12, HEM20-22, HEM919, HEM1019, HL8, HL23, HL32 | 99.6–100 | ||
| HL12 | 96.8 | |||
| CSP | HEM29, HEM319, HEM419 | 99.1–99.7 | ||
| HEM219 | 95.6 | |||
| CCT | HA15-16, HEF1123, HEF1822, HEF2022 | 79.9–81.3 | ||
| 80.9–82.2 | ||||
| CCH | HA119, HA19 | 83.5–85.4 | ||
| CVP | HEM25 | 91.2 | ||
| CET | HEF223, HEF323, HEF423, HEF523, HEF823, HEF923, HEF1023, HEF1323, HEF1523, HEF1922, HEF2222 | 93.8–98 | ||
| 94.3–98.2 | ||||
| HEF623 | 83.8; 83.8 | |||
| CEF | HA4, HA6, HA11, HA13, HA21, HEF1423 and HEF1623 | 85.5–91.6 | ||
| 84.9–92 |
*Sequences belonged to these clusters had very low sequences similarity with known cultured and type stains sequences but always fall into stable clusters in phylogenetic analysis based upon the maximum likelihood and neighbour joining methods.
Taxonomic assignment of ~ 1000bp phylum Firmicutes 16S rRNA sequences from H. contortus, based on the closest cultured and type strain relatives, identified by comparative analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences.
Sequence similarities were calculated from aligned gene sequences in Geneious software package and MEGA 5.0 (A: adult worms; L: L3; ME: eggs laid in vitro and FE: eggs collected from faeces). Type strains are designated T.
| Cluster | Bacterial sequences from | Genus | Closest cultured and type strain (GenBank accession) | Similarity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFLC | A2, A4-6, A9, L4-5, FE2, ME2-5, ME7-8 | >99 | ||
| CFWC | A3, A8, L1, L6, FE1, FE3, FE7, FE11, ME1, ME6, ME9-12 | >99 | ||
| CFLF | L3 | 94.5–95.3 | ||
| >99 | ||||
| CFSE | A1, L2, FE4-6, FE8-10, FE12 | 97.3–97.9 | ||
| >99 |
Fig 3Location and morphology of bacteria in the gut (top), the uterus (centre) and eggs (bottom) of an adult female H. contortus.
Left: LM image of a whole unstained worm showing the sites of collection of tissues; middle: LM images of H & E stained tissues; right: TEM images. Bacteria are shown at successively higher magnifications. Those in the eggs were not seen in LM sections. In H & E stained sections, bacteria are shown in boxes and in TEM sections are indicated by arrows.
Fig 4Bacteria inside an egg, near the ovipositor in a female worm.
Bacteria were targeted by EUB338 (FITC-labelled, left) and Wgp (Cy3-labelled, right) probes. The EUB338 probe targets all bacteria and the Wgp probe targets Weissella sp. Not all bacteria were targeted by the Wgp probe. E: egg; ES: egg shell. Bar: 10μm.