| Literature DB >> 29415070 |
Vánio André Mugabe1,2,3, Sadia Ali4, Imelda Chelene4, Vanessa Onofre Monteiro4, Onélia Guiliche4, Argentina Felisbela Muianga4, Flora Mula4, Virgílio António4, Inocêncio Chongo4, John Oludele4, Kerstin Falk5,6, Igor A Paploski1,2, Mitermayer G Reis2,7, Uriel Kitron2,8, Beate M Kümmerer9, Guilherme S Ribeiro1,2, Eduardo Samo Gudo4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In January 2016, health authorities from Zambézia province, Mozambique reported the detection of some patients presenting with fever, arthralgia, and a positive result for chikungunya in an IgM-based Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT). We initiated a study to investigate a potential chikungunya outbreak in the city of Quelimane. METHODS/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29415070 PMCID: PMC5802900 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Diagram of enrollment of study patients and performed tests.
* Out of 17 patients who had a positive IgM-ELISA for CHIKV, 2 (11.8%) also had a positive malaria rapid diagnostic test. ** Of the 12 samples shipped to neutralization, 11 were chosen from the 103 IgG anti-CHIKV positive by ELISA.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants stratified by case definition to CHIKV infection.
| Characteristics | Recent infection | Previous infection | Negative | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) or median (interquartile range) | ||||
| 17 (10.4) | 91 (55.8) | 55 (33.7) | ||
| 29 (16–35) | 33 (24–45) | 22 (19–29) | <0.01 | |
| 9 (52.9) | 31 (34.1) | 24 (43.6) | 0.25 | |
| <0.01 | ||||
| Illiterate | 6 (35.3) | 30 (33.0) | 5 (9.1) | |
| Primary | 5 (29.4) | 27 (29.6) | 8 (14.5) | |
| Secondary or University | 6 (35.3) | 34 (37.4) | 42 (76.4) | |
| 5 (41.8) | 29 (33.0) | 18 (39.1) | 0.70 | |
| Days since fever onset | 4 (2–6) | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–3) | 0.13 |
| Headache | 17 (100) | 85 (93.4) | 52 (94.6) | 0.88 |
| Arthralgia | 15 (88.2) | 80 (87.9) | 49 (89.1) | 1.00 |
| Chills | 14 (82.4) | 67 (73.6) | 51 (92.7) | 0.01 |
| Myalgia | 11 (64.7) | 70 (76.9) | 37 (67.3) | 0.32 |
| Weakness | 13 (76.5) | 58 (63.7) | 35 (63.6) | 0.66 |
| Anorexia | 8 (47.1) | 42 (46.2) | 29 (52.7) | 0.74 |
| Abdominal pain | 6 (35.3) | 30 (33.0) | 20 (36.4) | 0.91 |
| Retro orbital pain | 7 (41.2) | 31 (34.1) | 11 (20.0) | 0.11 |
| Vomiting | 1 (5.9) | 11 (12.1) | 6 (10.9) | 0.94 |
| Diarrhea | 2 (11.8) | 6 (6.7) | 6 (10.9) | 0.51 |
A case of recent CHIKV infection was defined by detection in the ELISA of IgM anti-CHIKV antibodies in a patient with a negative qRT-PCR test, regardless of the ELISA result for the IgG anti-CHIKV.
A case of previous CHIKV infection was defined by detection in the ELISA of IgG anti-CHIKV antibodies, in a patient with negative results in the qRT-PCR and IgM ELISA for CHIKV.
A case negative for CHIKV infection was defined by CHIKV negative results in either qRT-PCR, IgM and IgG ELISA
Data was only analyzed for the 146 patients aged ≥ 18 years: 12 patients with a recent infection, 88 patients with previous CHIKV infection, and 46 patients who tested negative for CHIKV.
Prevalence of IgG anti-CHIKV antibodies according to sociodemographic factors (N = 163).
| Variables | Total | CHIKV IgG positive, n (%) | Crude | Adjusted | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PR | 95% CI | PR | 95% CI | ||||
| Female | 99 | 65 (65.7) | 1.00 | ||||
| Male | 64 | 38 (59.4) | 0.90 | 0.71;1.15 | |||
| 5–19 | 32 | 14 (43.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| 20–39 | 90 | 54 (60.0) | 1.37 | 0.89;2.10 | 1.55 | 1.02;2.34 | |
| ≥40 | 41 | 35 (85.4) | 1.95 | 1.29;2.95 | 1.89 | 1.28;2.83 | |
| No | 94 | 64 (68.1) | 1.00 | ||||
| Yes | 52 | 34 (65.4) | 0.96 | 0.75;1.22 | |||
| Secondary or University | 82 | 39 (47.6) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Primary | 40 | 32 (80.0) | 1.68 | 1.28;2.21 | 1.75 | 1.36;2.25 | |
| Illiterates | 41 | 32 (78.1) | 1.64 | 1.24;2.17 | 1.48 | 1.12;1.94 | |
PR = Prevalence ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval.
Only for patients aged ≥ 18 years (N = 146)
Fig 2Different water containers serving as breeding sites for Aedes aegypti mosquitoes around the patients’ households.
a) Coconut shell; b) unclosed well; c) basin and buckets; d) tire; e) sewer pipe.
Fig 3Spatial distribution of the households of the patients recruited at the Coalane health units.
A: geographical location of Mozambique on the East coast of Africa and Quelimane in the central region of the country; B: map of Quelimane. In red are the households of the patients who had anti-CHIKV IgM, IgG, or both antibodies in the serum; and in blue, the households of the patients whose serum was negative for chikungunya.