| Literature DB >> 29415050 |
Chao Yang1, Shujuan Yang2, Chunhong Feng3, Chuan Zhang4, Weiwei Xu3, Liyun Zhang3, Yixin Yan3, Jiaqi Deng5, Okugbe Ebiotubo Ohore6, Jing Li7.
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common chronic disease that is associated with high serum uric acid (SUA) levels, although the effects of high SUA levels on NAFLD remission remain unclear. In addition, it is unclear whether obesity and high SUA levels have a combined effect on NAFLD remission. This retrospective cohort study evaluated male employees of seven Chinese companies and investigated the association between high SUA levels and NAFLD remission, as well as the potential combined effect of high SUA levels and obesity on NAFLD remission. The study followed 826 men with NAFLD for 4 years, and the NAFLD remission rate was 23.2% (192/826). Comparing to obese and non-obese individuals with normouricemia, individuals with hyperuricemia had significant higher values for total cholesterol, triglycerides, creatinine, and aspartate transaminase (all P < 0.05). Among non-obese individuals, hyperuricemia was associated with a lower NAFLD remission rate, compared to normouricemia (P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was observed between hyperuricemia and normouricemia among obese subjects (P > 0.05). Similar results were observed in the multivariate cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Compared to the normouricemia subjects, individuals with hyperuricemia had a significant lower likelihood of NAFLD remission (RR = 0.535, 95% CI: 0.312-0.916); and obese subjects had a significant lower likelihood of NAFLD remission than the non-obese individuals (RR = 0.635, 95% CI: 0.439-0.918). In addition, the interaction between hyperuricemia and obesity had a statistically significant effect on NAFLD remission (P = 0.048). In conclusion, hyperuricemia and obesity may be involved in NAFLD development and remission, with similar pathogenic mechanisms. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and determine how to improve these individuals' conditions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29415050 PMCID: PMC5802898 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192396
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flow diagram of subjects’s selection.
A total of 4668 employees underwent health screening in 2012, of which 3842 subjects were excluded due to following reasons: absence of ultrasonography or blood biochemical examination; without fatty liver evidence; with heavy drinking(daily alcohol intake of 140g/week or more); with a positive serologic marker for hepatitis B or C; diagnosed with fatty liver based on ultrasonography in female; consequently, 826 subjects were observed for remission of NAFLD after 4 years.
Baseline characteristics of the non-obese & normo, non-obese & hyper, obese & normo, and obese & hyper groups.
| Non-obese individuals | Obese individuals | Overall | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normo ( | Hyper ( | Normo ( | Hyper ( | ||||
| Age (years) | 46.5 ± 10.5 | 43.7 ± 11.2 | 0.021 | 44.8 ± 10.9 | 44.8 ± 10.8 | 0.985 | 0.088 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.3 ± 1.4 | 23.3 ± 1.5 | 0.828 | 27.2 ± 1.8 | 27.7 ± 2.2 | 0.014 | <0.001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 129.1 ± 17.2 | 131.2 ± 16.8 | 0.279 | 131.9 ± 17.2 | 136.0 ± 20.7 | 0.020 | 0.001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 85.8 ± 10.6 | 87.1 ± 10.9 | 0.288 | 88.3 ± 11.1 | 90.8 ± 13.2 | 0.031 | <0.001 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.97 ± 1.00 | 5.28 ± 0.98 | 0.007 | 5.05 ± 0.92 | 5.32 ± 0.94 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.95 (1.39–92.59) | 2.43 (1.65–3.85) | <0.001 | 2.28 (1.47–3.04) | 2.64 (1.88–3.78) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| HDL-c (mmol/L) | 1.27 ± 0.31 | 1.18 ± 0.34 | 0.018 | 1.16 ± 0.27 | 1.14 ± 0.25 | 0.317 | <0.001 |
| LDL-c (mmol/L) | 2.62 ± 0.72 | 2.60 ± 0.76 | 0.837 | 2.69 ± 0.80 | 2.75 ± 0.80 | 0.444 | 0.205 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 5.49 ± 1.72 | 5.37 ± 1.31 | 0.496 | 5.92 ± 2.18 | 5.59 ± 1.26 | 0.045 | 0.010 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 5.33 ± 1.29 | 5.28 ± 1.37 | 0.724 | 5.56 ± 1.33 | 5.64 ± 1.50 | 0.570 | 0.027 |
| Cr (μmol/L) | 76.3 (69.1–83.7) | 81.8 (70.5–89.0) | 0.009 | 75.0 (69.3–84.4) | 80.2 (74.0–91.7) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| ALT (μmol/L) | 28.3 (21.3–41.4) | 35.9 (25.6–53.9) | <0.001 | 34.6 (25.9–50.2) | 38.4 (25.7–54.9) | 0.513 | <0.001 |
| AST (μmol/L) | 26.4 (22.4–33.0) | 30.5 (25.7–40.3) | <0.001 | 28.7 (24.1–36.2) | 31.3 (25.3–38.1) | 0.019 | <0.001 |
| SUA (mg/dL) | 5.89 ± 0.78 | 8.06 ± 0.86 | <0.001 | 6.07 ± 0.82 | 8.26 ± 0.92 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). The subjects were grouped according to serum uric acid (SUA) levels and body mass index (BMI): non-obese & normo, non-obese & hyper, obese & normo, and obese & hyper. The four groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance if variables obey normal distribution or the Kruskal-Wallis H test if variable not obey normal distribution (TG, Cr, ALT, AST). Among non-obese or obese individuals, similarly, the hyper and normo groups were compared using Student’s t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test.
SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, creatinine; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase.
Changes in the characteristics of the non-obese & normo, non-obese & hyper, obese & normo, and obese & hyper groups.
| Non-obese individuals | Obese individuals | Overall | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normo ( | Hyper ( | Normo ( | Hyper ( | ||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.5 ± 1.6 | 0.8 ± 2.2 | 0.156 | -0.1 ± 1.7 | 0.0 ± 1.8 | 0.859 | <0.001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | -0.7 ± 13.9 | 0.6 ± 18.3 | 0.495 | 1.1 ± 16.7 | 1.0 ± 17.8 | 0.957 | 0.631 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 0.7 ± 10.3 | 3.6 ± 12.1 | 0.022 | 1.2 ± 11.2 | 1.2 ± 12.7 | 0.993 | 0.163 |
| TC (mmol/L) | -0.22 ± 0.78 | -0.36 ± 0.80 | 0.115 | -0.34 ± 0.74 | -0.39 ± 1.12 | 0.572 | 0.177 |
| TG (mmol/L) | -0.10 (-0.56, 0.38) | -0.10 (-0.87, 0.49) | 0.732 | -0.12 (-0.63, 0.42) | -0.18 (-0.96, 0.56) | 0.462 | 0.714 |
| HDL-c (mmol/L) | -0.10 ± 0.22 | -0.14 ± 0.24 | 0.161 | -0.11 ± 0.22 | -0.08 ± 0.31 | 0.289 | 0.275 |
| LDL-c (mmol/L) | 0.32 ± 0.66 | 0.29 ± 0.71 | 0.688 | 0.23 ± 0.64 | 0.18 ± 0.70 | 0.444 | 0.149 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | -0.30 ± 1.18 | -0.21 ± 0.94 | 0.451 | -0.29 ± 1.60 | -0.09 ± 1.54 | 0.165 | 0.344 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | -0.04 ± 1.38 | -0.06 ± 1.32 | 0.921 | -0.25 ± 1.20 | -0.33 ± 1.60 | 0.545 | 0.084 |
| Cr (μmol/L) | -1.1 (-6.1, 3.8) | -2.2 (-6.9, 2.5) | 0.346 | -0.9 (-7.2, 3.2) | -3.0 (-9.4, 2.3) | 0.013 | 0.020 |
| SUA (mg/dL) | 0.007 ± 0.015 | 0.001 ± 0.019 | 0.001 | 0.003 ± 0.016 | -0.005 ± 0.020 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). The subjects were grouped according to serum uric acid (SUA) levels and body mass index (BMI): non-obese & normo, non-obese & hyper, obese & normo, and obese & hyper. The four groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance if variables obey normal distribution or the Kruskal-Wallis H test if variables not obey normal distribution (TG, Cr). Among non-obese or obese individuals, similarly, the hyper and normo groups were compared using Student’s t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test.
SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; TG, triglycerides; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, creatinine.
Fig 2NAFLD remission rates of four groups (non-obese&normo, non-obese&hyper, obese&normo and obese&hyper).
non-obese represents subjects with BMI<25; obese represents subjects with BMI≥25; hyper represents subjects with serum uric acid ≥420μmol/L; normo represents subjects with serum uric acid<420μmol/L. Hyper group had a lower NAFLD remission rate than that in normo group in non-obese subjects (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference between hyper group and normo group in obese subjects (P>0.05).
The association of hyperuricemia and obesity with NAFLD remission.
| variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyper | 0.001 | 0.410 (0.244–0.689) | 0.006 | 0.479(0.283–0.811) | 0.023 | 0.535(0.312–0.916) |
| Obese | <0.001 | 0.510(0.359–0.724) | 0.006 | 0.601(0.418–0.865) | 0.016 | 0.635(0.439–0.918) |
| Hyper*Obese | 0.009 | 2.432(1.245–4.750) | 0.028 | 2.130(1.084–4.184) | 0.048 | 1.982(1.005–3.912) |
Data are expressed as relative ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the multivariate Cox proportion regression analyses. Model 1 analysed on hyperuricemia (hyper), obese and the interaction of them (hyper*obese). Model 2 was adjusted for the variables in Model 1 plus age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, total cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Model 3 was adjusted for the variables in Model 2 plus the changes in the study variables.