Literature DB >> 29409649

Performance testing of work shoes labeled as slip resistant.

Taylor Jones1, Arian Iraqi2, Kurt Beschorner3.   

Abstract

The variability in friction and slip propensity across slip resistant (SR) shoes is poorly understood. This study aimed to quantify the impact of shoe design features on the available coefficient of friction (ACOF) across shoes labeled as SR. Differences in ACOF and the slipping rate across SR shoes were also quantified. Twelve shoes were tested across five types of flooring and three contaminant conditions using a whole shoe mechanical slip tester. Geometric and hardness parameters were measured to determine the effect of heel outsole design on ACOF. The rate of slipping was evaluated for three of the shoes on vinyl tile with canola oil using human subjects. Differences in ACOF were significant across shoe outsole designs (p < .001). ACOF was correlated with geometrical and hardness parameters. Rate of slipping was lower for the highest ACOF shoe (p < .001). This information can be used to guide SR shoe selection and design.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coefficient of friction; Shoe outsole; Slip and fall accidents

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29409649     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  12 in total

1.  Influence of averaging time-interval on shoe-floor-contaminant available coefficient of friction measurements.

Authors:  Kurt E Beschorner; Arian Iraqi; Mark S Redfern; Brian E Moyer; Rakié Cham
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Worn region size of shoe outsole impacts human slips: Testing a mechanistic model.

Authors:  Vani H Sundaram; Sarah L Hemler; Arnab Chanda; Joel M Haight; Mark S Redfern; Kurt E Beschorner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Changes in under-shoe traction and fluid drainage for progressively worn shoe tread.

Authors:  Sarah L Hemler; Danielle N Charbonneau; Arian Iraqi; Mark S Redfern; Joel M Haight; Brian E Moyer; Kurt E Beschorner
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Predicting slips based on the STM 603 whole-footwear tribometer under different coefficient of friction testing conditions.

Authors:  Kurt E Beschorner; Arian Iraqi; Mark S Redfern; Rakié Cham; Yue Li
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Kinematics and kinetics of the shoe during human slips.

Authors:  Arian Iraqi; Rakié Cham; Mark S Redfern; Natasa S Vidic; Kurt E Beschorner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Traction performance across the life of slip-resistant footwear: Preliminary results from a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Sarah L Hemler; Erika M Pliner; Mark S Redfern; Joel M Haight; Kurt E Beschorner
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2020-07-09

7.  An observational ergonomic tool for assessing the worn condition of slip-resistant shoes.

Authors:  Kurt E Beschorner; Johanna L Siegel; Sarah L Hemler; Vani H Sundaram; Arnab Chanda; Arian Iraqi; Joel M Haight; Mark S Redfern
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Prediction of coefficient of friction based on footwear outsole features.

Authors:  Arian Iraqi; Natasa S Vidic; Mark S Redfern; Kurt E Beschorner
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  Coefficient of friction testing parameters influence the prediction of human slips.

Authors:  Arian Iraqi; Rakié Cham; Mark S Redfern; Kurt E Beschorner
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.661

10.  Generalizability of Footwear Traction Performance across Flooring and Contaminant Conditions.

Authors:  Arnab Chanda; Taylor G Jones; Kurt E Beschorner
Journal:  IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors       Date:  2018-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.