Literature DB >> 29413725

Current practices and safety of medication use during rapid sequence intubation.

Christine M Groth1, Nicole M Acquisto2, Tina Khadem3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Characterize medication practices during and immediately after rapid sequence intubation (RSI) by provider/location and evaluate adverse drug events.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study of adult and pediatric intensive care unit and emergency department patients over a 24-h period surrounding first intubation.
RESULTS: A total of 404 patients from 34 geographically diverse institutions were included (mean age 58 ± 22 years, males 59%, pediatric 8%). During RSI, 21%, 87%, and 77% received pre-induction, induction, and paralysis, respectively. Significant differences in medication use by provider type were seen. Etomidate was administered to 58% with sepsis, but was not associated with adrenal insufficiency. Ketamine was associated with hypotension post-RSI [RR = 1.78 (1.36-2.35)] and use was low with traumatic brain injury/stroke (1.5%). Succinylcholine was given to 67% of patients with baseline bradycardia and was significantly associated with bradycardia post-RSI [RR = 1.81 (1.11-2.94)]. An additional 13% given succinylcholine had contraindications. Sedation practices post-RSI were not consistent with current practice guidelines and most receiving a non-depolarizing paralytic did not receive adequate sedation post-RSI.
CONCLUSIONS: Medication practices during RSI vary amongst provider and medications are often used inappropriately. There is opportunity for optimization of medication use during RSI.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse effects; Emergency department; Intensive Care Unit (ICU); Medications; Rapid sequence intubation (RSI)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29413725     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  7 in total

1.  Etomidate versus ketamine for emergency endotracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Gerald Matchett; Irina Gasanova; Christina A Riccio; Dawood Nasir; Mary C Sunna; Brian J Bravenec; Omaira Azizad; Brian Farrell; Abu Minhajuddin; Jesse W Stewart; Lawrence W Liang; Tiffany Sun Moon; Pamela E Fox; Callie G Ebeling; Miakka N Smith; Devin Trousdale; Babatunde O Ogunnaike
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 41.787

2.  Etomidate Use Is Associated With Less Hypotension Than Ketamine for Emergency Department Sepsis Intubations: A NEAR Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nicholas M Mohr; Stephen G Pape; Dan Runde; Amy H Kaji; Ron M Walls; Calvin A Brown
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 3.  Advancing emergency airway management practice and research.

Authors:  Tadahiro Goto; Yukari Goto; Yusuke Hagiwara; Hiroshi Okamoto; Hiroko Watase; Kohei Hasegawa
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2019-05-21

4.  Propofol, Ketamine, and Etomidate as Induction Agents for Intubation and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chun Wan; Andrew C Hanson; Phillip J Schulte; Yue Dong; Philippe R Bauer
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-05-24

5.  Awareness With Paralysis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Emergency Department and ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ryan D Pappal; Brian W Roberts; Winston Winkler; Lauren H Yaegar; Robert J Stephens; Brian M Fuller
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 9.296

Review 6.  Etomidate Compared to Ketamine for Induction during Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Saurabh C Sharda; Mandip S Bhatia
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-01

Review 7.  Etomidate and its Analogs: A Review of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Beatrijs I Valk; Michel M R F Struys
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 6.447

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.