Literature DB >> 2941401

Comparative antimicrobial activity of enoxacin, ciprofloxacin, amifloxacin, norfloxacin and ofloxacin against 177 bacterial isolates.

C M Bassey, A L Baltch, R P Smith.   

Abstract

The in-vitro antimicrobial activity of five new quinolones, enoxacin (CI-919, AT-2266), ciprofloxacin (Bay o 9867), amifloxacin (WIN 49375) norfloxacin (MK 0366), and ofloxacin (ORF 18489), was compared against 104 strains of Enterobacteriaceae, 51 Pseudomonas species, 7 Acinetobacter calcoaceticus var. anitratus, and 15 enterococci. In general the quinolones tested were active against most bacterial strains. Ciprofloxacin was the most active with MIC90 for all genera tested ranging from 0.03 to 4.0 mg/l. The range of MIC90 for enoxacin and amifloxacin was 0.06 to 16.0 mg/l, for ofloxacin 0.25 to 8.0 mg/l, and for norfloxacin 0.06 to 32.0 mg/l. All strains of P. aeruginosa tested were resistant to amikacin (MIC greater than or equal to 16 mg/l); those resistant by virtue of inactivating enzyme production were less susceptible to ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and norfloxacin than those strains exhibiting decreased uptake of amikacin. Susceptibility to enoxacin and amifloxacin was not affected by the mechanism of aminoglycoside resistance. Of 65 strains tested with four quinolones using log and lag phase bacterial growth, the MICs in log phase growth were one to two dilutions higher for 42% of strains tested with amifloxacin, 33% of those tested with norfloxacin, and 23% for those tested with enoxacin and ciprofloxacin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2941401     DOI: 10.1093/jac/17.5.623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  6 in total

1.  Activity of ofloxacin and pefloxacin against Mycobacterium leprae in mice.

Authors:  S R Pattyn
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Enoxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  J M Henwood; J P Monk
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Randomized, controlled trial of a 10-day course of amifloxacin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of acute, uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Amifloxacin Multi-Center Trial Group.

Authors:  E J Boyko; A Iravani; M H Silverman; D J Schelling; R A Wright
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro activity of amifloxacin against outer membrane mutants of the family Enterobacteriaceae and frequency of spontaneous resistance.

Authors:  M Watanabe; M Inoue; S Mitsuhashi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Comparative in vitro activity of amifloxacin and five other fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents and preliminary criteria for the disk susceptibility test.

Authors:  A L Barry; R N Jones
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  Fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  J S Wolfson; D C Hooper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 26.132

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.