Asymmetric and site-selective formal [3 + 2]-annulations of γ-alkyl-β,γ-unsaturated γ-lactams with α,β-unsaturated aldehydes have been developed. These organocatalysed transformations yield high value enantioenriched bicyclic γ-lactams with up to four new stereocenters (sometimes including a quarternary carbon). The overall transformation starts from simple and readily accessible furans and oversees a rapid, controlled, and dramatic enhancement in 3D complexity.
Asymmetric and site-selective formal [3 + 2]-annulations of γ-alkyl-β,γ-unsaturated γ-lactams with α,β-unsaturated aldehydes have been developed. These organocatalysed transformations yield high value enantioenriched bicyclic γ-lactams with up to four new stereocenters (sometimes including a quarternary carbon). The overall transformation starts from simple and readily accessible furans and oversees a rapid, controlled, and dramatic enhancement in 3D complexity.
Organocatalysis is a rapidly
advancing area yielding many asymmetric transformations useful in
synthetic chemistry.[1] It is particularly
powerful when combined with tandem reactions because complex enantioenriched
polycyclic frameworks can be accessed very rapidly from simple precursors.[2] The most important challenge for such annulations[3] is achieving high degrees of stereoselectivity
during the formation of multiple stereogenic centers, especially quaternary
carbons.[4] Successful implementation of
these dual focus strategies—addressing both chirality and complexity—can
provide very easy and effective access to key targets as we exemplify
herein.[5]Chiral γ-lactams[6] represent a
ubiquitous heterocyclic motif which appears in a wide range of important
compounds.[7] From asymmetric approaches
to their synthesis,[8] the stereoselective
transformation of N-protected α,β-unsaturated-γ-lactams
is considered to be the most attractive since it is atom economic
(especially, compared to the corresponding 2-silyloxypyrroles[9]) and offers opportunities for the regiocontrolled
functionalization of each carbon of the γ-lactam backbone.[10] However, there is limited substrate flexibility
for the lactam precursors. For instance, the γ-alkyl-substituted
and the N-unprotected counterparts have never been
utilized. Herein, we introduce a regio-, diastereo-, and enantioselective
functionalization of γ-alkyl-β,γ-unsaturated γ-lactams
utilizing α,β-unsaturated aldehydes as electrophiles and
catalytic diphenylprolinol silyl ether (cat. I, Scheme ),[11] as a highly effective means for accessing these privileged
compounds.
Scheme 1
Selective Formal [3 + 2]-Annulations of β,γ-Unsaturated
γ-Lactams
β,γ-Unsaturated
γ-lactams of type 2 or 3 (Scheme ) were easily prepared
by a protocol beginning with the photooxygenation
(singlet oxygen) of simple furans of type 1.[12] We envisioned that the resultant lactams[13] might serve as versatile reaction partners via
controlled reaction at any one of their multiple nucleophilic positions.
It was hoped that they might be partnered with dielectrophilic α,β-unsaturated
aldehydes activated through iminium ion catalysis.[14] To the best of our knowledge, there is no precedent for
these formal [3 + 2] annulations introduced in Scheme .To initiate the investigation, we
synthesized 2-pyrrolidinone 2a using the singlet oxygen
mediated transformation of furan 1a (Scheme , 1 → 2).[12,13] Purified 2a was
then subjected to various conditions
using LUMO-lowering catalysts I–III (cat. I–III) and cinnamaldehyde
(4a). Strikingly, cat. I promoted the formation
of bicyclic lactam 5aa, bearing three newly formed stereocenters,
via vinylogous Michael addition[15] followed
by hemiaminalization (Scheme ). We found that the optimal conditions were conditions A
(15 mol % of cat. I at 0 °C to rt, 18 h) in DCE
using 1.5 equiv of 4a (90% de, 98% ee, 68% yield for
the major diastereoisomer). At room temperature, the same reaction
(10% of cat. I in DCM, DCE or toluene) was completed
within 12 h albeit with lower de values (see, conditions B and C).
Among the other conditions that were tested, cat. II and III (conditions D) proved ineffective, and other solvents
such as MeOH, CH3CN, or CH3CN/H2O
(conditions E–G) had reactivity or stereoselectivity issues.
Furthermore, the presence of benzoic acid (conditions H) significantly
diminished the diastereoselectivity. This result, as well as the outcome
of the reactions undertaken in MeOH and CH3CN/H2O, played a substantive role in the mechanistic rationale that is
presented. We propose that the stereoselectivity results from an ion-pair
transition state (TS1-endo, TS2-exo is disfavored due to the steric hindrance between
the −CH2R1 and −R2 groups)
that forces the Si face of the γ-lactam to
react from the Si face of the iminium ion in the
first stage of the transformation (2 + 4 → 5i, Scheme ).[16] This transition state
could easily be disrupted by the presence of an acid or a protic solvent.
The aldehyde group in 5ii is subsequently trapped from
the Si face to form hemiaminal 5 (H-bond
directed cyclization). Intermediate 5ii can also be reduced
to the corresponding alcohol of type 7. The formation
of an enantioenriched quaternary center at the γ-position of
the lactams is highly desirable for the synthesis of alkaloids bearing
α-tertiary amines.[17] Furthermore,
compounds of type 5 constitute key building blocks for
the common pyrrolizidine alkaloids.[18]
Scheme 2
Asymmetric [3 + 2]-Annulations of β,γ-Unsaturated γ-Lactams 2 with α,β-Unsaturated Aldehydes 4
All
the reactions were performed
using 0.2 mmol of 2.
Determined by crude 1H NMR spectrum.
Determined by chiral HPLC analysis of
the major diastereoisomer.
Isolated yield for major diastereoisomer.
Asymmetric [3 + 2]-Annulations of β,γ-Unsaturated γ-Lactams 2 with α,β-Unsaturated Aldehydes 4
All
the reactions were performed
using 0.2 mmol of 2.Determined by crude 1H NMR spectrum.Determined by chiral HPLC analysis of
the major diastereoisomer.Isolated yield for major diastereoisomer.To explore the scope of the reaction, different α,β-unsaturated
aldehydes 4 and 2-pyrrolidinones 2 were
tested under conditions A (Scheme ). In most cases, the reactions proceeded with excellent
diastereo- and enantioselectivity and with good isolated yields for
the major diastereoisomer. Among the aldehydes that were used, 4d proved to be less reactive under conditions A, since its
reaction with 2a did not reach completion after 18 h
(conv 60%, 30% yield). However, when the same substrates were subjected
to conditions B (in DCE) consumption of 2a within 12
h affording 5ad was observed (Scheme ). An adjustment in the conditions was also
needed for the alkyl chain-bearing aldehyde 4e (2.5 equiv
of 4e, 20% cat. I, 0 °C to rt) to achieve
complete consumption of the starting 2-pyrrolidinones 2a and 2c within 48 h [see the Supporting Information (SI)]. The resulting compounds, 5ae and 5ce, were delivered with excellent diastereo- and
enantioselectivity albeit in slightly lower yields. For many of the
aforementioned cases, the reaction was terminated at the final stage
of the process by adding NaBH4 leading to enantiopure compounds 7 (Scheme ). The de of 7 remains unchanged when compared with
the precursor compounds 5, meaning that the hemiaminal
stereocenter is not responsible for the observed diastereoselectivity.An interesting observation emerged via the reaction of 2-pyrrolidinone 2d with aldehyde 4a. Even though the [3 + 2]-annulation
proceeded as expected and the crude NMR spectrum revealed the formation
of product 5da with 88% de, this de value was significantly
reduced to 66% during the chromatographic purification of the product.[19] Similar de values were measured after reduction
of 5da with NaBH4 (for product 7da: 88% de when 5da was not isolated and 66% de when starting
from purified 5da). This result is a consequence of the
reversibility of the reaction under chromatography conditions. For
further examination of the reaction, the minor stereoisomer 5da′ was synthesized and characterized. Specifically,
the reaction of 2d with 4a under conditions
E or H favored this diastereomer, while conditions H at 50 °C
significantly shifted the de toward to 5da′ (60%
de, Scheme ). In addition,
isomerization (5da → 5da′)
was observed when purified 5da was subjected to the same
conditions. These observations not only support the contention that
the reaction is reversible but also lend credence to the mechanistic
proposal, meaning that any factor that intervenes at the TS1 (e.g., protic solvent or PhCO2H) leads to diminished
de values.The relative configuration of compounds of type 5,
and consequently, for compounds 7, was determined via
NOE studies for representative compounds of type 5. The
absolute configuration of the major diastereoisomer was determined
via the derivatization of compound 5cb into the corresponding
(R)- and (S)-MTPA esters (Mosher
ester analysis).[20]Our efforts turned
next to examining the influence of the N-substituent
of the starting lactam. N-Benzyl-2-pyrrolidinone 3a was synthesized using the
singlet oxygen based protocol[12,13] and, subsequently,
treated with 1.5 equiv of cinnamaldehyde (4a) and 10%
of cat. I in DCE (conditions I, Scheme ). No reaction was observed after 24 h at
rt. To our delight, however, addition of benzoic acid (10 mol %) dramatically
shifted the reaction toward compound 6aa bearing four
newly formed stereogenic centers and an E-configured
double bond (conditions J, 30% de, 88% ee, the minor diastereoisomer
was 6aa′). In this case, the product was derived
by a Michael addition of lactam 3a from its α-position
to the LUMO-activated aldehyde 4a (3 + 4 →
6i) followed by the trapping of the aldehyde group by the enamide
double bond (6ii → 6, Scheme ). Bicycles of type 6 also constitute building block for naturally occurring alkaloids.[21] Various conditions were tested in order to optimize
this second annulation process. Toluene was found to be a better solvent
for the reaction (on going from conditions K to L, the de increased).
In addition, decreasing the amount of PhCO2H from 10% (conditions
L) to just 5% (conditions M) further increased the de value. Reduction
of the temperature led to improvements in the yield, diastereoselectivity,
and enantioselectivity (conditions N, 62%, 70% de and 97% ee). Other
catalysts or solvents did not effectively promote the reaction (conditions
O and P). Most interestingly, when the reaction was performed as a
one-pot process from furan 1a (without purification of 3a), the final product 6aa was obtained in good
overall isolated yield (60% for the major diastereoisomer) and with
very good stereoselectivities (conditions Q, 82% de and 98% ee).[22] After the optimized conditions were established
(conditions Q), various furan substrates and aldehydes were tested
for the preparation of different enantiopure bicycles of type 6. The results are reported in Scheme . The overall isolated yields are very good
considering that five contiguous reactions are included in this one-pot
process.
Scheme 3
Asymmetric [3 + 2]-Annulations of β,γ-Unsuturated
γ-Lactams 3 with α,β-Unsaturated Aldehydes 4
All of the reactions were performed
using 0.2 mmol of 3 or 1 (in case of cond
Q).
Determined by the crude 1H NMR spectrum.
Determined by chiral HPLC analysis of the major diastereoisomer.
Isolated yield for the major
diastereoisomer.
Asymmetric [3 + 2]-Annulations of β,γ-Unsuturated
γ-Lactams 3 with α,β-Unsaturated Aldehydes 4
All of the reactions were performed
using 0.2 mmol of 3 or 1 (in case of cond
Q).Determined by the crude 1H NMR spectrum.Determined by chiral HPLC analysis of the major diastereoisomer.Isolated yield for the major
diastereoisomer.The relative configuration
as well as the geometrical configuration
of the compounds of type 6 was elucidated via NOE studies
of some representative compounds.[20] The
absolute configuration was determined via the derivatization of compounds 6aa and 6aa′ into the corresponding (R)- and (S)-MTPA esters[20] and was unambiguously confirmed via single-crystal X-ray
analysis of product 6dd.We propose that this reaction
proceeds through an ion–dipole
transition state (TS-endo, Scheme ) that defines the diastereo- and enantioselectivities
(the Si face of the 2-pyrrolidinone reacts with the Si face of the iminium ion). This type of interaction is
weaker compared to the ion-pair transition state proposed for the
synthesis of bicycles 5 (Scheme ), thus explaining the small reduction in
the de values (up to 84% compared with up to 99% for 5). It is notable that the TS-endo here differs from
the TS2-exo described in Scheme because the nucleophile 3 is at the right position for α-attack and, thus, avoids
the unfavorable R1/R2 interaction. Furthermore,
the R1 groups are forced by the benzyl group into an anti
conformation, which explains the E-configured double
bond in the final product. Since the vinylogous Michael addition (2 → 5i, Scheme ) is reversible and the presence of the N-benzyl group is blocking the formation of lactam of type 5 (5ii → 5 is blocked), the
reaction proceeds reversibly to intermediate 6i. Benzoic
acid may be responsible for accelerating a hydrogen-bond directed
cyclization (6ii → 6) in which the
aldehyde is attacked on its Si face, thus establishing
the stereochemisty of the final two stereocenters.In summary,
we have disclosed novel asymmetric formal [3 + 2]-annulations
of γ-alkyl-β,γ-unsaturated γ-lactams (readily
prepared by photooxygenation of simple furans) with α,β-unsaturated
aldehydes catalyzed by an organocatalyst. These site-selective cyclizations
afford high value chiral bicyclic γ-lactams bearing up to four
stereocenters with significant levels of diastereo- and enantioselectivity.