| Literature DB >> 29410607 |
Hui He1, Mi Yang1,2, Mingjun Duan1,2, Xi Chen1, Yongxiu Lai1, Yang Xia1, Junming Shao1, Bharat B Biswal1, Cheng Luo1, Dezhong Yao1.
Abstract
Schizophrenia is a syndrome that is typically accompanied by delusions and hallucinations that might be associated with insular pathology. Music intervention, as a complementary therapy, is commonly used to improve psychiatric symptoms in the maintenance stage of schizophrenia. In this study, we employed a longitudinal design to assess the effects of listening to Mozart music on the insular functional connectivity (FC) in patients with schizophrenia. Thirty-six schizophrenia patients were randomly divided into two equal groups as follows: the music intervention (MTSZ) group, which received a 1-month music intervention series combined with antipsychotic drugs, and the no-music intervention (UMTSZ) group, which was treated solely with antipsychotic drugs. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans were performed at the following three timepoints: baseline, 1 month after baseline and 6 months after baseline. Nineteen healthy participants were recruited as controls. An FC analysis seeded in the insular subregions and machine learning techniques were used to examine intervention-related changes. After 1 month of listening to Mozart music, the MTSZ showed increased FC in the dorsal anterior insula (dAI) and posterior insular (PI) networks, including the dAI-ACC, PI-pre/postcentral cortices, and PI-ACC connectivity. However, these enhanced FCs had vanished in follow-up visits after 6 months. Additionally, a support vector regression on the FC of the dAI-ACC at baseline yielded a significant prediction of relative symptom remission in response to music intervention. Furthermore, the validation analyses revealed that 1 month of music intervention could facilitate improvement of the insular FC in schizophrenia. Together, these findings revealed that the insular cortex could potentially be an important region in music intervention for patients with schizophrenia, thus improving the patients' psychiatric symptoms through normalizing the salience and sensorimotor networks.Entities:
Keywords: functional connectivity; insular cortex; music intervention; resting-state fMRI; schizophrenia; validation analysis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29410607 PMCID: PMC5787137 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00744
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Figure 1Consort diagram showing the flow of patients through the study from baseline to the 1- and 6-month follow-ups.
Participant fundamental information.
| Gender (Male/Female) | 5/13 | 5/13 | – | – | 7/12 | 0.787 |
| Age (years) | 45.38 ± 9.69 | 45.72 ± 7.63 | – | – | 44.42 ± 4.70 | 0.863 |
| Education level (years) | 11.94 ± 3.24 | 11.22 ± 2.90 | – | – | 11.36 ± 2.81 | 0.641 |
| Head motion | 0.062 ± 0.031 | 0.089 ± 0.065 | 0.078 ± 0.046 | 0.088 ± 0.067 | 0.075 ± 0.055 | 0.560 |
| Duration of illness (years) | 19.66 ± 11.11 | 18.00 ± 8.18 | – | – | 0.611 | |
| Medication dosage in CPZ equivalents (mg) | 339.23 ± 94.15 | 320.53 ± 142.50 | – | – | 0.645 |
MTSZ, Music intervention schizophrenia; UMTSZ, no-music intervention schizophrenia; CPZ, chlorpromazine; Indicated values are shown mean ± standard deviation.
Indicates the p-values for the comparisons (Chi-square test) among the MTSZ(baseline), UMTSZ(baseline), and healthy controls.
Indicates the p-values for the comparisons (Analysis of variance) among the MTSZ(baseline), UMTSZ(baseline), and healthy controls.
Indicates the p-values for the comparisons (Two-sample t-tests) between the MTSZ and the UMTSZ at baseline.
The main effects of time and music intervention factor, as well as the music intervention time interaction on PANSS and neuropsychological scores in patients through repeated measure ANOVA.
| Block design test | 23.83 ± 9.58 | 20.11 ± 10.89 | 25.5 ± 7.11 | 22.78 ± 10.00 | 22.21 ± 11.09 | 20.63 ± 9.04 | 0.186 | 0.669 | 3.487 | 0.071 | 0.32 | 0.12 | 0.284 | 0.272 |
| Spatial maze | 5.50 ± 1.10 | 4.72 ± 1.96 | 5.77 ± 1.06 | 4.83 ± 2.09 | 4.93 ± 3.51 | 3.73 ± 2.59 | 0.31 | 0.581 | 1.69 | 0.202 | 0.24 | 0.57 | 0.152 | 0.783 |
| BVRT | 3.28 ± 2.05 | 3.55 ± 2.48 | 4.33 ± 2.79 | 3.67 ± 2.43 | 2.69 ± 1.47 | 3.87 ± 3.43 | 5.842 | 0.021 | 8.914 | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.631 | 0.717 | 0.33 |
| PANSS-total score | 62.89 ± 17.41 | 64.11 ± 11.73 | 54.78 ± 14.56 | 63.50 ± 12.21 | 63.60 ± 15.23 | 63.40 ± 14.81 | 9.509 | 0.004 | 12.861 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.513 | 0.806 | 0.059 |
| PANSS-positive score | 12.89 ± 4.38 | 10.67 ± 4.60 | 10.66 ± 3.3 | 10.61 ± 4.64 | 12.71 ± 5.64 | 10.71 ± 3.94 | 13.294 | 0.001 | 14.693 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.331 | 0.147 | 0.967 |
| PANSS-negative score | 21.78 ± 9.24 | 23.39 ± 5.98 | 19.39 ± 8.88 | 23.11 ± 6.67 | 23.11 ± 7.63 | 21.91 ± 7.27 | 3.005 | 0.092 | 4.794 | 0.036 | 0.017 | 0.738 | 0.539 | 0.164 |
| PANSS-general score | 28.22 ± 7.03 | 30.05 ± 5.97 | 24.72 ± 5.00 | 29.78 ± 6.05 | 27.78 ± 6.15 | 30.78 ± 6.13 | 8.228 | 0.007 | 11.311 | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.311 | 0.405 | 0.010 |
Indicated values are shown mean ± standard deviation. BVRT, Benton visual retention test; PANSS, positive and negative symptom scale; “t-test2” means the t-test between MTSZ and UMTSZ.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.
Figure 2The FC patterns of each seed in three groups. Patterns of significant positive correlations with the following six seeds: bilateral dorsal anterior insula [(A): left dAI; (B): right dAI], bilateral posterior insula [(C): left PI; (D): right PI], bilateral ventral anterior insula [(E): left vAI; (F): right vAI], in healthy control (“a”: HC) and music intervention patients with schizophrenia (“b”: MTSZ), and music no-intervention patients with schizophrenia (“c”: UMTSZ). For display purposes, all of the maps are shown with t score between 3.5 and 10.
Figure 3Music intervention * time interactions on the FC map of the left dAI. (A) Denotes the altered FC in patients compared with the HCs. The cool color indicates decreased FC. The maps are shown with probability scores between 80 and 100%. (B) Denotes the significant music intervention * time interaction that was observed between the left dAI and the ACC. (C) The bar maps present the FC differences between-group and within-group in the regions showing significant music intervention * time interaction. The data are expressed as the mean value + standard error. ***p < 0.001. PM: probability map. The blue circle marks the same region in (A,B), which represents the positively modulated region through music intervention in patients.
Figure 4Music intervention * time interaction effect on the FC of the left PI. (A) Denotes the altered FC in the patients compared with the HCs. The cool color indicates decreased FC, and the hot color indicates increased FC. The maps are shown with probability score between 80 and 100%. (B) Denotes the significant music intervention * time interactions that were observed in the left PI-ACC FC and the PI-left precentral FC. (C) The bar maps present the FC differences between-group and within-group. The data are expressed as the mean value + standard error. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. PM: probability map. The circles mark in (B), which represent the positively modulated region through music intervention in patients in (C) (blue circle: ACC; black circle: left precentral).
Figure 5Music intervention * time interaction effect on the FC of the right PI. (A) Denotes the altered FC in the patients compared with the HC. The cool color indicates decreased FC, and the hot color indicates increased FC. The maps are shown with probability scores between 80 and 100%. (B) Denotes the significant music intervention * time interaction that was observed in the PI-ACC FC and the PI-bilateral precentral FC. (C) The bar maps present the FC differences between-group and within-group. The data are expressed as the mean value + standard error. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. PM: probability map. The circles mark in (B), which represents the positively modulated region through music intervention in patients in (C) (blue circle: ACC; black circle: left precentral; purple circle: right precentral).
Significant music intervention * time interaction on FC of subregion of insula through repeated measure ANOVA.
| Ins.L | BA 48 | −38 | −6 | 6 | 7.582 | 86 |
| ROL.L | BA 48 | −45 | −5 | 10 | 5.474 | |
| ACC.R | BA 24 | 5 | 24 | 26 | 11.756 | 56 |
| ACC.L | BA 24 | −2 | 21 | 26 | 7.263 | |
| PreCG.L | BA 6 | −57 | 5 | 27 | 13.421 | 118 |
| ACC.R | BA 24 | 2 | 15 | 28 | 9.290 | 65 |
| ACC.L | BA 24 | −1 | 13 | 29 | 8.732 | |
| ACC.R | BA 24 | 2 | 12 | 30 | 11.528 | 165 |
| ACC.L | BA 24 | −2 | 13 | 29 | 11.344 | |
| MCC.R | BA 24 | 1 | 9 | 33 | 10.173 | |
| MCC.L | BA 24 | −3 | 84 | 37 | 9.424 | |
| PreCG.L | BA 6 | −57 | 8 | 31 | 9.126 | 71 |
| PreCG.R | BA 6 | 44 | 1 | 34 | 8.770 | 36 |
BA, Brodmann area; dAI, dorsal anterior insula; PI, posterior insula; Ins, insula; ROL, rolandic operculum; PreCG, precentral gyrus; ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; MCC, middle cingulate cortex.
Figure 6Six-month effects of music intervention versus no-music intervention on insular FC in the patients with schizophrenia. The data are expressed as the mean value ± standard error. (A) FC of left dAI and ACC; (B) FC of left PI and ACC; (C) FC of left PI and left precentral gyrus; (D) right PI and ACC; (E) right PI and left precentral gyrus; (F) right PI and right precentral gyrus.
Figure 7The pattern classification results. (A) Represents the validation result through the machine learning analysis. In the training cohort, the MTSZ at baseline and the MTSZ at 1-month were included. The validation cohort consisted of the UMTSZ at baseline, the UMTSZ at 1-month and the HCs. The blue line indicates a threshold with an 83.3% specificity and a 61.1% sensitivity for differentiating the MTSZ at 1-month from the MTSZ at baseline in the training cohort. Fitting this threshold to the validation cohort provided the accuracy for classifying the UMTSZ at baseline, the UMTSZ at 1-month and the HCs. (B) Represents the prediction result based on the SVR. The scatter map shows a significant correlation between the predicted and true individual percentage of change in the PANSS-positive score.
Validation performance (%) of classifiers based on FCs of MTSZ or UMTSZ.
| SVM_MTSZ | 83.33 (15/18) | 66.67 (12/18) | 77.78 (14/18) | 11.11 (2/18) | 84.21 (16/19) |
| SVM_UMTSZ | 44.44 (8/18) | 33.33 (6/18) | 27.78 (5/18) | 38.89 (7/18) | 5.26 (1/19) |
| PHA_MTSZ | 83.33 (15/18) | 61.11 (11/18) | 66.67 (12/18) | 11.11 (2/18) | 84.21 (16/19) |
| PHA_UMTSZ | 22.22 (4/18) | 44.44 (8/18) | 16.67 (3/18) | 33.33 (6/18) | 10.53 (2/19) |
SVM, Support vector machines; PHA, post-hoc analysis; MTSZ, music intervention schizophrenia; UMTSZ, no-music intervention schizophrenia; HC, healthy control; LOOCV, leave one out cross validation.
Sensitivity (true-positive rate) depicts the proportion at level without therapeutic effect (baseline) who are correctly identified in the inter-group validation (patients).
Specificity (true-negative rate) depicts the proportion at level with therapeutic effect (1-month) who are correctly identified in the inter-group validation (patients).
Sensitivity depicts the proportion of inter-group (HC) for classifying them as the state after intervention. Because there are two states: before(baseline) and after(1-month) intervention for any classifier, HC should be classified into after intervention state rather than before intervention state.