Literature DB >> 29411338

A Multi-hospital Before-After Observational Study Using a Point-Prevalence Approach with an Infusion Safety Intervention Bundle to Reduce Intravenous Medication Administration Errors.

Kumiko O Schnock1,2, Patricia C Dykes3,4, Jennifer Albert5, Deborah Ariosto6, Caitlin Cameron7, Diane L Carroll5, Moreen Donahue8, Adrienne G Drucker9, Rosemary Duncan10, Linda Fang11, Marla Husch12, Nicole McDonald13, Ray R Maddox14, Julie McGuire15, Sally Rafie16, Emilee Robertson17, Melinda Sawyer10, Elizabeth Wade18, Catherine S Yoon3, Stuart Lipsitz3,4, David W Bates3,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We previously found a high rate of errors in the administration of intravenous medications using smart infusion pumps. OBJECTIVES/
DESIGN: An infusion safety intervention bundle was developed in response to the high rate of identified errors. A before-after observational study with a prospective point-prevalence approach was conducted in nine hospitals to measure the preliminary effects of the intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were overall errors and medication errors, with the secondary outcome defined as potentially harmful error rates.
RESULTS: We assessed a total of 418 patients with 972 medication administrations in the pre-intervention period and 422 patients with 1059 medication administrations in the post-intervention period. The overall error rate fell from 146 to 123 per 100 medication administrations (p < 0.0001), and the medication error rate also decreased from 39 to 29 per 100 medication administrations (p = 0.001). However, there was no significant change in the potentially harmful error rate (from 0.5 to 0.8 per 100 medication administrations, p = 0.37). An intervention component aiming to reduce labeling-not-completed errors was effective in reducing targeted error rates, but other components of the intervention bundle did not show significant improvement in the targeted errors.
CONCLUSION: Development and implementation of the intervention bundle was successful at reducing overall and medication error rates, but some errors remained and the potentially harmful error rate did not change. The error-rate reductions were not always correlated with the specific individual interventions. Further investigation is needed to identify the best strategies to reduce the remaining errors. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02359734.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29411338     DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0637-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  21 in total

1.  Medication errors: experience of the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) MEDMARX reporting system.

Authors:  John P Santell; Rodney W Hicks; Judy McMeekin; Diane D Cousins
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.126

2.  Smart pump alerts: all that glitters is not gold.

Authors:  Silvia Manrique-Rodríguez; Amelia Sánchez-Galindo; Cecilia M Fernández-Llamazares; Jesús López-Herce; Lara Echarri-Martínez; Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana; María Sanjuro-Sáez; Angel Carrillo-Álvarez
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  The frequency of intravenous medication administration errors related to smart infusion pumps: a multihospital observational study.

Authors:  Kumiko O Schnock; Patricia C Dykes; Jennifer Albert; Deborah Ariosto; Rosemary Call; Caitlin Cameron; Diane L Carroll; Adrienne G Drucker; Linda Fang; Christine A Garcia-Palm; Marla M Husch; Ray R Maddox; Nicole McDonald; Julie McGuire; Sally Rafie; Emilee Robertson; Deb Saine; Melinda D Sawyer; Lisa P Smith; Kristy Dixon Stinger; Timothy W Vanderveen; Elizabeth Wade; Catherine S Yoon; Stuart Lipsitz; David W Bates
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  Comparative analytics of infusion pump data across multiple hospital systems.

Authors:  Ann Christine Catlin; William X Malloy; Karen J Arthur; Cindy Gaston; James Young; Sudheera Fernando; Ruchith Fernando
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 5.  Benefits and risks of using smart pumps to reduce medication error rates: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kumiko Ohashi; Olivia Dalleur; Patricia C Dykes; David W Bates
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Accidents and Incidents Related to Intravenous Drug Administration: A Pre-Post Study Following Implementation of Smart Pumps in a Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Aurélie Guérin; Julien Tourel; Emmanuelle Delage; Stéphanie Duval; Marie-Johanne David; Denis Lebel; Jean-François Bussières
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  An overview of intravenous-related medication administration errors as reported to MEDMARX, a national medication error-reporting program.

Authors:  Rodney W Hicks; Shawn C Becker
Journal:  J Infus Nurs       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb

8.  The impact of traditional and smart pump infusion technology on nurse medication administration performance in a simulated inpatient unit.

Authors:  P L Trbovich; S Pinkney; J A Cafazzo; A C Easty
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-04-27

9.  Smart pump technology.

Authors:  Ronald D Snodgrass
Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

10.  Exploring the Current Landscape of Intravenous Infusion Practices and Errors (ECLIPSE): protocol for a mixed-methods observational study.

Authors:  Ann Blandford; Dominic Furniss; Imogen Lyons; Gill Chumbley; Ioanna Iacovides; Li Wei; Anna Cox; Astrid Mayer; Kumiko Schnock; David Westfall Bates; Patricia C Dykes; Helen Bell; Bryony Dean Franklin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  9 in total

1.  The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study.

Authors:  Adam Sutherland; William S Gerrard; Arif Patel; Michelle Randall; Emma Weston
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2022-07

2.  A qualitative analysis of intravenous smart pump usability.

Authors:  Jeannine W C Blake; Sarah M Fiske; Karen K Giuliano
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2022-05-19

3.  Nurse and Pharmacist Knowledge of Intravenous Smart Pump System Setup Requirements.

Authors:  Karen K Giuliano; Jeannine W C Blake
Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol       Date:  2021-01-01

4.  Reducing errors in the administration of medication with infusion pumps in the intensive care department: A lean approach.

Authors:  Alexander F van der Sluijs; Eline R van Slobbe-Bijlsma; Astrid Goossens; Alexander Pj Vlaar; Dave A Dongelmans
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-01-02

5.  Intravenous Infusion Administration: A Comparative Study of Practices and Errors Between the United States and England and Their Implications for Patient Safety.

Authors:  Ann Blandford; Patricia C Dykes; Bryony Dean Franklin; Dominic Furniss; Galal H Galal-Edeen; Kumiko O Schnock; David W Bates
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Intravenous Smart Pumps During Actual Clinical Use: A Descriptive Comparison of Primary and Secondary Infusion Practices.

Authors:  Karen K Giuliano; Daleen Penoyer; Rebecca S Mahuren; Melody Bennett
Journal:  J Infus Nurs       Date:  2021 May-Jun 01

7.  The impact of a novel medication scanner on administration errors in the hospital setting: a before and after feasibility study.

Authors:  Clare L Tolley; Neil W Watson; Andrew Heed; Jochen Einbeck; Suzanne Medows; Linda Wood; Layla Campbell; Sarah P Slight
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  The Impact of Smart Pump Interoperability on Errors in Intravenous Infusion Administrations: A Multihospital Before and After Study.

Authors:  Jilian Skog; Sally Rafie; Kumiko O Schnock; Catherine Yoon; Stuart Lipsitz; Pauline Lew
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.243

9.  Intravenous Smart Pumps at the Point of Care: A Descriptive, Observational Study.

Authors:  Karen K Giuliano; Jeannine W C Blake; Nancy Phoenix Bittner; Vicki Gamez; Robert Butterfield
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 2.243

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.