Literature DB >> 29416865

A week of pain in the emergency department.

Hilary Sarah Thornton1, Joseph Reynolds1, Timothy J Coats1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain is a common complaint in patients attending the emergency department (ED), and historically, it is under-assessed and undertreated. Previous research is heterogeneous and does not well describe pain in EDs over time. Our aim was to describe pain in a UK ED using a sample that included every adult attendance over the course of 1 week.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed every adult attendance (N = 1872) over 1 week to the ED of a large English NHS District General Hospital. We noted the initial pain score and, if the initial score was ≥5, the final recorded pain score. We categorised attendances as 'illness' or 'injury'.
RESULTS: In all, 62.1% of patients had a pain score recorded, of whom 50.7% had a pain score of zero. Median pain score was 6/10 in patients with pain; 58% had a second score recorded. More patients with illness than injury had a second score recorded. Most patients had an improvement in their pain; however, around one-third had no change or worse pain at the end of their ED stay.
CONCLUSION: We have defined the incidence, severity and change in pain in an ED over 1 week. This information will underpin the design of future studies aimed at improving patient care in this important area of emergency medicine practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute pain; chronic pain; emergency department; pain; pain measurement

Year:  2017        PMID: 29416865      PMCID: PMC5788115          DOI: 10.1177/2049463717731898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pain        ISSN: 2049-4637


  13 in total

1.  The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain.

Authors:  A M Kelly
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Inadequate analgesia in emergency medicine.

Authors:  Timothy Rupp; Kathleen A Delaney
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain?

Authors:  A M Kelly
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  The high prevalence of pain in emergency medical care.

Authors:  William H Cordell; Kelly K Keene; Beverly K Giles; James B Jones; James H Jones; Edward J Brizendine
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  Quality of pain management in the emergency department: results of a multicentre prospective study.

Authors:  Sophie Guéant; Ariski Taleb; Jocelyne Borel-Kühner; Maxime Cauterman; Maurice Raphael; Guillaume Nathan; Agnes Ricard-Hibon
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  A prospective study of ED pain management practices and the patient's perspective.

Authors:  P Tanabe; M Buschmann
Journal:  J Emerg Nurs       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  The minimum clinically important difference in physician-assigned visual analog pain scores.

Authors:  K H Todd; J P Funk
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  A prospective blinded study on emergency pain assessment and therapy.

Authors:  J Ducharme; C Barber
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  One-week survey of pain intensity on admission to and discharge from the emergency department: a pilot study.

Authors:  C C Johnston; A J Gagnon; L Fullerton; C Common; M Ladores; S Forlini
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.484

10.  Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity.

Authors:  K H Todd; K G Funk; J P Funk; R Bonacci
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.721

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.